 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 8 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1424 | 回復(fù): 7 | |||
| 當(dāng)前主題已經(jīng)存檔。 | |||
[交流]
驗(yàn)證與確認(rèn)的區(qū)別
|
|||
| validation and qualification ，一般都有驗(yàn)證和確認(rèn)的意思，既然老外將其分開，那么在翻譯為中文的時候就應(yīng)該將其區(qū)分開，請問應(yīng)該翻譯為什么意思，都適用于那些方面？ |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
071000生物學(xué)求調(diào)劑，初試成績343
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑，求導(dǎo)師收
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
-
0856材料化工調(diào)劑 總分330
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
-
本科新能源科學(xué)與工程，一志愿華理能動285求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
-
332求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
085600，專業(yè)課化工原理，321分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
材料工程294求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
295材料工程專碩求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
305求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
食品工程專碩一志愿中海洋309求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
2樓2007-11-12 09:48:22
★ ★ ★
tianruibencao(金幣+3,VIP+0):感謝你的分享
tianruibencao(金幣+3,VIP+0):感謝你的分享
|
Qualification: 合格, 鑒定, 判定, 合格證明[證書], 認(rèn)證，資格證明書 verification 確認(rèn), 證實(shí)[明, 據(jù)] validation 驗(yàn)證 2000版ISO9001標(biāo)準(zhǔn)： 3.8.4 驗(yàn)證 verification 通過提供客觀證據(jù)(3.8.1)對規(guī)定要求(3.1.2)已得到滿足的認(rèn)定 注1：“已驗(yàn)證”一詞用于表示相應(yīng)的狀態(tài)。 注2：認(rèn)定可包括下述活動，如： ——變換方法進(jìn)行計算； ——將新設(shè)計規(guī)范(3.7.3)與已證實(shí)的類似設(shè)計規(guī)范進(jìn)行比較； ——進(jìn)行試驗(yàn)(3.8.3)和演示； ——文件發(fā)布前的評審。 3.8.5 確認(rèn) validation 通過提供客觀證據(jù)(3.8.1)對特定的預(yù)期用途或應(yīng)用要求(3.1.2)已得到滿足的認(rèn)定 注1：“已確認(rèn)”一詞用于表示相應(yīng)的狀態(tài)。 注2：確認(rèn)所使用的條件可以是實(shí)際的或是模擬的。 3.8.6 鑒定過程 qualification process 證實(shí)滿足規(guī)定要求(3.1.2)的能力的過程(3.4.1) 注1：“已鑒定”一詞用于表示相應(yīng)的狀態(tài)。 注2：鑒定可涉及到人員、產(chǎn)品(3.4.2)、過程或體系(3.2.1)。 示例：審核員鑒定過程、材料鑒定過程。 |
3樓2007-11-12 13:03:31
Differences: Verification, Validation, Calibration and Qualification
|
In Pharmaceutical Indusdry: (因?yàn)椴煌袠I(yè)有不同的解釋） Verification and Validation (V&V) is the process of checking that a product, service, or system meets specifications and that it fulfills its intended purpose. These are critical components of a quality management system such as ISO 9000. Verification is a quality process used to evaluate whether or not a product, service, or system complies with a regulation, specification, or conditions imposed at the start of a development phase. Verification can be in development, scale-up, or production. This is often an internal process. Validation is the process of establishing documented evidence that provides a high degree of assurance that a product, service, or system accomplishes its intended requirements. This often involves acceptance and suitability with external customers. http://www.fda.gov/CDER/GUIDANCE/pv.htm Guideline on General Principles of Process Validation Prospective validation - Validation conducted prior to the distribution of either a new product, or product made under a revised manufacturing process, where the revisions may affect the product's characteristics. Retrospective validation - Validation of a process for a product already in distribution based upon accumulated production, testing and control data. Validation & Calibration: http://www.fda.com/forum/showtopic.php?tid/3496/ Validation: According to FDA glossary, it is "establishing documented evidence which provides a high degree of assurance that a specific process will consistently produce a product meeting its predetermined specifications and quality attributes". Calibration: According to the National of Standards and Technology, Calibration is a measurement process that assigns values to the property of an artifact or to the response of an instrument relative to reference standards or to a designated measurement process. The purpose of calibration is to eliminate or reduce bias in the user's measurement system relative to the reference base. The calibration procedure compares an "unknown" or test item(s) or instrument with reference standards according to a specific algorithm. Performance qualification is defined for processes, products and computer systems slightly differently. In your case, probably the definitions in the FDA guidelines for process validation fit best, where it states that "Process performance qualification - Establishing confidence that the process is effective and reproducible". But in simpler words: Validation is the job to create the specifications and then to qualify your process (or whatever you have) including the documentation thereof. Qualification is the process of the actual testing that you perform during validation. And calibration is something you have to do routinely (often specified during validation as well) to keep your instruments accurate with respect to a standard (and therefore validated). validation means documenting to prove suitable for intended purpose and it is generally accepted, following the V model, that this means: DQ URS, FRS, Design IQ OQ PQ is confirming the URS Maintain Train Change control. Calibration is an activity that adjusts a device tool or what ever to correlate its reading to another device which could be an international traceable standard. Confirmation of the calibration can be covered in part of the validation work. All validation work has to be scaled to the system / equipment in question, but should follow the general V model principles. For small hand tools that require calibrating I have created a URS, done a calibration. A small hand tool is not installed anywhere ergo no IQ. The fact that it has been calibrated means that it must function OK this can be the OQ. The PQ confirms that the URS has ben met , so what ever was described as required has be satisfied this can be all manner of odds and ends like power compatibility ease of use etc. Qualification: DQ/IQ/OQ/PQ Installation qualification - Establishing confidence that process equipment and ancillary systems are capable of consistently operating within established limits and tolerances. Process performance qualification - Establishing confidence that the process is effective and reproducible. Product performance qualification - Establishing confidence through appropriate testing that the finished product produced by a specified process meets all release requirements for functionality and safety. [ Last edited by penn007 on 2007-11-12 at 14:24 ] |
