| 24小時(shí)熱門版塊排行榜 |
| 4 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1087 | 回復(fù): 3 | ||
shangqixu銅蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
新手求助,曲折的稿子
|
一篇稿子第一次投了Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.,修回后直接被拒,當(dāng)時(shí)修改是找的他們的副主編(老板認(rèn)識(shí))給幫忙修改的,他還說(shuō)基本上讓修改就沒(méi)問(wèn)題,結(jié)果后來(lái)直接據(jù)了,第二次又投的Soil and Tillage Research,直接被拒,現(xiàn)在投PEDOSPHERE,審稿意見(jiàn)回來(lái)了,要求Reconsidered after major revision ,我已經(jīng)不敢再改了。。。 ,下面是兩位審稿人的意見(jiàn),求各位大俠幫幫忙啊。怎么改比較好啊,第二位審稿人表示數(shù)據(jù)不足,但需要幾年前的實(shí)驗(yàn)數(shù)據(jù),根本沒(méi)有辦法補(bǔ)充實(shí)驗(yàn),補(bǔ)充數(shù)據(jù)啊。大家教教我該怎么說(shuō)呢,這次再被拒,我。我。我。。。。More research is still needed to be conducted in lowland soils (i.e., in rice production). The authors proposed two methods to quantify the SOC stocks. The discrepancy in the results from both methods has been noted, indicating that the overall SOC pool may not be sensitive enough to reflect such changes due to tillage treatments. Alternatively, more sensitive or labile SOC pool(s) is needed. Also, the follow questions should be clarified prior to be considered for publication. Major Questions: 1. The differences in SOC stock (Table III, on page 7) between NT and PT at 0-80 cm were 3.7% and 3.3% for FD and EMS, respectively. However, the statistic analysis indicated that the smaller one was significant. How can you explain that? What was the p-value for the ANNOVA? 2. Using the proposed method, the SOC mass (Table I) of the FD method was around 84 Mg C ha-1 for the background soil. However, the greatest SOC at 0-20 cm in rice production was less than 66 Mg C ha-1. Does it suggest that rice production overall decrease SOC? 3. The English should be improved for better understanding your studies. 4. Please provide specific operators for each equation listed. Minor Questions: 1. Page 1, Line 7. Changes in tillage practice does not guranteen increase in SOC, even for conservational tillage. 2. Page 2, Line3 13-18. Please provide reasonable explanation(s) why paddy soils have more SOC than upland soils. 3. Page 3. Please provide rice cultivar information in the section of experimental design. 4. Page 3, Line 39. What do you mean SOC of the grains? The organic carbon content? 5. Page 5, Line 9. Can you read the equation? 6. Page 12, Line 14. Change ‘effect…’ to ‘Effect…’. I think the results and conclusions reached by the authors from their investigation are probably correct, but in my experience the results from studies such as this during the first few years may differ somewhat from those measured if the study is continued for a longer period of time. That may not be the case in this situation, but it may be something the authors want to consider. Hopefully this study is still ongoing and measurements continue to be collected. My only concern regarding the whole manuscript is that no measurements were made of soil C levels before the experimental treatments were applied. It would greatly strengthen the conclusions of the authors if they could show where the soils were at the beginning and where they are after 4 years of these tillage treatments. There are general results presented for the soil in Table 1, but no results are presented for the 0-80 cm profile. Somewhere in the discussion, it should be mentioned that even though there are apparently significant differences in total soil C after 4 years, there are no initial measurements to compare them to. If nothing else, it would at least be somewhat informational if the authors calculated the amount of soil C from the initial measurements in the 0-20 cm depth and then compared their results after 4 years to that. I don't know that the conclusions would change, but it might provide additional support for those conclusions. |
銅蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
新蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
| 個(gè)人一點(diǎn)小建議:提的每個(gè)修改建議,你都得認(rèn)真修改并做好回復(fù),4年前的,只要結(jié)論可行,能重現(xiàn),現(xiàn)在重補(bǔ)也來(lái)得急,若實(shí)在無(wú)法重補(bǔ)實(shí)驗(yàn),你也得回復(fù)審稿人,表明:即使不補(bǔ)實(shí)驗(yàn),你的結(jié)果并不受到影響等一系列原因。祝您成功 |
銅蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
| 4 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 275求調(diào)劑 +15 | Micky11223 2026-03-25 | 20/1000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 307求調(diào)劑 +9 | 超級(jí)伊昂大王 2026-03-24 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 343求調(diào)劑085601 +3 | 要努力學(xué)習(xí)x 2026-03-29 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 327求調(diào)劑 +6 | 汲亦昊 2026-03-29 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 本科雙非材料,跨考一志愿華電085801電氣,283求調(diào)劑,任何專業(yè)都可以 +6 | 芝士雪baoo 2026-03-28 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南京航空航天大學(xué)材料學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑 +3 | @taotao 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 340求調(diào)劑 +5 | jhx777 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 070300化學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +4 | 起個(gè)名咋這么難 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南師大0703化學(xué) 275求調(diào)劑 +4 | Ripcord上岸 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿鄭大085600,310分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 李瀟可 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +9 | 小蠟新筆 2026-03-26 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 286求調(diào)劑 +4 | lim0922 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 317求調(diào)劑 +7 | 蛋黃咸肉粽 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 中國(guó)科學(xué)院深圳先進(jìn)技術(shù)研究院-光纖傳感課題組招生-中國(guó)科學(xué)院大學(xué)、深圳理工大學(xué)聯(lián)培 +5 | YangTyu1 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿 南京郵電大學(xué) 288分 材料考研 求調(diào)劑 +3 | jl0720 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 打過(guò)很多競(jìng)賽,085406控制工程300分,求調(diào)劑 +3 | askeladz 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿哈工大,085400,320,求調(diào)劑 +4 | gdlf9999 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料調(diào)劑 +3 | iwinso 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿武理085500機(jī)械專業(yè)總分300求調(diào)劑 +3 | an10101 2026-03-24 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 269求調(diào)劑 +4 | 我想讀研11 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|