| 查看: 10770 | 回復(fù): 26 | ||||
xiaoxiao270至尊木蟲 (著名寫手)
|
[求助]
審稿人一個(gè)拒稿一個(gè)大修,編輯給大修,求助
|
|||
|
如題,兩個(gè)審稿人,一個(gè)及其尖刻,沒有一句正面評價(jià),強(qiáng)烈要求拒稿,如下: Reviewer #1:I regret not being able to recommend publication of this MS in ????, since the structure elucidation of the alleged natural products is not convinging. Also, the biological data are commented in a confused way, and there is not a good correspondence from what claimed in the text and what is reported in the Tables. Either there are blunders, or the authors pay little attention to the preparation of the MS. Therefore, I believe it should be rejected. 另一個(gè)好點(diǎn),說給大修: Comments: The manuscript reported some new dihydrobenzofuran neolignans, and their cytotoxicity and antioxidant activities were evaluated. Overall, the authors made an interesting and valuable discovery. However, in this manuscript, there are a few problems needed to be addressed: 1. For the compounds 1, 2, and 8, their left benzene rings should be 1, 3, 4-trisubstituted rather than 1, 3, 5-trisubstitute on the basis of the 1HNMR and 13CNMR data. Detailed illustrations see the related reference (Chem Pharm Bull 1996, 44: 1122-3; Phytochemistry 1998, 48(4):719-23; etc.). As a matter of fact, commonly the 13CNMR data of 3, 5-oxygen substitute should be at approximate ?c 157 ppm rather than ?c 147 ppm in this manuscript. Therefore, please revise these structures, and search their novelty again. 2. In the Abstract, "compound 10 revealed .. stronger inhibitory activity.", but in table 4, only the cytotoxic activity of compound 9 was displayed. So, please check it. In addition, since all the compounds were assayed on cytotoxicity test, the data should be given in the table. 3. In "2.3. Extraction and isolation" section, line 13, where is F2-2-2 from? It is not mentioned in this part. Further, in this section, all the sentences "1H and 13C NMR see Tables.." were not matched with the real tables. 4. Page 17, "Table 3" should be "Table 4" 5. Reference 7, "food chemistry" should be "food chem" 編輯還給了最后的機(jī)會: Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript, and there are discrepancies with the text, the tables and the formulas that make it difficult to judge the value of your MS. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to receive your revised manuscript and send it again out for reviewing. 現(xiàn)在問題是,兩個(gè)審稿人提出的最大的結(jié)構(gòu)上問題,我們認(rèn)為還是提錯了(見加粗),并且有少量文獻(xiàn)和自己的實(shí)驗(yàn)數(shù)據(jù)作為證據(jù)。但是這樣明確的駁倒審稿人,會不會導(dǎo)致第一個(gè)審稿人的憤怒?文章是否還是主要看第一個(gè)審稿人的態(tài)度??我們該怎么回復(fù)?謝謝。! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() [ Last edited by xiaoxiao270 on 2013-8-28 at 10:32 ] |
國基、SCI投稿精華集 | 論文編輯與投稿 |

至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
鐵桿木蟲 (著名寫手)
| 第一現(xiàn)在審稿人意見的基礎(chǔ)上修改,對于審稿意見你覺得不對的地方(也許并不是這樣),你可以引經(jīng)據(jù)典,應(yīng)用你的所謂的少量文章和實(shí)驗(yàn)數(shù)據(jù),來證明你們的觀點(diǎn)是可能正確的,而審稿人的認(rèn)為可能是錯誤的。語氣要客觀和客氣。國外的審稿人對于你可以列出事實(shí)來反駁他的觀點(diǎn)的,不是太在意的,反而樂于接受。但是,你不能上來就說,你錯了,你怎么怎么不對,語氣委婉些。此外,文章主要看編輯的態(tài)度,這樣的審稿意見編輯都給你大修,說明他還是比較喜歡你做的東西,所以要珍惜這個(gè)機(jī)會。根據(jù)主編的語氣,貌似還要外審,而且不一定送給原來的審稿人,所以,一切都還很遠(yuǎn),你現(xiàn)在要做的就是好好修改 |
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)

至尊木蟲 (知名作家)

木蟲 (著名寫手)


木蟲 (著名寫手)

金蟲 (正式寫手)
木蟲 (正式寫手)
| 認(rèn)真修改,看情況吧,這樣的接受的機(jī)會還是很大的,畢竟編輯給了你機(jī)會,機(jī)會實(shí)在難得的。我的文章也是這樣的,大修。一個(gè)人說要再審。另外兩個(gè)是小修。結(jié)果編輯給出了大修。然后修改完之后,就直接接受了。還是很快的。你好好修改,逐條答復(fù)意見。寫的清楚,人家會考慮的。這個(gè)就不由得自己決定了?醋约旱呐Τ潭攘,還有修改的時(shí)候最好找?guī)讉(gè)懂得你的東西的,好好的給你把把關(guān),若是有老板把關(guān)最好了,自己弄完一定得和專家商量,看怎么弄合適!切記關(guān)門造車,還有最好找一下你們師兄師姐投完稿件的回復(fù)意見,看看怎么寫合適。 |

木蟲 (正式寫手)
鐵蟲 (正式寫手)

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 293求調(diào)劑 +11 | zjl的號 2026-03-16 | 16/800 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑,英語六級551,有科研經(jīng)歷 +3 | 生物工程調(diào)劑 2026-03-16 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +4 | 是Lupa啊 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工求調(diào)劑 +5 | 緒幸與子 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 283求調(diào)劑 +3 | 聽風(fēng)就是雨; 2026-03-16 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0854控制工程 359求調(diào)劑 可跨專業(yè) +3 | 626776879 2026-03-14 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿211 0703方向310分求調(diào)劑 +3 | 努力奮斗112 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +5 | 26研0 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 0703一志愿211 285分求調(diào)劑 +5 | ly3471z 2026-03-13 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 0856專碩279求調(diào)劑 +5 | 加油加油!? 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 294求調(diào)劑 +3 | Zys010410@ 2026-03-13 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 288求調(diào)劑 +4 | 奇點(diǎn)0314 2026-03-14 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 265求調(diào)劑 +4 | 威化餅07 2026-03-12 | 4/200 |
|
|
[基金申請] 現(xiàn)在如何回避去年的某一個(gè)專家,不知道名字 +3 | zk200107 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程調(diào)劑 +9 | 咪咪空空 2026-03-12 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 求材料調(diào)劑 +5 | 隔壁陳先生 2026-03-12 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +7 | 7712b 2026-03-13 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 315求調(diào)劑 +9 | 小羊小羊_ 2026-03-11 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +7 | 18880831720 2026-03-11 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 307求調(diào)劑 +5 | 超級伊昂大王 2026-03-12 | 5/250 |
|