 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 查看: 5249 | 回復(fù): 24 | ||
心會(huì)笑嗎銅蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
這個(gè)審稿結(jié)果修改后錄用的概率有多大？ 已有11人參與
|
|
|
Dear XXX: Your manuscript entitled "XXX" which you submitted to Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B - Plant Soil Science, has been reviewed. Enclosed please find the reviews of the above manuscript. On the basis of the reviewers' appraisals and my own, your manuscript is conditionally accepted pending revision. Please carefully review all criticisms and suggestions raised by the referees. Please keep in mind that this decision does not guarantee a final acceptance of the work. In your cover letter please provide a point-by-point response to each comment. When I have received your revised manuscript, I will notify you of the status of your manuscript. When you revise your manuscript please highlight the changes you make in the manuscript by using the track changes mode in MS Word or by using bold or coloured text. Once again, thank you for submitting your manuscript to Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B - Plant Soil Science and I look forward to receiving your revision. Sincerely, XXX Referee(s)' Comments to Author: Referee: 1 Comments to the Author 1. Novelty of the paper. I do not see some novelty in the paper. The aim of the paper was to compare infiltration /outflow rates during heavy rainfall under conditions of different treatments, slopes and with and without soil crust. 2. Results obtained by measurements (experiments) in laboratory are correct, they correspond to the known qualitative results of measurements published in literature. 3. Novelty are probably the data for Chinese loess plateau; but they are probably interesting to this region. I am not sure if this type of information (case study) can be published in this Journal. 4. I can repeat, that this study is good made. Formally, it needs a lot of improvements. Language is not good enough, there are presented some trivial information, like definition of infiltration, some terms are not used properly. Substantial language improvement is needed to sanction publication-important 5. Regarding to the influence of slope on the infiltration rate, it can be noted, that it depends on rain rate. At low rate of precipitation, the influence of slope can be negligible, but at high rates it can be significant. The rate of rain used here was extremely high, therefore the slope matters. As many studies already are available on the topic you must highlight the new information-important Referee: 2 Comments to the Author General comments Generally, the innovation degree of the manuscript is medium, since there have been some researches on infiltration under tillage treatments in Loess Plateau of China. And it is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar and sentence structure. 1) I think Fig. 3 is not necessary, since Fig. 2 clearly shows the infiltration rate curve including the steady-state infiltration rate for different tillage treatments under different slope angles, and Table I is not necessary, since Table Ⅱ shows the ponding time from different tillage treatments between the crusted and uncrusted soil surface including all the data in Table I. 2) In Table IV, the positions of Rtc and Rtuc may be opposite. The meanings of IRc-CK and IRuc-CK are not clear, and I think IRc-SS and IRuc-SS are easier to understand. 3) Enlarge description in “treatments” to explain the different treatments more clearly. As far as I understand there’re 24 treatments (2 soil surface conditions by 3 tillage treatments by 4 slope angles), aren’t there? 4) There is a lack of explanation of statistical methods used in the study. You need to provide more descriptions on the paired T-test and the Multivariate analysis. 5) The results should be compared with previous researches, since there have been some relative researches in Loess Plateau of China. 6) The conclusion section was omitted. You need to provide major conclusions from this study in a lonely section. 7) You provided an exhaustive list of references in various place. I recommend you only cite the ones that are most relevant and representative. In addition, the reference formats are not uniform, so you should revise them carefully according to the editor demands. 8) The 9th line: “The results showed that” instead of “Results show that:”? 9) The 28th line: “influencing” rather than “influence”. 10) The 45th line: “Tillage treatments sometimes were discussed as no tillage, mulch farming, stable mulch, minimum tillage and so on in the USA and Australia.” References are needed for the 2 countries listed in this sentence. 