| 查看: 8074 | 回復(fù): 23 | ||||
zhangjishi金蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
剛收到SCI期刊的審稿意見,如何回答審稿人?
|
|||
|
第一篇SCi投稿,今天剛剛收到審稿意見。共有3個(gè)審稿人。前2個(gè)的問題基本都是些小問題,但是第三個(gè)審稿的意見本人覺得不好解決,有拒稿的意思。請(qǐng)各位大俠指點(diǎn)。以下是第三個(gè)審稿人的意見: Reviewer: 3 >Comments to the Author >The ideas in the paper are interesting and the theoretic results obtained have some potential in applications. However, the paper is poorly written and the organization needs a big improvement, although the results are globally technically correct. Therefore, this reviewer does not recomend its acceptance as a full paper at this stage. > >1. The motivation of wide practical use of the theoretic results presented should be clearly emphasized. At this stage, it is not quite clear to the reviewer. > >2. As similar problem in the paper has been studied by others in the past, so the unique features of the approaches proposed and the main advantages of the results over others have to be clearly commented and shown. > >3. The example used to demonstrate the main results need to be improved. More remarks should be given to the figures to clearly demonstrate the effectiveness of the obtained results. > >4. The paper also has some typos and language issue which needs to be checked and corrected in the revision. > >5. It seems that all the techniques used to solve the problems have been proposed in literature. What are the difficultis when dealing with these problems. The authors fail to illustrate this point clearly. Considering this, this reviewer thinks that the paper better be shortened and reorganized as a brief paper. |
SCI寫作經(jīng)驗(yàn)交流 | 英文論文投稿 |
超級(jí)版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +21105 |
鐵桿木蟲 (正式寫手)

木蟲 (著名寫手)
|
首先恭喜樓主,有修改的機(jī)會(huì)。 感覺命運(yùn)和我差不多,我也是之前收到的大修建議,3個(gè)審稿人, 尤其是第三個(gè)給的評(píng)價(jià)不高, 而且我也一條和樓主第二條一樣的意見,而且審稿人還給出了篇文章叫我去看。(我看了也不覺得是他說的那樣類似),而且同一個(gè)領(lǐng)域的東西,尤其是工程方面,都是很類似的(個(gè)人就覺得是不是審稿人想讓我引用他的文章,頭疼中。。。)。 我也想借樓主的貼問下大家。 審稿人的意見是不是要盡量采納啊, 還是能反駁盡量反駁。(個(gè)人覺得都按照審稿人的意見去走,會(huì)不會(huì)人家(尤其是編輯)覺得學(xué)術(shù)做的沒有主心骨。浚 |
鐵桿木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
|
Q: 第一篇SCi投稿,今天剛剛收到審稿意見。共有3個(gè)審稿人。前2個(gè)的問題基本都是些小問題,但是第三個(gè)審稿的意見本人覺得不好解決,有拒稿的意思。請(qǐng)各位大俠指點(diǎn)。以下是第三個(gè)審稿人的意見: A: 共 5條意見~ 根據(jù)逐條意見~去修改你的本文~ 1,3,4 點(diǎn)是基本問題~ 2,5 是樓主進(jìn)一步思考的問題~ 編輯對(duì)你算是比較好的~ 給你有修改的機(jī)會(huì)~ 不然~換做其他的 editor, 早 reject 了~ 祝福樓主~ 樓主加油~ |

至尊木蟲 (知名作家)
無助又無奈

木蟲之王 (文學(xué)泰斗)
藍(lán)博士

專家顧問 (文壇精英)
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +584 |

銀蟲 (正式寫手)

至尊木蟲 (知名作家)

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 安徽大學(xué)專碩生物與醫(yī)藥專業(yè)(086000)324分,英語已過四六級(jí),六級(jí)521,求調(diào)劑 +7 | 美味可樂雞翅 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 070300化學(xué)354求調(diào)劑 +13 | 101次希望 2026-03-28 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿大連理工大學(xué),機(jī)械工程學(xué)碩,341 +3 | 西瓜田的守望者 2026-03-30 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 合肥區(qū)域性重點(diǎn)一本招收調(diào)劑 +4 | 6266jl 2026-03-30 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 281求調(diào)劑 +5 | 亞克西good 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 085600 材料與化工 329分求調(diào)劑 +18 | Mr. Z 2026-03-25 | 19/950 |
|
|
[考研] 284求調(diào)劑 +14 | junqihahaha 2026-03-26 | 15/750 |
|
|
[考研] 0703本科鄭州大學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +7 | nhj_ 2026-03-25 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 332求調(diào)劑 +6 | Lyy930824@ 2026-03-29 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 070305高分子化學(xué)與物理 304分求調(diào)劑 +12 | c297914 2026-03-28 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研]
|
y7czhao 2026-03-26 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 275求調(diào)劑 +10 | jjjjjjjjjjl 2026-03-27 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 265求調(diào)劑 +8 | 小木蟲085600 2026-03-27 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 086000調(diào)劑 +3 | 7901117076 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿上海理工能源動(dòng)力(085800)310分求調(diào)劑 +3 | zhangmingc 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +4 | 零八# 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研]
|
18419759900 2026-03-25 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 085601 材料工程 313分 求調(diào)劑 +5 | Ong3 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑推薦 +5 | 清酒714 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 機(jī)械學(xué)碩310分,數(shù)一英一,一志愿211本科雙非找調(diào)劑信息 +3 | @357 2026-03-25 | 3/150 |
|