 |
 |
 |
| 24小時(shí)熱門(mén)版塊排行榜 |
- >論壇更新日志 (2356)
- >考研 (144)
- >蟲(chóng)友互識(shí) (106)
- >導(dǎo)師招生 (90)
- >考博 (84)
- >基金申請(qǐng) (26)
- >碩博家園 (21)
- >論文投稿 (17)
- >教師之家 (16)
- >文獻(xiàn)求助 (15)
- >公派出國(guó) (11)
- >休閑灌水 (10)
- >無(wú)機(jī)/物化 (8)
- >論文道賀祈福 (7)
- >找工作 (6)
- >招聘信息布告欄 (5)
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1088 | 回復(fù): 3 | ||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿(mǎn)足指定條件的回帖，點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話(huà)題的所有回帖 | ||
shangqixu銅蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
新手求助，曲折的稿子
|
|
一篇稿子第一次投了Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.，修回后直接被拒，當(dāng)時(shí)修改是找的他們的副主編（老板認(rèn)識(shí)）給幫忙修改的，他還說(shuō)基本上讓修改就沒(méi)問(wèn)題，結(jié)果后來(lái)直接據(jù)了，第二次又投的Soil and Tillage Research，直接被拒，現(xiàn)在投PEDOSPHERE，審稿意見(jiàn)回來(lái)了，要求Reconsidered after major revision ，我已經(jīng)不敢再改了。。。 ，下面是兩位審稿人的意見(jiàn)，求各位大俠幫幫忙啊。怎么改比較好啊，第二位審稿人表示數(shù)據(jù)不足，但需要幾年前的實(shí)驗(yàn)數(shù)據(jù)，根本沒(méi)有辦法補(bǔ)充實(shí)驗(yàn)，補(bǔ)充數(shù)據(jù)啊。大家教教我該怎么說(shuō)呢，這次再被拒，我。我。我。。。。More research is still needed to be conducted in lowland soils (i.e., in rice production). The authors proposed two methods to quantify the SOC stocks. The discrepancy in the results from both methods has been noted, indicating that the overall SOC pool may not be sensitive enough to reflect such changes due to tillage treatments. Alternatively, more sensitive or labile SOC pool(s) is needed. Also, the follow questions should be clarified prior to be considered for publication. Major Questions: 1. The differences in SOC stock (Table III, on page 7) between NT and PT at 0-80 cm were 3.7% and 3.3% for FD and EMS, respectively. However, the statistic analysis indicated that the smaller one was significant. How can you explain that? What was the p-value for the ANNOVA? 2. Using the proposed method, the SOC mass (Table I) of the FD method was around 84 Mg C ha-1 for the background soil. However, the greatest SOC at 0-20 cm in rice production was less than 66 Mg C ha-1. Does it suggest that rice production overall decrease SOC? 3. The English should be improved for better understanding your studies. 4. Please provide specific operators for each equation listed. Minor Questions: 1. Page 1, Line 7. Changes in tillage practice does not guranteen increase in SOC, even for conservational tillage. 2. Page 2, Line3 13-18. Please provide reasonable explanation(s) why paddy soils have more SOC than upland soils. 3. Page 3. Please provide rice cultivar information in the section of experimental design. 4. Page 3, Line 39. What do you mean SOC of the grains? The organic carbon content? 5. Page 5, Line 9. Can you read the equation? 6. Page 12, Line 14. Change ‘effect…’ to ‘Effect…’. I think the results and conclusions reached by the authors from their investigation are probably correct, but in my experience the results from studies such as this during the first few years may differ somewhat from those measured if the study is continued for a longer period of time. That may not be the case in this situation, but it may be something the authors want to consider. Hopefully this study is still ongoing and measurements continue to be collected. My only concern regarding the whole manuscript is that no measurements were made of soil C levels before the experimental treatments were applied. It would greatly strengthen the conclusions of the authors if they could show where the soils were at the beginning and where they are after 4 years of these tillage treatments. There are general results presented for the soil in Table 1, but no results are presented for the 0-80 cm profile. Somewhere in the discussion, it should be mentioned that even though there are apparently significant differences in total soil C after 4 years, there are no initial measurements to compare them to. If nothing else, it would at least be somewhat informational if the authors calculated the amount of soil C from the initial measurements in the 0-20 cm depth and then compared their results after 4 years to that. I don't know that the conclusions would change, but it might provide additional support for those conclusions. |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
310求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
材料與化工272求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有17人回復(fù)
-
材料工程專(zhuān)碩求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
337求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
材料與化工328分調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
-
318一志愿吉林大學(xué)生物與醫(yī)藥 求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
