 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 5831 | 回復(fù): 32 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
SSCI大修后再送另一審稿人被拒，請(qǐng)大家?guī)涂匆幌乱庖?jiàn)
|
|||
是SSCI，第一次審稿人(一位)給的大修。今日編輯回復(fù)拒稿了。 畢業(yè)要延期了。 大家?guī)涂匆幌�。仔�?xì)回復(fù)了上個(gè)審稿人的意見(jiàn)，原想沒(méi)問(wèn)題的，最不可能的料想?yún)s發(fā)生了。It is my understanding that this paper has been returned with amendments to the journal. I have seen the list of corrections made and the final draft of the paper. I have been asked to make a decision on the publishability of this paper. This is actually quite an interesting research topic, although it is presented in a very poor manner. First, let me comment on the language. The paper is no where near publishable standard in an English language journal. There are many errors of all sorts. I am unable to list them as there are just too many. I would suggest that the paper should have been reviewed by an English language expert before being submitted to an English language journal. The competition for space in an English language academic journal is intense, and the language has to be near-perfect if the paper is to be seriously considered. The editor can made some changes, but not as many as appear in this paper. The second problem is the organization. The paper is a bit of a jumble. We have an introduction with some literature review, then a brief section on research methodology, then some more literature review. Re-organize and get the different parts sorted out. The research methodology is inadequate. We are told that a survey was done in 3 towns, but there is not explanation about how the 652 respondents were chosen, or what they were asked, or how the survey was carried out. This is important as otherwise it is impossible for the reader to judge the merit and reliability of the survey. Were random means chosen to select the respondents? How were they identified? Much of the explanation is inadequate. The term 'hometown' is thrown around quite loosely. It appears in the Highlights, in Table 1 and elsewhere, yet it is difficult to find a very precise definition of what the author means by this term. Table 3 is a very uninteresting way to present the results. Also, what justification is there to express the percentages in the results in hundredths of one per cent, especially when the survey itself is less than 1000 respondents? Tenths is the best you can do. Finally, what are the policy implications of the research? This appears to be just a survey, and description of the results, an application of some statistical results that are poorly presented, and that is all. What is the point of the research if one cannot change things for the better? Although there is promise here, this paper is so far away from publishable standard that I can only recommend rejection at this stage. |
回復(fù)此樓» 收錄本帖的淘帖專輯推薦
 論文投稿交流的收集 |
» 猜你喜歡
326求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
-
333求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
一志愿東華大學(xué)控制學(xué)碩320求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
考研化學(xué)學(xué)碩調(diào)劑，一志愿985
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
化學(xué)工程321分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有21人回復(fù)
-
0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有15人回復(fù)
-
0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 ，六級(jí)已過(guò)，有科研經(jīng)歷
已經(jīng)有14人回復(fù)
-
326求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
311求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有13人回復(fù)
-
311求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)價(jià)值貼推薦，對(duì)您同樣有幫助:
- 投稿PLOS one 大修，審稿人要求補(bǔ)實(shí)驗(yàn)，不補(bǔ)的話被拒概率多少
已經(jīng)有12人回復(fù)
- 大修后被編輯拒掉，重投會(huì)換審稿人嗎？
已經(jīng)有13人回復(fù)
- 大修返回快20天，發(fā)現(xiàn)狀態(tài)是又重新分配了審稿人，是不是要被拒了？忑忑，擔(dān)心ing
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
- 論文大修后審稿人認(rèn)為我沒(méi)有認(rèn)真修改被拒，想寫申訴信，怎么寫比較合適
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- 初審意見(jiàn)兩個(gè)審稿人，一個(gè)強(qiáng)調(diào)創(chuàng)新性不強(qiáng)，一個(gè)要求大修. 該 怎樣回復(fù)��？ 謝謝
已經(jīng)有39人回復(fù)
