| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 8077 | 回復(fù): 23 | ||||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||||
zhangjishi金蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
剛收到SCI期刊的審稿意見,如何回答審稿人?
|
|||
|
第一篇SCi投稿,今天剛剛收到審稿意見。共有3個(gè)審稿人。前2個(gè)的問題基本都是些小問題,但是第三個(gè)審稿的意見本人覺得不好解決,有拒稿的意思。請(qǐng)各位大俠指點(diǎn)。以下是第三個(gè)審稿人的意見: Reviewer: 3 >Comments to the Author >The ideas in the paper are interesting and the theoretic results obtained have some potential in applications. However, the paper is poorly written and the organization needs a big improvement, although the results are globally technically correct. Therefore, this reviewer does not recomend its acceptance as a full paper at this stage. > >1. The motivation of wide practical use of the theoretic results presented should be clearly emphasized. At this stage, it is not quite clear to the reviewer. > >2. As similar problem in the paper has been studied by others in the past, so the unique features of the approaches proposed and the main advantages of the results over others have to be clearly commented and shown. > >3. The example used to demonstrate the main results need to be improved. More remarks should be given to the figures to clearly demonstrate the effectiveness of the obtained results. > >4. The paper also has some typos and language issue which needs to be checked and corrected in the revision. > >5. It seems that all the techniques used to solve the problems have been proposed in literature. What are the difficultis when dealing with these problems. The authors fail to illustrate this point clearly. Considering this, this reviewer thinks that the paper better be shortened and reorganized as a brief paper. |
SCI寫作經(jīng)驗(yàn)交流 | 英文論文投稿 |
超級(jí)版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +21105 |
木蟲 (著名寫手)
|
首先恭喜樓主,有修改的機(jī)會(huì)。 感覺命運(yùn)和我差不多,我也是之前收到的大修建議,3個(gè)審稿人, 尤其是第三個(gè)給的評(píng)價(jià)不高, 而且我也一條和樓主第二條一樣的意見,而且審稿人還給出了篇文章叫我去看。(我看了也不覺得是他說的那樣類似),而且同一個(gè)領(lǐng)域的東西,尤其是工程方面,都是很類似的(個(gè)人就覺得是不是審稿人想讓我引用他的文章,頭疼中。。。)。 我也想借樓主的貼問下大家。 審稿人的意見是不是要盡量采納啊, 還是能反駁盡量反駁。(個(gè)人覺得都按照審稿人的意見去走,會(huì)不會(huì)人家(尤其是編輯)覺得學(xué)術(shù)做的沒有主心骨啊?) |
鐵桿木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
|
Q: 第一篇SCi投稿,今天剛剛收到審稿意見。共有3個(gè)審稿人。前2個(gè)的問題基本都是些小問題,但是第三個(gè)審稿的意見本人覺得不好解決,有拒稿的意思。請(qǐng)各位大俠指點(diǎn)。以下是第三個(gè)審稿人的意見: A: 共 5條意見~ 根據(jù)逐條意見~去修改你的本文~ 1,3,4 點(diǎn)是基本問題~ 2,5 是樓主進(jìn)一步思考的問題~ 編輯對(duì)你算是比較好的~ 給你有修改的機(jī)會(huì)~ 不然~換做其他的 editor, 早 reject 了~ 祝福樓主~ 樓主加油~ |

至尊木蟲 (知名作家)
無助又無奈

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0856材料與化工調(diào)劑,339 +6 | 10213207 2026-03-31 | 6/300 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 070300化學(xué)279求調(diào)劑 +9 | 哈哈哈^_^ 2026-03-31 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 085601英二數(shù)二求調(diào)劑 總分325 +4 | 余航航 2026-03-31 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 0710生物學(xué)求調(diào)劑! +5 | 敘述文 2026-03-31 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 315求調(diào)劑 +6 | akie... 2026-03-28 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研]
|
nnnnnnn5 2026-03-25 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿085600中科院寧波所276分求調(diào)劑 +12 | 材料學(xué)257求調(diào)劑 2026-03-28 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 生物學(xué) 296 求調(diào)劑 +7 | 朵朵- 2026-03-26 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 354求調(diào)劑 +3 | lxb598 2026-03-31 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南昌大學(xué)324求調(diào)劑 +6 | hanamiko 2026-03-30 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿西電085401數(shù)一英一299求調(diào)劑 六級(jí)521 +4 | 愛吃大鴨梨 2026-03-31 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑求院校招收 +7 | 鶴鯨鴿 2026-03-28 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 南京大學(xué)化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +11 | 景隨風(fēng) 2026-03-29 | 16/800 |
|
|
[考研] 303求調(diào)劑 +7 | DLkz1314. 2026-03-30 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 0703一志愿9,初試成績(jī):338,四六級(jí)已過,有科研經(jīng)歷,求調(diào)劑! +7 | Zuhui0306 2026-03-25 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南開大學(xué)0710生物學(xué)359求調(diào)劑 +5 | 兔兔兔111223314 2026-03-29 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 334分 一志愿武理 材料求調(diào)劑 +16 | 李李不服輸 2026-03-26 | 16/800 |
|
|
[考研] 本科新能源科學(xué)與工程,一志愿華理能動(dòng)285求調(diào)劑 +7 | AZMK 2026-03-28 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工304求B區(qū)調(diào)劑 +3 | 邱gl 2026-03-25 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間安全0839招調(diào)劑 +4 | w320357296 2026-03-25 | 6/300 |
|