 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2507 | 回復(fù): 10 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
carolwang123金蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[交流]
BRT審稿意見回來了 已有4人參與
|
||
|
感覺審稿人意見蠻大的，編輯給了小修。BRT上文章，關(guān)于超濾膜物理機理分析的文章。第一個審稿人意見咋回啊。。。都是大帽子 We have received reviewer's reports on your above manuscript. They indicated that it could be acceptable for publication if you can suitably address the comments (included below). I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript within 30 days. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please highlight in yellow the changes made in revised version 。 Reviewer #1: Paper structure, in terms of problems statement, data presentation with methods, and solving procedures (with adapted models), looks fine and also there seems big faults and significant corrections. But, I also feel it is not easy to find new findings and/or new rational over existing research results (paers). However, to improve the quality of the paper, I strongly recommend authors to add what improvements, over existing methodologies to prove (and overcome) organic fouling, were found, and what purposes of the tested models are, with overall and/or specific research objectives, with connection to presented data and discussions. Reviewer #2: This is an interesting paper where membrane fouling mechanism in ultrafiltration of succinic acid fermentation broth is analysed in detail for different membranes. The selection of ultrafiltration for downstream separation as an alternative to other operation units is very interesting from the point of view of the biotechnological process (succinic production from renewable resources vs the conventional petrochemical process). The paper is well structured and the objectives are clearly stated. Experiments are well defined and the results correctly addressed. However, conclusions are not very novel and the paper does not add any significant contribution to the state of the art knowledge in this field. My suggestion is to (weak) accept the manuscript for publication, but only if the editor considers that the determination of the blocking mechanism that controls the four membranes analysed with different feed and operation conditions is interesting enough for BITE readers. SEM and AFM images (and the corresponding data treatment) are an interesting complement to the paper. A final discussion about the potential use of this fouling mechanism determination as a tool for real time control (in comparison with other on-line fouling rate monitoring tools) would add relevance to the paper. Some minor details should be addressed before definitive acceptance. - The four major factors considered in the resistance-in-series model should be specified in the introduction. Otherwise the reader can be confused with the four mechanistic sub-models of the semi-empirical Hermia's model. On the other hand, these four factors are repeated up to three times in the same page 5. - Page 4, lines 45-50. This sentence "Thus. Hermia's model... the flux decline" is referred to the previous reference (Ho Chia-Chi and Zidney 2000)? Or it is an explanation about the work done in the paper. If this is the case this is already stated in the next paragraph (page 4, lines 53-59). Avoid repetition. - Page 9, line 45. DI? - Page 9, is the membrane operated in cycles with backwashing/relaxation to avoid fouling. If that is the case specify the sequence. - Page 10, line 53. Avoid informal expressions like "what's more" - English should be improved (some grammatical mistakes: e.g. page 4 line 42 "are still existed", page 10, lines 56-59 "For the membrane XXX, it displayed a...", some words misused: page 5, line 3 "detected" instead of measured/analysed/monitored, page 5 line 9 "choosing" instead of "selection", page 13, line 9 "serious" instead of "severe", etc.. Other: - the journal usually does not publish raw data such as SEM or AFM pictures. So, please remove figures 4 and 5 and submit them as supplementary (electronic) material - please number references in the list |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
08工科275分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
288求調(diào)劑 一志愿哈工大 材料與化工
已經(jīng)有14人回復(fù)
-
