 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1425 | 回復(fù): 7 | |||
| 當(dāng)前主題已經(jīng)存檔。 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
驗(yàn)證與確認(rèn)的區(qū)別
|
|||
| validation and qualification ，一般都有驗(yàn)證和確認(rèn)的意思，既然老外將其分開，那么在翻譯為中文的時(shí)候就應(yīng)該將其區(qū)分開，請(qǐng)問應(yīng)該翻譯為什么意思，都適用于那些方面？ |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
一志愿河北工業(yè)大學(xué)0817化工278分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有15人回復(fù)
-
085601材料工程找調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有15人回復(fù)
-
材料與化工272求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有15人回復(fù)
-
085600 286分 材料求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
-
南京大學(xué)化學(xué)調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有14人回復(fù)
-
一志愿北京工業(yè)大學(xué)，324分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
281求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
26申博自薦
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
一志愿哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)材料與化工方向336分
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
★ ★ ★
tianruibencao(金幣+3,VIP+0):感謝你的分享
tianruibencao(金幣+3,VIP+0):感謝你的分享
|
Qualification: 合格, 鑒定, 判定, 合格證明[證書], 認(rèn)證，資格證明書 verification 確認(rèn), 證實(shí)[明, 據(jù)] validation 驗(yàn)證 2000版ISO9001標(biāo)準(zhǔn)： 3.8.4 驗(yàn)證 verification 通過提供客觀證據(jù)(3.8.1)對(duì)規(guī)定要求(3.1.2)已得到滿足的認(rèn)定 注1：“已驗(yàn)證”一詞用于表示相應(yīng)的狀態(tài)。 注2：認(rèn)定可包括下述活動(dòng)，如： ——變換方法進(jìn)行計(jì)算； ——將新設(shè)計(jì)規(guī)范(3.7.3)與已證實(shí)的類似設(shè)計(jì)規(guī)范進(jìn)行比較； ——進(jìn)行試驗(yàn)(3.8.3)和演示； ——文件發(fā)布前的評(píng)審。 3.8.5 確認(rèn) validation 通過提供客觀證據(jù)(3.8.1)對(duì)特定的預(yù)期用途或應(yīng)用要求(3.1.2)已得到滿足的認(rèn)定 注1：“已確認(rèn)”一詞用于表示相應(yīng)的狀態(tài)。 注2：確認(rèn)所使用的條件可以是實(shí)際的或是模擬的。 3.8.6 鑒定過程 qualification process 證實(shí)滿足規(guī)定要求(3.1.2)的能力的過程(3.4.1) 注1：“已鑒定”一詞用于表示相應(yīng)的狀態(tài)。 注2：鑒定可涉及到人員、產(chǎn)品(3.4.2)、過程或體系(3.2.1)。 示例：審核員鑒定過程、材料鑒定過程。 |
3樓2007-11-12 13:03:31
2樓2007-11-12 09:48:22
Differences: Verification, Validation, Calibration and Qualification
|
In Pharmaceutical Indusdry: (因?yàn)椴煌袠I(yè)有不同的解釋） Verification and Validation (V&V) is the process of checking that a product, service, or system meets specifications and that it fulfills its intended purpose. These are critical components of a quality management system such as ISO 9000. Verification is a quality process used to evaluate whether or not a product, service, or system complies with a regulation, specification, or conditions imposed at the start of a development phase. Verification can be in development, scale-up, or production. This is often an internal process. Validation is the process of establishing documented evidence that provides a high degree of assurance that a product, service, or system accomplishes its intended requirements. This often involves acceptance and suitability with external customers. http://www.fda.gov/CDER/GUIDANCE/pv.htm Guideline on General Principles of Process Validation Prospective validation - Validation conducted prior to the distribution of either a new product, or product made under a revised manufacturing process, where the revisions may affect the product's characteristics. Retrospective validation - Validation of a process for a product already in distribution based upon accumulated production, testing and control data. Validation & Calibration: http://www.fda.com/forum/showtopic.php?tid/3496/ Validation: According to FDA glossary, it is "establishing documented evidence which provides a high degree of assurance that a specific process will consistently produce a product meeting its predetermined specifications and quality attributes". Calibration: According to the National of Standards and Technology, Calibration is a measurement process that assigns values to the property of an artifact or to the response of an instrument relative to reference standards or to a designated measurement process. The purpose of calibration is to eliminate or reduce bias in the user's measurement system relative to the reference base. The calibration procedure compares an "unknown" or test item(s) or instrument with reference standards according to a specific algorithm. Performance qualification is defined for processes, products and computer systems slightly differently. In your case, probably the definitions in the FDA guidelines for process validation fit best, where it states that "Process performance qualification - Establishing confidence that the process is effective and reproducible". But in simpler words: Validation is the job to create the specifications and then to qualify your process (or whatever you have) including the documentation thereof. Qualification is the process of the actual testing that you perform during validation. And calibration is something you have to do routinely (often specified during validation as well) to keep your instruments accurate with respect to a standard (and therefore validated). validation means documenting to prove suitable for intended purpose and it is generally accepted, following the V model, that this means: DQ URS, FRS, Design IQ OQ PQ is confirming the URS Maintain Train Change control. Calibration is an activity that adjusts a device tool or what ever to correlate its reading to another device which could be an international traceable standard. Confirmation of the calibration can be covered in part of the validation work. All validation work has to be scaled to the system / equipment in question, but should follow the general V model principles. For small hand tools that require calibrating I have created a URS, done a calibration. A small hand tool is not installed anywhere ergo no IQ. The fact that it has been calibrated means that it must function OK this can be the OQ. The PQ confirms that the URS has ben met , so what ever was described as required has be satisfied this can be all manner of odds and ends like power compatibility ease of use etc. Qualification: DQ/IQ/OQ/PQ Installation qualification - Establishing confidence that process equipment and ancillary systems are capable of consistently operating within established limits and tolerances. Process performance qualification - Establishing confidence that the process is effective and reproducible. Product performance qualification - Establishing confidence through appropriate testing that the finished product produced by a specified process meets all release requirements for functionality and safety. [ Last edited by penn007 on 2007-11-12 at 14:24 ] |
