| 查看: 2508 | 回復(fù): 10 | |||
carolwang123金蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[交流]
BRT審稿意見回來了 已有4人參與
|
|
感覺審稿人意見蠻大的,編輯給了小修。BRT上文章,關(guān)于超濾膜物理機(jī)理分析的文章。第一個審稿人意見咋回啊。。。都是大帽子 We have received reviewer's reports on your above manuscript. They indicated that it could be acceptable for publication if you can suitably address the comments (included below). I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript within 30 days. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please highlight in yellow the changes made in revised version 。 Reviewer #1: Paper structure, in terms of problems statement, data presentation with methods, and solving procedures (with adapted models), looks fine and also there seems big faults and significant corrections. But, I also feel it is not easy to find new findings and/or new rational over existing research results (paers). However, to improve the quality of the paper, I strongly recommend authors to add what improvements, over existing methodologies to prove (and overcome) organic fouling, were found, and what purposes of the tested models are, with overall and/or specific research objectives, with connection to presented data and discussions. Reviewer #2: This is an interesting paper where membrane fouling mechanism in ultrafiltration of succinic acid fermentation broth is analysed in detail for different membranes. The selection of ultrafiltration for downstream separation as an alternative to other operation units is very interesting from the point of view of the biotechnological process (succinic production from renewable resources vs the conventional petrochemical process). The paper is well structured and the objectives are clearly stated. Experiments are well defined and the results correctly addressed. However, conclusions are not very novel and the paper does not add any significant contribution to the state of the art knowledge in this field. My suggestion is to (weak) accept the manuscript for publication, but only if the editor considers that the determination of the blocking mechanism that controls the four membranes analysed with different feed and operation conditions is interesting enough for BITE readers. SEM and AFM images (and the corresponding data treatment) are an interesting complement to the paper. A final discussion about the potential use of this fouling mechanism determination as a tool for real time control (in comparison with other on-line fouling rate monitoring tools) would add relevance to the paper. Some minor details should be addressed before definitive acceptance. - The four major factors considered in the resistance-in-series model should be specified in the introduction. Otherwise the reader can be confused with the four mechanistic sub-models of the semi-empirical Hermia's model. On the other hand, these four factors are repeated up to three times in the same page 5. - Page 4, lines 45-50. This sentence "Thus. Hermia's model... the flux decline" is referred to the previous reference (Ho Chia-Chi and Zidney 2000)? Or it is an explanation about the work done in the paper. If this is the case this is already stated in the next paragraph (page 4, lines 53-59). Avoid repetition. - Page 9, line 45. DI? - Page 9, is the membrane operated in cycles with backwashing/relaxation to avoid fouling. If that is the case specify the sequence. - Page 10, line 53. Avoid informal expressions like "what's more" - English should be improved (some grammatical mistakes: e.g. page 4 line 42 "are still existed", page 10, lines 56-59 "For the membrane XXX, it displayed a...", some words misused: page 5, line 3 "detected" instead of measured/analysed/monitored, page 5 line 9 "choosing" instead of "selection", page 13, line 9 "serious" instead of "severe", etc.. Other: - the journal usually does not publish raw data such as SEM or AFM pictures. So, please remove figures 4 and 5 and submit them as supplementary (electronic) material - please number references in the list |
至尊木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
超哥

木蟲 (正式寫手)
|
BRT是啥雜志阿,bioresource technology? 咋感覺這審稿人不咋認(rèn)真呢 |

金蟲 (小有名氣)
金蟲 (小有名氣)
至尊木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
超哥

鐵桿木蟲 (小有名氣)
金蟲 (著名寫手)
| 看了第一個審稿人的意見,估計文章的相當(dāng)部分得重新表述和組織了。 |

金蟲 (小有名氣)
金蟲 (小有名氣)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 288資源與環(huán)境專碩求調(diào)劑,不限專業(yè),有學(xué)上就行 +20 | lllllos 2026-03-30 | 20/1000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 環(huán)境工程297分求調(diào)劑一志愿杭高院 +6 | GENJIOW 2026-03-31 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 307分求調(diào)劑 +6 | (o~o) 2026-03-31 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 340求調(diào)劑 +4 | 希望如此i 2026-03-31 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南昌大學(xué)324求調(diào)劑 +6 | hanamiko 2026-03-29 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工(0856)304求B區(qū)調(diào)劑 +6 | 邱gl 2026-03-30 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研]
|
小羊36 2026-03-30 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 353求調(diào)劑 +3 | 江上楓_26 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 英一數(shù)一總分334求調(diào)劑 +4 | 陳陽坤 2026-03-31 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 270求調(diào)劑 +3 | 小杰pp 2026-03-31 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿北化085600材料專碩275|有文章專利|求調(diào)劑 +15 | Micky11223 2026-03-25 | 16/800 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿廈門大學(xué)材料工程專碩354找調(diào)劑!! +5 | 貝唄鋇鋇 2026-03-30 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 085404求調(diào)劑,總分309,本科經(jīng)歷較為豐富 +6 | 來財aa 2026-03-25 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +4 | QiMing7 2026-03-25 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南京航空航天大學(xué)材料學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑 +3 | @taotao 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 085405 考的11408求各位老師帶走 +3 | Qiu學(xué)ing 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 275求調(diào)劑 +10 | jjjjjjjjjjl 2026-03-27 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿上海理工能源動力(085800)310分求調(diào)劑 +3 | zhangmingc 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑 +3 | 李嘉圖·S·路 2026-03-27 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 296求調(diào)劑 +4 | 汪?! 2026-03-25 | 7/350 |
|