- IOP大修后重投 審稿人一周返回意見(jiàn) 是悲是喜？
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
- 審稿人說(shuō)大修，但是論文被拒，給編輯再發(fā)郵件申訴有用嗎 7.19 更新
已經(jīng)有30人回復(fù)
- 有沒(méi)有兩個(gè)審稿人一個(gè)拒，一個(gè)大修，然后編輯reject但是可以resubmit
已經(jīng)有16人回復(fù)
- 大修時(shí)對(duì)英語(yǔ)寫作做了相應(yīng)修改，應(yīng)該如何回復(fù)審稿人意見(jiàn)
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
- 兩審稿人給大修后重審，副主編卻給了個(gè)拒稿結(jié)論，我該咋辦？
已經(jīng)有34人回復(fù)
- 投SCI大修，審稿人2個(gè)同意一個(gè)拒稿
已經(jīng)有18人回復(fù)
sunpingli
金蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
不知道
- 應(yīng)助: 12 (小學(xué)生)
- 金幣: 2780.7
- 紅花: 1
- 帖子: 234
- 在線: 83小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 961460
- 注冊(cè): 2010-03-04
- 性別: MM
- 專業(yè): 呼吸系統(tǒng)疾病其他科學(xué)問(wèn)題
3樓2013-03-22 19:06:06
happy617
新蟲(chóng) (著名寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 59 (初中生)
- 金幣: 7682.1
- 散金: 5787
- 紅花: 15
- 帖子: 2238
- 在線: 690.8小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 1850867
- 注冊(cè): 2012-06-07
- 專業(yè): 創(chuàng)新管理
4樓2013-03-22 19:24:11
guershao
至尊木蟲(chóng) (職業(yè)作家)
- 應(yīng)助: 91 (初中生)
- 金幣: 17204.2
- 散金: 1863
- 紅花: 10
- 帖子: 3246
- 在線: 1201.4小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 711670
- 注冊(cè): 2009-03-01
- 專業(yè): 管理學(xué)其他學(xué)科
【答案】應(yīng)助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感謝參與，應(yīng)助指數(shù) +1
avast2009: 回帖置頂 2013-03-23 18:25:21
avast2009: 金幣+5, 鼓勵(lì)高質(zhì)量應(yīng)助 2013-03-23 18:25:46
感謝參與，應(yīng)助指數(shù) +1
avast2009: 回帖置頂 2013-03-23 18:25:21
avast2009: 金幣+5, 鼓勵(lì)高質(zhì)量應(yīng)助 2013-03-23 18:25:46
|
1. 語(yǔ)法需要大的修改，找老板、英語(yǔ)好的人或者老外幫你修改一下語(yǔ)法，其實(shí)只要認(rèn)真改過(guò)一次之后，以后都不存在這個(gè)問(wèn)題了； 2. 文章的結(jié)構(gòu)安排不合理，要前后有邏輯，首先是提出問(wèn)題，然后提出研究假設(shè)等... 3. 方法方面存在欠缺，或者是沒(méi)有解釋清楚的問(wèn)題，要交代清楚，或者有文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行佐證。 4. 人文社科的論文，要上升到政策層面，對(duì)關(guān)注相關(guān)問(wèn)題層面的人提出相關(guān)的政策建議或者對(duì)策，或者你是研究的升華。 |
» 本帖已獲得的紅花（最新10朵）
hql19745樓2013-03-22 19:38:14
mikefallon
木蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
- 應(yīng)助: 103 (高中生)
- 金幣: 4126.3
- 紅花: 5
- 帖子: 271
- 在線: 240.2小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 1446801
- 注冊(cè): 2011-10-17
- 專業(yè): 零件成形制造
6樓2013-03-22 19:42:38
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 326求調(diào)劑 +5 | 諾貝爾化學(xué)獎(jiǎng)覬?/a> 2026-03-15 | 8/400 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿深大，0703化學(xué)，總分302，求調(diào)劑 +4 | 七月-七七 2026-03-21 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 280求調(diào)劑 +10 | 咕嚕曉曉 2026-03-18 | 11/550 |
|
|
|
[考研] 279分求調(diào)劑 一志愿211 +14 | chaojifeixia 2026-03-19 | 15/750 |
|
|
|
[考研] 332求調(diào)劑 +3 | 鳳凰院丁真 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085601調(diào)劑 358分 +3 | zzzzggh 2026-03-20 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 能源材料化學(xué)課題組招收碩士研究生8-10名 +5 | 脫穎而出 2026-03-16 | 15/750 |
|
|
|
[考研] 303求調(diào)劑 +5 | 睿08 2026-03-17 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +3 | Ma_xt 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑一志愿南京航空航天大學(xué)289分 +3 | @taotao 2026-03-19 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿 南京航空航天大學(xué)大學(xué) ，080500材料科學(xué)與工程學(xué)碩 +5 | @taotao 2026-03-20 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 319求調(diào)劑 +3 | 小力氣珂珂 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085410人工智能專碩317求調(diào)劑（0854都可以） +4 | xbxudjdn 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 生物學(xué)調(diào)劑招人！��！ +3 | 山海天嵐 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工求調(diào)劑 +7 | 為學(xué)666 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿985，本科211，0817化學(xué)工程與技術(shù)319求調(diào)劑 +10 | Liwangman 2026-03-15 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料工程專碩調(diào)劑 +5 | 204818@lcx 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 考研求調(diào)劑 +3 | 橘頌. 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[碩博家園] 湖北工業(yè)大學(xué) 生命科學(xué)與健康學(xué)院-課題組招收2026級(jí)食品/生物方向碩士 +3 | 1喜春8 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南京大學(xué)，080500材料科學(xué)與工程，調(diào)劑 +4 | Jy? 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|