安徽大學(xué)專碩生物與醫(yī)藥專業(yè)(086000)324分，英語已過四六級，六級521，求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
-
070300化學(xué)求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有12人回復(fù)
-
化學(xué)308分調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有12人回復(fù)
-
359求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
一志愿武理材料工程302調(diào)劑環(huán)化或化工
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
-
材料工程085601數(shù)二英一335求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
一志愿北京科技大學(xué)材料學(xué)碩328分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
0856求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)價值貼推薦，對您同樣有幫助:
- 審稿意見回來了，大修，修改意見里有句話不太懂，求助�。�
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- APL審稿意見回來了，我卻崩潰了！
已經(jīng)有36人回復(fù)
- 審稿意見剛回來，審稿人的編號是指什么，求助
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
- SCI審稿意見回來了，編輯給的moderate revision，麻煩大家?guī)头治鲆幌�，有BB
已經(jīng)有28人回復(fù)
- 11月1日下午剛送外審，11月2日傍晚顯示已有一個審稿意見回來了，說明什么，被拒絕了？
已經(jīng)有25人回復(fù)
- World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology審稿意見回來了
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
- 一篇文章major revision后，審稿意見已經(jīng)回來1周了，還是沒有消息
已經(jīng)有23人回復(fù)
- SCI文章審稿人意見回來，卻不知如何答復(fù)，請各位前輩指點
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
- 審稿意見回來，一個審稿人讓據(jù)，編輯說大修，大家?guī)臀铱纯聪Ｍ蟛?/a>
已經(jīng)有24人回復(fù)
carolwang123
金蟲 (小有名氣)
- 應(yīng)助: 5 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 2081
- 散金: 248
- 紅花: 4
- 帖子: 208
- 在線: 196.8小時
- 蟲號: 1409785
- 注冊: 2011-09-20
- 專業(yè): 生物化工與食品化工
9樓2012-03-16 08:57:13
seapass
至尊木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
超哥
- SEPI: 18
- 應(yīng)助: 772 (博后)
- 貴賓: 3.074
- 金幣: 16568.4
- 散金: 5496
- 紅花: 82
- 沙發(fā): 10
- 帖子: 3728
- 在線: 930.8小時
- 蟲號: 441856
- 注冊: 2007-10-27
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 海洋環(huán)境科學(xué)
carolwang123
2樓2012-03-13 21:43:09
gentleman891
木蟲 (正式寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 39 (小學(xué)生)
- 金幣: 3451.3
- 散金: 536
- 紅花: 2
- 帖子: 505
- 在線: 247小時
- 蟲號: 538117
- 注冊: 2008-04-02
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 生物化工與食品化工
★
小木蟲(金幣+0.5): 給個紅包，謝謝回帖
小木蟲(金幣+0.5): 給個紅包，謝謝回帖
|
BRT是啥雜志阿，bioresource technology? 咋感覺這審稿人不咋認真呢 |
» 本帖已獲得的紅花（最新10朵）
3樓2012-03-14 06:50:10
carolwang123
金蟲 (小有名氣)
- 應(yīng)助: 5 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 2081
- 散金: 248
- 紅花: 4
- 帖子: 208
- 在線: 196.8小時
- 蟲號: 1409785
- 注冊: 2011-09-20
- 專業(yè): 生物化工與食品化工
4樓2012-03-14 08:54:10
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料調(diào)劑 +9 | Eujd1 2026-03-31 | 10/500 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 299求調(diào)劑 +8 | 嗯嗯嗯嗯2 2026-03-27 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 284求調(diào)劑 +9 | 小熊～～ 2026-03-31 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[電化學(xué)] 070300化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +5 | 山頂見α 2026-03-25 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 江蘇蘇北高校誠邀調(diào)劑同學(xué) +3 | zzll406 2026-03-31 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 08工科，295，接受跨專業(yè)調(diào)劑 +4 | lmnlzy 2026-03-31 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 英一數(shù)一總分334求調(diào)劑 +4 | 陳陽坤 2026-03-31 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 270求調(diào)劑 +3 | 小杰pp 2026-03-31 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿大連理工大學(xué)，機械工程學(xué)碩，341 +3 | 西瓜田的守望者 2026-03-30 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 南京大學(xué)化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +11 | 景隨風(fēng) 2026-03-29 | 16/800 |
|
|
|
[考研] 291求調(diào)劑 +12 | Y-cap 2026-03-29 | 15/750 |
|
|
|
材料與化工調(diào)劑一志愿大連海事085600，349 +6 | 吃的不少 2026-03-30 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +6 | 丹青奶蓋 2026-03-26 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085602 化學(xué)工程專碩 340分求調(diào)劑 +4 | qianbai11 2026-03-29 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 348求調(diào)劑 +6 | 小懶蟲不懶了 2026-03-28 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +10 | 張zz111 2026-03-27 | 11/550 |
|
|
|
[考研] 295求調(diào)劑 +5 | wei-5 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 340求調(diào)劑 +5 | jhx777 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 266求調(diào)劑 +11 | 陽陽哇塞 2026-03-27 | 12/600 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料求調(diào)劑 +5 | .m.. 2026-03-25 | 5/250 |
|