| 9 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2517 | 回復(fù): 8 | |||
wzhhust木蟲 (著名寫手)
|
[交流]
J. Power Sources 審稿意見一個(gè)同意一個(gè)拒絕,麻煩大家看看,有必要申訴嗎 已有3人參與
|
|
兩個(gè)審稿人,第一個(gè)審稿人小修,問(wèn)題都很好回答.第二個(gè)審稿人,非?量,把文章放在整體大環(huán)境比較,認(rèn)為工作一文不值.最終拒稿.所有意見如下.麻煩大家?guī)兔⒖家幌?是否接審稿意見修改重投該期刊并寫一封反駁信還是改投它刊? Dear xxx, Reviewers' comments on your paper referenced above have now been received. You will see that they advise against publication of your work. Therefore, I'm afraid I must reject your submission for publication in Journal of Power Sources. For your guidance, please find attached the reviewers' comments. Reviewer #1: The manuscript provides data on the effect of Ti additives on the structural and electrochemical characterization of LiFePO4. The results are interesting, but some points have to be clarified before proceeding to publication: A representative XRD Rietveld analysis pattern should be added. Data on the mean crystallite size (from XRD) and mean particle diameter (from SEM) of the olivine-phase for pure and Ti-containing samples should be provided. Reviewer #2: This paper reports the effect of Ti incorporation into LiFePO4. This paper seems well written, but this reviewer cannot find sufficient novelty in this paper. Since so much work has been done on metal-doped LiFePO4, the merit of titanium incorporation cannot be understood. Unless the authors focus the merit of the titanium incorporation by considering the literature, this paper should not be accepted. Other concerns: 1) Rate capability can be controlled by the electrode thickness and active mass. Therefore, the rate performance is not meaningful. 2) The performance in this paper does not exceed those in literature. [ Last edited by wzhhust on 2012-1-13 at 11:36 ] |
木蟲 (文壇精英)
木蟲 (文壇精英)
|
A representative XRD Rietveld analysis pattern should be added 難道要你計(jì)算Ti orTiO2的含量? the mean crystallite size (from XRD) and mean particle diameter (from SEM) of the olivine-phase for pure and Ti-containing samples should be provided. XRD的和SEM的能一樣嗎?不過(guò)補(bǔ)充數(shù)據(jù)就好了 你摻雜Ti干嘛?為了什么?導(dǎo)電性?最后是Ti 還是是TiO2? 這個(gè)審稿人直接把你拿下了.. 申訴試試吧 |
木蟲 (著名寫手)
木蟲 (文壇精英)
木蟲 (著名寫手)
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
IEEE雜志與會(huì)議專家
|
申訴是下下策,不理你更麻煩?纯催@個(gè)貼吧,希望有點(diǎn)啟發(fā): http://www.gaoyang168.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=1917936 |
木蟲 (文壇精英)
| 9 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[基金申請(qǐng)] 被我言中:新模板不強(qiáng)調(diào)格式了,假專家開始管格式了 +4 | beefly 2026-03-14 | 4/200 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 268求調(diào)劑 +8 | 一定有學(xué)上- 2026-03-14 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 301求調(diào)劑 +4 | A_JiXing 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
[碩博家園] 湖北工業(yè)大學(xué) 生命科學(xué)與健康學(xué)院-課題組招收2026級(jí)食品/生物方向碩士 +3 | 1喜春8 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +4 | 是Lupa啊 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 312求調(diào)劑 +4 | 陌宸希 2026-03-16 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 工科材料085601 279求調(diào)劑 +3 | 困于星晨 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0854可跨調(diào)劑,一作一項(xiàng)核心論文五項(xiàng)專利,省、國(guó)級(jí)證書40+數(shù)一英一287 +3 | 小李0854 2026-03-16 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 271求調(diào)劑 +12 | 生如夏花… 2026-03-11 | 14/700 |
|
|
[考研] 0703一志愿211 285分求調(diào)劑 +5 | ly3471z 2026-03-13 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑,求各位老師收留 +8 | 秋有木北 2026-03-14 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 288求調(diào)劑 +4 | 奇點(diǎn)0314 2026-03-14 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿哈工大材料324分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 閆旭東 2026-03-14 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 330求調(diào)劑 +3 | ?醬給調(diào)劑跪了 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 337一志愿華南理工0805材料求調(diào)劑 +7 | mysdl 2026-03-11 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中科院,化學(xué)方向,295求調(diào)劑 +4 | 一氧二氮 2026-03-11 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程調(diào)劑 +4 | 咪咪空空 2026-03-11 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 314求調(diào)劑 +7 | 無(wú)懈可擊的巨人 2026-03-12 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 070303一志愿西北大學(xué)學(xué)碩310找調(diào)劑 +3 | d如愿上岸 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 283求調(diào)劑,材料、化工皆可 +8 | 蘇打水7777 2026-03-11 | 10/500 |
|