| 查看: 3928 | 回復(fù): 26 | ||||
laodai00鐵蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[交流]
Applied Optics 大修后被拒,該如何是好,請各位蟲友指教 已有9人參與
|
|
初審兩個審稿人,一個同意發(fā)表,一個不同意,編輯給的大修,修改完編輯又返回給那個不同意發(fā)表的審稿人,一個月后被拒,意見如下: Dear Sir ***: Your revised manuscript does not suitably address the reviewers’ concerns, therefore I cannot accept your manuscript in its present form for publication in Applied Optics. If you wish to revise your manuscript to meet the reviewers’ objections (given below), you may choose to resubmit it to APPLIED OPTICS. The manuscript will, however, be regarded as a new manuscript and be given a new submission date. Thank you for submitting your manuscript to APPLIED OPTICS. We hope that we will be able to serve you in the future. Sincerely, **** ****, Topical Editor, APPLIED OPTICS ---------------------------- Reviewer comments provided here: Reviewer 1 After reading thru the authors responding letter, I was not convinced by the authors’ arguments. The major problem was focused on the linear Interpolation estimation of the unknowns that the authors proposed for wavefront estimation of large amount of shearing. It is true that for 2-D wavefront estimation, if wavefront resolution is based on the shear amount, the spatial resolution can be low for the large shears. And if you want to obtain a high spatial resolution estimation, you have to take more measurements. This is the price we should pay at present for high resolution estimation. Compare to the small shear (such as one pixel shear), wavefront estimation based on large shear (more than one pixel) with proposed method does have an advantage of high resolution in wavefront estimation as the small shear, except for linear interpolation approach for the wavefront unknowns, which is not acceptable. If the interpolation could be used for estimating the unknown values, why the authors do not use the linear interpolation of wavefront slope? At least it is more accurate and more reasonable than the linear interpolation of the unknown wavefront. It is also true that for the large shear the signal to noise ratio could be higher, but we are not clear how the authors would treat the 2pi(or one pi) phase ambiguity for the large shear scenario, which can be a big problem. For the finite difference based wavefront estimation, it is approximate method even if the authors think it is “ exactly accurate in principle”. It is generally not acceptable in the field of wavefront metrology if a method is principally incorrect even if the induced error is only 1-5% for some specific simulation examples. Of course, you can still use it as your own purpose, but it is not proper to publish to mislead the academia. 各位怎么看?重投還是改投? |
找工作 |
金蟲 (正式寫手)

鐵蟲 (小有名氣)
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)

鐵蟲 (小有名氣)
至尊木蟲 (知名作家)
鐵蟲 (小有名氣)
鐵蟲 (小有名氣)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 316求調(diào)劑 +7 | 江辭666 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料與化工272求調(diào)劑 +9 | 阿斯蒂芬2004 2026-03-28 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 339求調(diào)劑,想調(diào)回江蘇 +6 | 烤麥芽 2026-03-27 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 352分 化工與材料 +5 | 海納百川Ly 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 086000調(diào)劑 +3 | 7901117076 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 265求調(diào)劑11408 +3 | 劉小鹿lu 2026-03-27 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 266分求材料化工冶金礦業(yè)等專業(yè)的調(diào)劑 +4 | 哇呼哼呼哼 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑323材料與化工 +7 | 1124361 2026-03-24 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 276求調(diào)劑。有半年電池和半年高分子實(shí)習(xí)經(jīng)歷 +10 | 材料學(xué)257求調(diào)劑 2026-03-23 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿陜師大生物學(xué)071000,298分,求調(diào)劑 +5 | SYA! 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研]
|
鐘llll 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 085601求調(diào)劑總分293英一數(shù)二 +4 | 鋼鐵大炮 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 281求調(diào)劑 +6 | Koxui 2026-03-24 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中南大學(xué)化學(xué)學(xué)碩0703總分337求調(diào)劑 +7 | niko- 2026-03-22 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 生物技術(shù)與工程 +3 | 1294608413 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 各位老師您好:本人初試372分 +5 | jj涌77 2026-03-25 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 0854電子信息求調(diào)劑 324 +4 | Promise-jyl 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料調(diào)劑 +3 | iwinso 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 300分,材料,求調(diào)劑,英一數(shù)二 +5 | 超贊的 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 275求調(diào)劑 +6 | shansx 2026-03-22 | 8/400 |
|