| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 8075 | 回復(fù): 23 | ||||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||||
zhangjishi金蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
剛收到SCI期刊的審稿意見,如何回答審稿人?
|
|||
|
第一篇SCi投稿,今天剛剛收到審稿意見。共有3個(gè)審稿人。前2個(gè)的問題基本都是些小問題,但是第三個(gè)審稿的意見本人覺得不好解決,有拒稿的意思。請(qǐng)各位大俠指點(diǎn)。以下是第三個(gè)審稿人的意見: Reviewer: 3 >Comments to the Author >The ideas in the paper are interesting and the theoretic results obtained have some potential in applications. However, the paper is poorly written and the organization needs a big improvement, although the results are globally technically correct. Therefore, this reviewer does not recomend its acceptance as a full paper at this stage. > >1. The motivation of wide practical use of the theoretic results presented should be clearly emphasized. At this stage, it is not quite clear to the reviewer. > >2. As similar problem in the paper has been studied by others in the past, so the unique features of the approaches proposed and the main advantages of the results over others have to be clearly commented and shown. > >3. The example used to demonstrate the main results need to be improved. More remarks should be given to the figures to clearly demonstrate the effectiveness of the obtained results. > >4. The paper also has some typos and language issue which needs to be checked and corrected in the revision. > >5. It seems that all the techniques used to solve the problems have been proposed in literature. What are the difficultis when dealing with these problems. The authors fail to illustrate this point clearly. Considering this, this reviewer thinks that the paper better be shortened and reorganized as a brief paper. |
SCI寫作經(jīng)驗(yàn)交流 | 英文論文投稿 |

木蟲 (著名寫手)
|
首先恭喜樓主,有修改的機(jī)會(huì)。 感覺命運(yùn)和我差不多,我也是之前收到的大修建議,3個(gè)審稿人, 尤其是第三個(gè)給的評(píng)價(jià)不高, 而且我也一條和樓主第二條一樣的意見,而且審稿人還給出了篇文章叫我去看。(我看了也不覺得是他說的那樣類似),而且同一個(gè)領(lǐng)域的東西,尤其是工程方面,都是很類似的(個(gè)人就覺得是不是審稿人想讓我引用他的文章,頭疼中。。。)。 我也想借樓主的貼問下大家。 審稿人的意見是不是要盡量采納啊, 還是能反駁盡量反駁。(個(gè)人覺得都按照審稿人的意見去走,會(huì)不會(huì)人家(尤其是編輯)覺得學(xué)術(shù)做的沒有主心骨?) |
鐵桿木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
|
Q: 第一篇SCi投稿,今天剛剛收到審稿意見。共有3個(gè)審稿人。前2個(gè)的問題基本都是些小問題,但是第三個(gè)審稿的意見本人覺得不好解決,有拒稿的意思。請(qǐng)各位大俠指點(diǎn)。以下是第三個(gè)審稿人的意見: A: 共 5條意見~ 根據(jù)逐條意見~去修改你的本文~ 1,3,4 點(diǎn)是基本問題~ 2,5 是樓主進(jìn)一步思考的問題~ 編輯對(duì)你算是比較好的~ 給你有修改的機(jī)會(huì)~ 不然~換做其他的 editor, 早 reject 了~ 祝福樓主~ 樓主加油~ |

至尊木蟲 (知名作家)
無助又無奈

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑 +4 | 鵬鵬碰嘭嘭 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 考研生物與醫(yī)藥調(diào)劑 +4 | 鐵憨憨123425 2026-03-31 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 本科211安全工程,初試290分,求調(diào)劑 +3 | 2719846834 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 288求調(diào)劑 一志愿哈工大 材料與化工 +9 | 洛神哥哥 2026-03-31 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑一志愿合肥工業(yè)大學(xué) +9 | 秋二十二 2026-03-30 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 272求調(diào)劑,接受跨專業(yè)調(diào)劑! +3 | 閑魚盧 2026-03-31 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料專碩調(diào)劑 +12 | 椰椰。 2026-03-29 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 323分 食品與營養(yǎng)調(diào)劑 +3 | 嘿ooo 2026-03-31 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 335求調(diào)劑 +3 | 321* 2026-03-31 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中海洋320化學(xué)工程與技術(shù)學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑 +8 | 披星河 2026-03-30 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工調(diào)劑一志愿大連海事085600,349 +6 | 吃的不少 2026-03-30 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 370求調(diào)劑 +3 | 080700調(diào)劑 2026-03-30 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 福建理工大學(xué)材料學(xué)院先進(jìn)合金團(tuán)隊(duì)招收考研調(diào)劑學(xué)生 +3 | 大華金商都 2026-03-30 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 085601材料工程找調(diào)劑 +17 | oatmealR 2026-03-29 | 18/900 |
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +10 | lin0039 2026-03-26 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 298求調(diào)劑 +3 | 種圣賜 2026-03-29 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +6 | 曼殊2266 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 283求調(diào)劑 +7 | A child 2026-03-28 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 295求調(diào)劑 +5 | 1428151015 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 打過很多競(jìng)賽,085406控制工程300分,求調(diào)劑 +3 | askeladz 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|