 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 查看: 5783 | 回復: 32 | |||
[求助]
SSCI大修后再送另一審稿人被拒，請大家?guī)涂匆幌乱庖?
|
|||
是SSCI，第一次審稿人(一位)給的大修。今日編輯回復拒稿了。 畢業(yè)要延期了。 大家?guī)涂匆幌隆Ｗ屑毣貜土松蟼�審稿人的意見，原想沒問題的，最不可能的料想卻發(fā)生了。It is my understanding that this paper has been returned with amendments to the journal. I have seen the list of corrections made and the final draft of the paper. I have been asked to make a decision on the publishability of this paper. This is actually quite an interesting research topic, although it is presented in a very poor manner. First, let me comment on the language. The paper is no where near publishable standard in an English language journal. There are many errors of all sorts. I am unable to list them as there are just too many. I would suggest that the paper should have been reviewed by an English language expert before being submitted to an English language journal. The competition for space in an English language academic journal is intense, and the language has to be near-perfect if the paper is to be seriously considered. The editor can made some changes, but not as many as appear in this paper. The second problem is the organization. The paper is a bit of a jumble. We have an introduction with some literature review, then a brief section on research methodology, then some more literature review. Re-organize and get the different parts sorted out. The research methodology is inadequate. We are told that a survey was done in 3 towns, but there is not explanation about how the 652 respondents were chosen, or what they were asked, or how the survey was carried out. This is important as otherwise it is impossible for the reader to judge the merit and reliability of the survey. Were random means chosen to select the respondents? How were they identified? Much of the explanation is inadequate. The term 'hometown' is thrown around quite loosely. It appears in the Highlights, in Table 1 and elsewhere, yet it is difficult to find a very precise definition of what the author means by this term. Table 3 is a very uninteresting way to present the results. Also, what justification is there to express the percentages in the results in hundredths of one per cent, especially when the survey itself is less than 1000 respondents? Tenths is the best you can do. Finally, what are the policy implications of the research? This appears to be just a survey, and description of the results, an application of some statistical results that are poorly presented, and that is all. What is the point of the research if one cannot change things for the better? Although there is promise here, this paper is so far away from publishable standard that I can only recommend rejection at this stage. |
回復此樓» 收錄本帖的淘帖專輯推薦
 論文投稿交流的收集 |
» 猜你喜歡
268求調劑
已經有8人回復
-
26申博
已經有4人回復
-
211本，11408一志愿中科院277分，曾在中科院自動化所實習
已經有7人回復
-
求調劑，總分315，考的生物醫(yī)藥，一志愿湖南師范大學。調劑到任何專業(yè)都可以
已經有3人回復
-
材料專碩306英一數(shù)二
已經有7人回復
-
材料工程專碩274一志愿211求調劑
已經有6人回復
-
一志愿南京大學，080500材料科學與工程，調劑
已經有4人回復
-
332求調劑
已經有5人回復
-
271求調劑
已經有14人回復
-
275求調劑
已經有4人回復
» 本主題相關價值貼推薦，對您同樣有幫助:
- 投稿PLOS one 大修，審稿人要求補實驗，不補的話被拒概率多少
已經有12人回復
- 大修后被編輯拒掉，重投會換審稿人嗎？
已經有13人回復
- 大修返回快20天，發(fā)現(xiàn)狀態(tài)是又重新分配了審稿人，是不是要被拒了？忑忑，擔心ing
已經有9人回復
- 論文大修后審稿人認為我沒有認真修改被拒，想寫申訴信，怎么寫比較合適
已經有5人回復
- 初審意見兩個審稿人，一個強調創(chuàng)新性不強，一個要求大修. 該 怎樣回復�。� 謝謝
已經有39人回復
- IOP大修后重投 審稿人一周返回意見 是悲是喜？
已經有9人回復
- 審稿人說大修，但是論文被拒，給編輯再發(fā)郵件申訴有用嗎 7.19 更新
已經有30人回復
- 有沒有兩個審稿人一個拒，一個大修，然后編輯reject但是可以resubmit
已經有16人回復
- 大修時對英語寫作做了相應修改，應該如何回復審稿人意見
已經有4人回復
- 兩審稿人給大修后重審，副主編卻給了個拒稿結論，我該咋辦？
已經有34人回復
- 投SCI大修，審稿人2個同意一個拒稿
已經有18人回復
guershao
至尊木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
- 應助: 91 (初中生)
- 金幣: 17204.2
- 散金: 1863
- 紅花: 10
- 帖子: 3246
- 在線: 1201.4小時
- 蟲號: 711670
- 注冊: 2009-03-01
- 專業(yè): 管理學其他學科