11) The 161st line: “Fig. 3” should be revised into “Fig. 4”. Fig. 4 is an example of 5° slope, but its representativeness is not clear and it can’t stand for the other slopes, so the relative conclusion appears unbelievable. 12) The 164th line: “Fig. 4” should be revised into “Fig. 5”. 13) The 166th line: the expression “1.29-1.56 times under CT treatment” and following similar ones are not accurate from mathematical angle. Referee: 3 Comments to the Author 1. The manuscript dealt with the infiltration under tillage treatments and soil crusts in the Loess Plateau of China. One problem is that the authors used the changed soil in their experiment, compared to the undisturbed soil. Sieve could change soil particle composition and grain size distribution; while compressing could destroy the original soil porosity and soil pore structure. All of these will lead to the alterations of soil texture and bulk density, which are closely related to soil permeability. Besides, the soil used in the experiment has been processed into a uniform bulk density, which is impossible in the field environment. 2. Line 24-25: From the references you provided, you cannot draw the conclusion that “soil moisture is the greatest fact or affecting vegetation restoration and ecological environment”. I think the greatest factor is water resources instead of soil moisture. 3. Line 26-27: Please give detailed explanation about the sentence to make it convinced or more accessible. How could infiltration process increase crop yield? 4. Line 32: Is the term “a soil crust” or “soil crust”? Please clarify. 5. Line 34-36: What kind of impact does crust have on the erosion process, positive or negative? It’s better to make it clear. 6. Line 37-39: Rewrite the sentence please. The sentence “Effects of soil crusts on the soil erosion process have been studied for many years” has nothing to do with the hydraulic conductivity. 7. Line 45-46: What do you want to express through the sentence? 8. Line 60-61: After reading through the full manuscript, it’s hard to find the relationship between infiltration and soil and water loss, let alone the prevention of soil and water loss. 9. Line 62-67: “Interaction” is quite different from “combined action”. What have you done in your experiment is the combined action instead of the interaction. 10 Section of Soil Materials (Line 73-82): What have you done on the soil before the experiment could change the soil texture. Why did you select the uniform bulk density? 11. Section of Rainfall simulator(Line 83-91): The authors could use a picture to summarize these sentences. 12. Line 125: “to runoff”? 13. Line 125-130: The section of results and discussion is too simple. What about the situation under the crusted surface? 14. Line 152-153: How to draw this conclusion? Where is the table or fig.? 15. Line 206: The conclusion should come from the comparison of the crusted without tillage treatments and the crusted with tillage treatments. |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
326求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
-
333求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
一志愿東華大學(xué)控制學(xué)碩320求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
考研化學(xué)學(xué)碩調(diào)劑，一志愿985
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
化學(xué)工程321分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有21人回復(fù)
-
0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有15人回復(fù)
-
0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 ，六級已過，有科研經(jīng)歷
已經(jīng)有14人回復(fù)
-
326求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
311求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有13人回復(fù)
-
311求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)價(jià)值貼推薦，對您同樣有幫助:
- 編輯給的回復(fù)是這樣的，這樣最后接受的幾率大嗎？
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- 請問論文外審?fù)ㄟ^之后錄用概率大嗎？
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
- 收到初審意見了，大家說錄用的可能性有多大？
已經(jīng)有13人回復(fù)
- 審稿時(shí)間與接收概率
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
- 通信學(xué)報(bào)審稿費(fèi)是等通知再交嗎？一般審稿時(shí)間是多久啊？錄用幾率有多大？
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
- 修改后再審是什么狀態(tài)？？？求助~~~~~
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
- 審稿意見修改影不影響錄用？
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
- 修改后錄用機(jī)會(huì)大嗎
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
- 物理學(xué)報(bào)主編終審階段被退稿的概率有多大
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
- 專家意見是建議錄用，稿件狀態(tài)是修改后終審，這樣的情況錄用的機(jī)會(huì)大嗎？
已經(jīng)有36人回復(fù)
- 審稿人給提了修改很多的修改意見，是不是被拒概率很高？
已經(jīng)有30人回復(fù)
- 這么個(gè)審稿意見，錄用幾率大嗎？
已經(jīng)有20人回復(fù)
- 外審后退修,錄用的可能性有多大?
