| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2753 | 回復: 9 | ||
| 當前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||
gc452金蟲 (著名寫手)
|
[求助]
編輯回復,幫忙翻譯下
|
|
|
投了一篇英文,編輯給回復:Dear Dr Ma, I can now inform you that the reviewers and editor have evaluated the manuscript "Characterization of the particle size fractions associated heavy metals in tropical arable soils from Hainan Island, China" (Dr Lingling Ma). I am pleased to say that it has been favourably received and publication with minor revision is recommended (see below and on http://ees.elsevier.com/gexplo/). Please consider the reviews to see if revision would be feasible. To facilitate further review, add line numbers in the text of your manuscript. Should you wish to resubmit you should explain how and where (i.e. by giving line numbers) each point of the reviewers' comments has been incorporated. For this, use submission item "Revision Notes" when uploading your revision. Also, indicate the changes in an annotated version of the revised manuscript (submission item "Revision, changes marked" . Please follow the order "Revision Notes", "Revision, changes marked", "Manuscript", etc.Should you disagree with any part of the reviews, please explain why. Please strictly follow the formatting requirements as presented in the Guide for Authors. Given that the requested revisions are fairly minor the new version is required within the month. To submit a revision, go to http://ees.elsevier.com/gexplo/ and log in as an author. You will find your submission record under Submission(s) Needing Revision. When resubmitting, please present any figures, tables etc. as separate files. See the Artwork Guidelines on the home page right menu for further file naming conventions, referencing and format issues. When resubmitting, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word) of all text and tables. Uploading a pdf file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication. If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them. I hope that you will find the comments to be of use to you and am looking forward with interest to receiving your revision. Thank you for submitting your work to this journal. Kind regards, Kreeti Saravanan Journal Manager Journal of Geochemical Exploration .......................................................... Important note: If a reviewer has provided a review or other materials as attachments, those items will not be in this letter. Please ensure therefore that you log on to the journal site and check if any attachments have been provided. COMMENTS FROM EDITORS AND REVIEWERS You may obtain the specific comments from two reviewers for your manuscript and should revise the manuscript as well as a point-by-point reply to the comments. After you have taken care of all the suggestions, you can resubmit the modified paper to be evaluated for acceptance for publication on JGE. Following, some associate editor suggestions to authors: (1) Lines 227: Pichler et al., 1996 is not in the references Reviewer #1: This paper contains data of potential interest to an international scientific community. The English language and the general composition of the manuscript is quite satisfactory. The following comments apply to the manuscript: - The use of decimals is generally excessive. Only one digit more than the last significant one should be listed. This applies to the Abstract (% micro-aggregates), Results and Discussion, and Table 1. As an example: If the accuracy of the Cr determination is 5% (it is hardly any better as judged from the analysis of SRMs)the numbers for this element in Table 1 should be given with only 3 significant digits (e.g. 204 instead of 204.27 and 21.2 instead of 21.21). - In the abstract it is stated that the mobility of the metals was "analyzed". What was studied is rather the "leachability". - In fig. line explaining the symbols used should be moved to the figure text. The figure looks to "busy" as it is now. Reviewer #2: Soil pollution by heavy metal is getting worse with the rapid development economy in China. This ms. presented the characteristics of heavy metals in tropical arable soils in Hainan Island, China. I considered that this ms. can be accepted for publication after a minor revision. The detailed comments are as follows: 1. What is the detection limit of TOC measurement? 2. Page 8 line 159, the section of "2.4 Statistical analysis" is unnecessary in the article. 3. The authors should add some appropriate discussion related to the source of heavy metals. 4. There are many syntax error and punctuation abuse. I suggest the authors finding native English persons to help with the ms.. 哪個蟲友幫忙翻譯下,謝謝 |

至尊木蟲 (知名作家)

木蟲 (正式寫手)
至尊木蟲 (知名作家)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0817化工學碩調(diào)劑 +3 | 努力上岸中! 2026-03-31 | 3/150 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 085601一志愿中山大學深圳材料工程330求調(diào)劑 +5 | pipiver 2026-03-30 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +3 | 圖鑒212 2026-03-30 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程專碩求調(diào)劑 +8 | hyl3153942 2026-03-29 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑 +4 | GK72 2026-03-30 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學321分求調(diào)劑 +10 | 三dd. 2026-03-30 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 295材料工程專碩求調(diào)劑 +10 | 1428151015 2026-03-27 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 322求調(diào)劑 +10 | 宋明欣 2026-03-27 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 329求調(diào)劑,一志愿西北工業(yè)大學,材料工程(085601) +5 | 小小機靈蟲 2026-03-29 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 本科211生物醫(yī)學工程085409求調(diào)劑339分 +3 | 里子木yy 2026-03-29 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 化學308分調(diào)劑 +7 | 你好明天你好 2026-03-30 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 求化學調(diào)劑 +11 | wulanna 2026-03-28 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 296求調(diào)劑 +10 | 彼岸t 2026-03-29 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +4 | QiMing7 2026-03-25 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +7 | 小蠟新筆 2026-03-29 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 289求調(diào)劑 +5 | BrightLL 2026-03-29 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 070305高分子化學與物理 304分求調(diào)劑 +12 | c297914 2026-03-28 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 339求調(diào)劑,想調(diào)回江蘇 +6 | 烤麥芽 2026-03-27 | 8/400 |
|
|
[碩博家園] 北京林業(yè)大學碩導招生廣告 +6 | kongweilin 2026-03-26 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 081200-11408-276學碩求調(diào)劑 +3 | 崔wj 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|