| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2534 | 回復(fù): 8 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
wzhhust木蟲 (著名寫手)
|
[交流]
J. Power Sources 審稿意見(jiàn)一個(gè)同意一個(gè)拒絕,麻煩大家看看,有必要申訴嗎 已有3人參與
|
||
|
兩個(gè)審稿人,第一個(gè)審稿人小修,問(wèn)題都很好回答.第二個(gè)審稿人,非常苛刻,把文章放在整體大環(huán)境比較,認(rèn)為工作一文不值.最終拒稿.所有意見(jiàn)如下.麻煩大家?guī)兔⒖家幌?是否接審稿意見(jiàn)修改重投該期刊并寫一封反駁信還是改投它刊? Dear xxx, Reviewers' comments on your paper referenced above have now been received. You will see that they advise against publication of your work. Therefore, I'm afraid I must reject your submission for publication in Journal of Power Sources. For your guidance, please find attached the reviewers' comments. Reviewer #1: The manuscript provides data on the effect of Ti additives on the structural and electrochemical characterization of LiFePO4. The results are interesting, but some points have to be clarified before proceeding to publication: A representative XRD Rietveld analysis pattern should be added. Data on the mean crystallite size (from XRD) and mean particle diameter (from SEM) of the olivine-phase for pure and Ti-containing samples should be provided. Reviewer #2: This paper reports the effect of Ti incorporation into LiFePO4. This paper seems well written, but this reviewer cannot find sufficient novelty in this paper. Since so much work has been done on metal-doped LiFePO4, the merit of titanium incorporation cannot be understood. Unless the authors focus the merit of the titanium incorporation by considering the literature, this paper should not be accepted. Other concerns: 1) Rate capability can be controlled by the electrode thickness and active mass. Therefore, the rate performance is not meaningful. 2) The performance in this paper does not exceed those in literature. [ Last edited by wzhhust on 2012-1-13 at 11:36 ] |
木蟲 (文壇精英)
木蟲 (文壇精英)
|
A representative XRD Rietveld analysis pattern should be added 難道要你計(jì)算Ti orTiO2的含量? the mean crystallite size (from XRD) and mean particle diameter (from SEM) of the olivine-phase for pure and Ti-containing samples should be provided. XRD的和SEM的能一樣嗎?不過(guò)補(bǔ)充數(shù)據(jù)就好了 你摻雜Ti干嘛?為了什么?導(dǎo)電性?最后是Ti 還是是TiO2? 這個(gè)審稿人直接把你拿下了.. 申訴試試吧 |
木蟲 (著名寫手)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 307求調(diào)劑 +6 | 冷笙123 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 266求調(diào)劑 +5 | 陽(yáng)陽(yáng)哇塞 2026-03-14 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工調(diào)劑 324分 +10 | llllkkkhh 2026-03-18 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 346求調(diào)劑[0856] +3 | WayneLim327 2026-03-16 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 330求調(diào)劑 +3 | 小材化本科 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué)工程321分求調(diào)劑 +15 | 大米飯! 2026-03-15 | 18/900 |
|
|
[考研] 297求調(diào)劑 +8 | 戲精丹丹丹 2026-03-17 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿西南交大,求調(diào)劑 +4 | 材化逐夢(mèng)人 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 265求調(diào)劑 +3 | 梁梁校校 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
[基金申請(qǐng)] 被我言中:新模板不強(qiáng)調(diào)格式了,假專家開(kāi)始管格式了 +4 | beefly 2026-03-14 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 326求調(diào)劑 +5 | 上岸的小葡 2026-03-15 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 考研化學(xué)學(xué)碩調(diào)劑,一志愿985 +4 | 張vvvv 2026-03-15 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 332求調(diào)劑 +6 | Zz版 2026-03-13 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程專碩274一志愿211求調(diào)劑 +6 | 薛云鵬 2026-03-15 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] [導(dǎo)師推薦]西南科技大學(xué)國(guó)防/材料導(dǎo)師推薦 +3 | 尖角小荷 2026-03-16 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 中科院材料273求調(diào)劑 +4 | yzydy 2026-03-15 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華中師范071000,325求調(diào)劑 +6 | RuitingC 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +3 | 是Lupa啊 2026-03-12 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 289求調(diào)劑 +3 | 李政瑩 2026-03-12 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 081200-11408-276學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑 +3 | 崔wj 2026-03-12 | 4/200 |
|