【答案】應助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感謝參與，應助指數(shù) +1
avast2009: 回帖置頂 2013-03-23 18:25:21
avast2009: 金幣+5, 鼓勵高質量應助 2013-03-23 18:25:46
感謝參與，應助指數(shù) +1
avast2009: 回帖置頂 2013-03-23 18:25:21
avast2009: 金幣+5, 鼓勵高質量應助 2013-03-23 18:25:46
|
1. 語法需要大的修改，找老板、英語好的人或者老外幫你修改一下語法，其實只要認真改過一次之后，以后都不存在這個問題了； 2. 文章的結構安排不合理，要前后有邏輯，首先是提出問題，然后提出研究假設等... 3. 方法方面存在欠缺，或者是沒有解釋清楚的問題，要交代清楚，或者有文獻進行佐證。 4. 人文社科的論文，要上升到政策層面，對關注相關問題層面的人提出相關的政策建議或者對策，或者你是研究的升華。 |
» 本帖已獲得的紅花（最新10朵）
hql1974
5樓2013-03-22 19:38:14
 |
2樓2013-03-22 18:13:40
sunpingli
金蟲 (小有名氣)
不知道
- 應助: 12 (小學生)
- 金幣: 2780.7
- 紅花: 1
- 帖子: 234
- 在線: 83小時
- 蟲號: 961460
- 注冊: 2010-03-04
- 性別: MM
- 專業(yè): 呼吸系統(tǒng)疾病其他科學問題
3樓2013-03-22 19:06:06
happy617
新蟲 (著名寫手)
- 應助: 59 (初中生)
- 金幣: 7682.1
- 散金: 5787
- 紅花: 15
- 帖子: 2238
- 在線: 690.8小時
- 蟲號: 1850867
- 注冊: 2012-06-07
- 專業(yè): 創(chuàng)新管理
4樓2013-03-22 19:24:11
mikefallon
木蟲 (小有名氣)
- 應助: 103 (高中生)
- 金幣: 4126.3
- 紅花: 5
- 帖子: 271
- 在線: 240.2小時
- 蟲號: 1446801
- 注冊: 2011-10-17
- 專業(yè): 零件成形制造
6樓2013-03-22 19:42:38
lqingh506
鐵桿木蟲 (知名作家)
- 應助: 314 (大學生)
- 金幣: 10859.9
- 散金: 1523
- 紅花: 75
- 帖子: 7623
- 在線: 3397.9小時
- 蟲號: 723546
- 注冊: 2009-03-15
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 無機非金屬類光電信息與功
7樓2013-03-22 19:55:49
 謝謝各位蟲友的解析，感激。大修改后自己和老師都較滿意(原想會令上個審稿人滿意)，不料又送了另一審稿人定奪，唉，挺受打擊的。紐結編輯怎么沒再給改的機會呢，自己覺得文章已改的可以了。挺無奈的。再請教一下：Table 3 is a very uninteresting way to present the results. Also, what justification is there to express the percentages in the results in hundredths of one per cent, especially when the survey itself is less than 1000 respondents? Tenths is the best you can do. 我用到535個樣本，回歸顯著性這樣標不可以嗎？ Notes: *
|
8樓2013-03-22 20:05:40
mlanqiang
木蟲之王 (文學泰斗)
藍博士
- 應助: 3409 (副教授)
- 金幣: 55278.8
- 散金: 5498
- 紅花: 62
- 帖子: 73916
- 在線: 730.8小時
- 蟲號: 302202
- 注冊: 2006-12-02
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 膠體與界面化學
9樓2013-03-22 20:11:59
謝謝相助，感覺到小木蟲的溫暖。努力修改。 10樓2013-03-22 21:53:32
相關版塊跳轉
我要訂閱樓主 hql1974 的主題更新
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[碩博家園] 深圳大學碩士招生（2026秋，傳感器方向，僅錄取第一志愿） +4 | xujiaoszu 2026-03-11 | 9/450 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 285化工學碩求調劑（081700） +9 | 柴郡貓_ 2026-03-12 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 293求調劑 +5 | 世界首富 2026-03-11 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[基金申請] 國自科面上基金字體 +6 | iwuli 2026-03-12 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085601求調劑 +3 | Du.11 2026-03-16 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 機械專碩325，尋找調劑院校 +3 | y9999 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0854控制工程 359求調劑 可跨專業(yè) +3 | 626776879 2026-03-14 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 285求調劑 +6 | ytter 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考博] 東華理工大學化材專業(yè)26屆碩士博士申請 +6 | zlingli 2026-03-13 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 070305求調劑 +3 | mlpqaz03 2026-03-14 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 331求調劑（0703有機化學 +5 | ZY-05 2026-03-13 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 308 085701 四六級已過求調劑 +7 | 溫喬喬喬喬 2026-03-12 | 14/700 |
|
|
|
[考研] 337一志愿華南理工0805材料求調劑 +7 | mysdl 2026-03-11 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 290求調劑 +9 | ADT 2026-03-11 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿西南交大，材料專碩317求調劑 +5 | lx8568 2026-03-11 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 【考研調劑求收留】 +3 | Ceciilia 2026-03-11 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 314求調劑 +7 | 無懈可擊的巨人 2026-03-12 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 308求調劑 +3 | 是Lupa啊 2026-03-12 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考博] 福州大學楊黃浩課題組招收2026年專業(yè)學位博士研究生，2026.03.20截止 +3 | Xiangyu_ou 2026-03-12 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考博] 2026年博士申請 +3 | QwQwQW10 2026-03-11 | 3/150 |
|