以前都被拒，第一次收到revise的意見(jiàn)，兩個(gè)審稿人：
Reviewer #1: The paper presents a valuable study on XXXXXX. This is an interesting paper, well written and presented. Taking into account both presentation and contributions this paper deserves to be considered for the publication on Knowledge-based systems.
Reviewer #2: Dear authors,
I found your paper very interesting, however, I have several suggestions to improve it:
(中間列了10多條意見(jiàn)，還算比較好改)，
-- suggestion 1
-- suggestion 2
.
.
.
-- suggestion n
可是，審稿人最后說(shuō)：
In resume, I think it has merits enough to be accepted, but the writing could be improve to make it easier to understand, specially the rol of the experts in the article.
請(qǐng)問(wèn)，最后一條總結(jié)性的怎么response啊，特別是“but the writing could be improve to make it easier to understand”， 這玩意兒咋改��？？
BTW，這個(gè)屬于major revise 還是minor revise啊？
[ Last edited by bear1984 on 2011-10-27 at 07:52 ] |
回復(fù)此樓
+4/228