4樓2007-11-12 13:13:04
Analytical Instrument Qualification
★
karl2100(金幣+1,VIP+0):多謝提供！
karl2100(金幣+1,VIP+0):多謝提供！
|
http://mediwire.skyscape.com/mai ... mp;ArticleID=187972 As mentioned earlier, processes are "validated" and instruments are "qualified." Analytical instrument qualification (AIQ) provides documented evidence that the instrument performs suitably for its intended purpose and that it is properly maintained and calibrated. Qualification normally is grouped into four distinct phases, design qualification (DQ), installation qualification (IQ), operational qualification (OQ), and performance qualification (PQ). A definition and discussion of each of the qualification phases have been covered in previous "Validation Viewpoint" columns and elsewhere and really do not need to be repeated here (2,14). The AAPS publication also does an excellent job of capturing the definition and documentation of each of these phases as well, as an excellent discussion on software validation to which the reader is referred for more information (3). However, there are a couple of other significant areas that the AAPS group focused on that are worth noting; documentation and the categorization of instruments according to the level of qualification required. Both static and dynamic documentation can result from an AIQ. Static documents are generated during the DQ, IQ, and OQ phases and should be kept in a separate qualification binder. Static documents can include such things as user manuals, site requirement documents, etc. Dynamic documents are generated during the OQ and PQ phases, when actual instrument testing takes place. These documents provide a running record for the instrument use and maintenance and should be kept in a system log book with the instrument, available for viewing as necessary by anyone interested (that is, the FDA). These documents also should be appropriately archived for future reference and protection. Instruments were placed into three categories (A, B, and C), again based upon their complexity and proposed level of qualification. The conformance of Group A instruments to user requirements is determined by visual observation; no independent qualification process is required. Examples of Group A instruments include spatulas, ovens, magnetic stirrers, microscopes, and vortex mixers. The conformance of Group B instruments to user requirements is determined according to the instruments' SOP, and their failure usually is readily discernable. Examples of instruments that fall into this category are pH meters, balances, thermometers, refrigerator–freezers, and vacuum ovens. Group C instruments are defined as highly method-specific, complex instruments with conformance determined by their application. Full qualification as outlined in the AAPS report is applied to instruments in this group. Examples include high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and gas chromatography (GC) instruments, spectrometers, mass spectrometers, and electron microscopes. [ Last edited by penn007 on 2007-11-12 at 14:23 ] |
5樓2007-11-12 13:56:28
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 294分080500材料科學(xué)與工程求調(diào)劑 +8 | 柳溪邊 2026-03-26 | 8/400 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 334分 一志愿武理 材料求調(diào)劑 +7 | 李李不服輸 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿雙一流機(jī)械285分求調(diào)劑 +4 | 幸運(yùn)的三木 2026-03-29 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料學(xué)碩333求調(diào)劑 +11 | 北道巷 2026-03-24 | 11/550 |
|
|
|
[考研] 321求調(diào)劑 +7 | 璞玉~~ 2026-03-25 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿211 初試270分 求調(diào)劑 +8 | 谷雨上岸 2026-03-23 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 083000學(xué)碩274求調(diào)劑 +8 | Li李魚 2026-03-26 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑 +7 | 嗯滴的基本都 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿上海理工能源動(dòng)力（085800）310分求調(diào)劑 +3 | zhangmingc 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +4 | Sanmu-124 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 266分求材料化工冶金礦業(yè)等專業(yè)的調(diào)劑 +4 | 哇呼哼呼哼 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085600，材料與化工321分，求調(diào)劑 +9 | 大饞小子 2026-03-27 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 316求調(diào)劑 +5 | Pigcasso 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 314求調(diào)劑 +3 | 溪云珂 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 292求調(diào)劑 +4 | 求求了收下我吧?/a> 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 342求調(diào)劑 +3 | 加油a李zs 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 總分322求生物學(xué)/生化與分子/生物信息學(xué)相關(guān)調(diào)劑 +5 | 星沉uu 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 生物學(xué) 296 求調(diào)劑 +4 | 朵朵- 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 環(huán)境專碩324分求調(diào)劑推薦 +5 | 軒小寧—— 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 344求調(diào)劑 +3 | desto 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|