4樓2007-11-12 13:13:04
Analytical Instrument Qualification
★
karl2100(金幣+1,VIP+0):多謝提供！
karl2100(金幣+1,VIP+0):多謝提供！
|
http://mediwire.skyscape.com/mai ... mp;ArticleID=187972 As mentioned earlier, processes are "validated" and instruments are "qualified." Analytical instrument qualification (AIQ) provides documented evidence that the instrument performs suitably for its intended purpose and that it is properly maintained and calibrated. Qualification normally is grouped into four distinct phases, design qualification (DQ), installation qualification (IQ), operational qualification (OQ), and performance qualification (PQ). A definition and discussion of each of the qualification phases have been covered in previous "Validation Viewpoint" columns and elsewhere and really do not need to be repeated here (2,14). The AAPS publication also does an excellent job of capturing the definition and documentation of each of these phases as well, as an excellent discussion on software validation to which the reader is referred for more information (3). However, there are a couple of other significant areas that the AAPS group focused on that are worth noting; documentation and the categorization of instruments according to the level of qualification required. Both static and dynamic documentation can result from an AIQ. Static documents are generated during the DQ, IQ, and OQ phases and should be kept in a separate qualification binder. Static documents can include such things as user manuals, site requirement documents, etc. Dynamic documents are generated during the OQ and PQ phases, when actual instrument testing takes place. These documents provide a running record for the instrument use and maintenance and should be kept in a system log book with the instrument, available for viewing as necessary by anyone interested (that is, the FDA). These documents also should be appropriately archived for future reference and protection. Instruments were placed into three categories (A, B, and C), again based upon their complexity and proposed level of qualification. The conformance of Group A instruments to user requirements is determined by visual observation; no independent qualification process is required. Examples of Group A instruments include spatulas, ovens, magnetic stirrers, microscopes, and vortex mixers. The conformance of Group B instruments to user requirements is determined according to the instruments' SOP, and their failure usually is readily discernable. Examples of instruments that fall into this category are pH meters, balances, thermometers, refrigerator–freezers, and vacuum ovens. Group C instruments are defined as highly method-specific, complex instruments with conformance determined by their application. Full qualification as outlined in the AAPS report is applied to instruments in this group. Examples include high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and gas chromatography (GC) instruments, spectrometers, mass spectrometers, and electron microscopes. [ Last edited by penn007 on 2007-11-12 at 14:23 ] |
5樓2007-11-12 13:56:28
6樓2007-11-14 14:00:49
7樓2007-11-14 14:24:02
8樓2007-11-14 14:31:01
相關(guān)版塊跳轉(zhuǎn)
我要訂閱樓主 滄智 的主題更新
| 8 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 復(fù)試調(diào)劑 +3 | raojunqi0129 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 346求調(diào)劑 一志愿070303有機(jī)化學(xué) +3 | 蘿卜燉青菜 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 299求調(diào)劑 +7 | 嗯嗯嗯嗯2 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085701環(huán)境工程，267求調(diào)劑 +16 | minht 2026-03-26 | 16/800 |
|
|
|
[考研] 339求調(diào)劑，想調(diào)回江蘇 +6 | 烤麥芽 2026-03-27 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 286求調(diào)劑 +4 | 丟掉懶惰 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[材料工程] 一志愿C9材料與化工專業(yè)總分300求調(diào)劑 +8 | 曼111 2026-03-24 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +3 | 希望上岸阿小楊 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 266分求材料化工冶金礦業(yè)等專業(yè)的調(diào)劑 +4 | 哇呼哼呼哼 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料292調(diào)劑 +12 | 橘頌思美人 2026-03-23 | 12/600 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085600，材料與化工321分調(diào)劑 +4 | 大饞小子 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 348求調(diào)劑 +4 | 小懶蟲不懶了 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[碩博家園] 招收生物學(xué)/細(xì)胞生物學(xué)調(diào)劑 +3 | IceGuo 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 349求調(diào)劑 +4 | 李木子啊哈哈 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 352求調(diào)劑 +4 | 大米飯！ 2026-03-22 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 318求調(diào)劑 +3 | plum李子 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 300分，材料，求調(diào)劑，英一數(shù)二 +5 | 超贊的 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料專碩找調(diào)劑 +5 | 哈哈哈吼吼吼哈 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 300求調(diào)劑，材料科學(xué)英一數(shù)二 +5 | leaflight 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿吉大化學(xué)322求調(diào)劑 +4 | 17501029541 2026-03-23 | 6/300 |
|