一志愿南開(kāi)大學(xué)0710生物學(xué)359求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
085600材料與化工調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
327求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)價(jià)值貼推薦，對(duì)您同樣有幫助:
- 稿子讓大修，求助關(guān)于XRD的問(wèn)題
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
- 強(qiáng)烈求助，關(guān)于英文文章查重的問(wèn)題
已經(jīng)有19人回復(fù)
- 停電了，之后Word文檔打不開(kāi)了，說(shuō)是“無(wú)法啟動(dòng)轉(zhuǎn)換器”咋辦，我的一萬(wàn)多稿子啊。求助
已經(jīng)有1人回復(fù)
- 求助英文文章修改方面的問(wèn)題
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
- 元旦投的稿子，現(xiàn)在還沒(méi)送審，100BB求助個(gè)解決辦法和催稿信
已經(jīng)有13人回復(fù)
- 收到稿子將會(huì)刪掉的 信件，求助
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
- 新手求助！elsevier在線(xiàn)投稿時(shí)通訊作者搞錯(cuò)了~~怎么辦�。�
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
- 誠(chéng)心求助 稿件問(wèn)題
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
- 文章被拒，求助被拒信中一段話(huà)的意思
已經(jīng)有12人回復(fù)
- minor revision 新手求助
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- 【求助】中藥分析文章投稿問(wèn)題，求雜志社推薦
已經(jīng)有22人回復(fù)
- 求助關(guān)于BIOTECHNOLOGY LETTERS投稿稿子樣板
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
- 【求助】我的文章發(fā)那個(gè)雜志比較好？
已經(jīng)有12人回復(fù)
- 求助！！投文章前發(fā)現(xiàn)已有類(lèi)似文章的問(wèn)題，急，抓狂中�。。。�
已經(jīng)有24人回復(fù)
shangqixu
銅蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
- 應(yīng)助: 1 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 361.6
- 帖子: 53
- 在線(xiàn): 69.3小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 1390621
- 注冊(cè): 2011-09-05
- 性別: GG
- 專(zhuān)業(yè): 微生物生態(tài)學(xué)
4樓2011-10-24 10:16:23
shangqixu
銅蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
- 應(yīng)助: 1 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 361.6
- 帖子: 53
- 在線(xiàn): 69.3小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 1390621
- 注冊(cè): 2011-09-05
- 性別: GG
- 專(zhuān)業(yè): 微生物生態(tài)學(xué)
2樓2011-10-19 13:47:01
xingling
新蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 379.7
- 帖子: 286
- 在線(xiàn): 45.2小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 1323220
- 注冊(cè): 2011-06-14
- 專(zhuān)業(yè): 理論和計(jì)算化學(xué)
【答案】應(yīng)助回帖
★
shangqixu(金幣+1): 謝謝，聽(tīng)說(shuō)進(jìn)入復(fù)審的接受概率都挺大的，哎，我第一次就是復(fù)審悲劇，所以現(xiàn)在第二次復(fù)審很糾結(jié)啊 2011-10-20 09:12:13
shangqixu(金幣+1): ★★★很有幫助, 謝謝 2012-03-14 10:03:03
shangqixu(金幣+1): 謝謝，聽(tīng)說(shuō)進(jìn)入復(fù)審的接受概率都挺大的，哎，我第一次就是復(fù)審悲劇，所以現(xiàn)在第二次復(fù)審很糾結(jié)啊 2011-10-20 09:12:13
shangqixu(金幣+1): ★★★很有幫助, 謝謝 2012-03-14 10:03:03
| 個(gè)人一點(diǎn)小建議：提的每個(gè)修改建議，你都得認(rèn)真修改并做好回復(fù)，4年前的，只要結(jié)論可行，能重現(xiàn)，現(xiàn)在重補(bǔ)也來(lái)得急，若實(shí)在無(wú)法重補(bǔ)實(shí)驗(yàn)，你也得回復(fù)審稿人，表明：即使不補(bǔ)實(shí)驗(yàn)，你的結(jié)果并不受到影響等一系列原因。祝您成功 |
3樓2011-10-19 20:08:17
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料與化工328分調(diào)劑 +9 | 。，。，。，。i 2026-03-23 | 9/450 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工調(diào)劑 +4 | kikiki7 2026-03-30 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085601材料工程找調(diào)劑 +14 | oatmealR 2026-03-29 | 15/750 |
|
|
|
[考研] 南京大學(xué)化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +9 | 景隨風(fēng) 2026-03-29 | 14/700 |
|
|
|
[考研]
 一志愿武漢理工，總分321，英一數(shù)二，求老師收留。
+11
|
nnnnnnn5 2026-03-25 | 11/550 |
|
|
|
[考研] 291求調(diào)劑 +7 | Y-cap 2026-03-29 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +9 | 張zz111 2026-03-27 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 332求調(diào)劑 +8 | 蕉蕉123 2026-03-28 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 352分-085602-一志愿985 +5 | 海納百川Ly 2026-03-29 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 11408軟件工程求調(diào)劑 +3 | Qiu學(xué)ing 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 322求調(diào)劑 +5 | 舊吢 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 285求調(diào)劑 +4 | AZMK 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿上海理工能源動(dòng)力（085800）310分求調(diào)劑 +3 | zhangmingc 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南師大0703化學(xué) 275求調(diào)劑 +4 | Ripcord上岸 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0856調(diào)劑 +5 | 求求讓我有書(shū)讀?/a> 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華東理工大學(xué)081700，初試分?jǐn)?shù)271 +6 | kotoko_ik 2026-03-23 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 298調(diào)劑 +3 | jiyingjie123 2026-03-27 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工304求B區(qū)調(diào)劑 +3 | 邱gl 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 086003食品工程求調(diào)劑 +6 | 淼淼111 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 上海電力大學(xué)材料防護(hù)與新材料重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室招收調(diào)劑研究生（材料、化學(xué)、電化學(xué)，環(huán)境） +4 | 我愛(ài)學(xué)電池 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|