已經(jīng)有13人回復(fù)
- 《材料科學(xué)與工藝》修改后再審被錄用的概率有多大？
已經(jīng)有19人回復(fù)
- 論文處于編輯加工狀態(tài)，錄用率有多大？
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
- Re-submit 的文章幾率有多大？
已經(jīng)有32人回復(fù)
- 審稿意見“修改后錄用”，改得不好的話會(huì)不會(huì)被斃掉
已經(jīng)有48人回復(fù)
- 機(jī)械工程學(xué)報(bào)初審?fù)ㄟ^，無修改意見，已送復(fù)審，請問錄用幾率多大？
已經(jīng)有30人回復(fù)
- 《電子學(xué)報(bào)》的編委審批狀態(tài)錄用的幾率是多大？
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
- 一審的評審結(jié)果，接收的可能性多大？
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
- 論文修改后由誰決定錄用與否
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
- 大家?guī)臀曳治鲆幌耺aterial and design的審稿意見，錄用幾率大不？
已經(jīng)有24人回復(fù)
- 請問一下，是不是審稿時(shí)間越長，被錄用的可能性越大呢？
已經(jīng)有58人回復(fù)
- 投稿AEM，這種審稿結(jié)果，稿件錄用的機(jī)會(huì)有多大？
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
- 請教《物理學(xué)報(bào)》修改后再審的錄用幾率？
已經(jīng)有16人回復(fù)
- 請教《計(jì)算機(jī)應(yīng)用》到了審理三錄用概率有多大
已經(jīng)有24人回復(fù)
yinss
木蟲 (正式寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 4 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 2316.8
- 散金: 5
- 紅花: 6
- 帖子: 964
- 在線: 84.5小時(shí)
- 蟲號: 1142501
- 注冊: 2010-11-09
- 專業(yè): 放射醫(yī)學(xué)
9樓2014-02-28 10:25:44
8樓2014-02-28 10:19:21
oceanlike
木蟲 (著名寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 214 (大學(xué)生)
- 金幣: 5043.2
- 散金: 419
- 紅花: 15
- 帖子: 2578
- 在線: 435.1小時(shí)
- 蟲號: 619577
- 注冊: 2008-10-07
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 礦山巖體力學(xué)與巖層控制
4樓2014-02-28 06:38:16
dahuaidang
鐵桿木蟲 (著名寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 97 (初中生)
- 金幣: 5610.2
- 散金: 1132
- 紅花: 13
- 帖子: 2720
- 在線: 184.5小時(shí)
- 蟲號: 1538736
- 注冊: 2011-12-15
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 微生物遺傳育種學(xué)
5樓2014-02-28 08:54:52
皆悟蘭因
新蟲 (小有名氣)
- 應(yīng)助: 1 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 87
- 帖子: 65
- 在線: 48.2小時(shí)
- 蟲號: 1773313
- 注冊: 2012-04-23
- 專業(yè): 藥劑學(xué)
6樓2014-02-28 09:09:48
statsky
木蟲 (正式寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 35 (小學(xué)生)
- 金幣: 4634.7
- 散金: 2415
- 紅花: 2
- 帖子: 782
- 在線: 627.8小時(shí)
- 蟲號: 417924
- 注冊: 2007-07-02
- 專業(yè): 數(shù)學(xué)
2樓2014-02-28 01:04:13
3樓2014-02-28 05:53:32
yijianmeixyt
鐵桿木蟲 (著名寫手)
一剪梅
- 應(yīng)助: 158 (高中生)
- 金幣: 16506.5
- 散金: 59
- 紅花: 5
- 帖子: 1880
- 在線: 304.6小時(shí)
- 蟲號: 1161506
- 注冊: 2010-12-03
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 機(jī)構(gòu)學(xué)與機(jī)器人
7樓2014-02-28 09:18:11
10樓2014-02-28 10:29:40
相關(guān)版塊跳轉(zhuǎn)
我要訂閱樓主 心會(huì)笑嗎 的主題更新
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0805 316求調(diào)劑 +3 | 大雪深藏 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
[考研] 【考研調(diào)劑】化學(xué)專業(yè) 281分，一志愿四川大學(xué)，誠心求調(diào)劑 +11 | 吃吃吃才有意義 2026-03-19 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 材料學(xué)碩301分求調(diào)劑 +6 | Liyouyumairs 2026-03-21 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[基金申請]
學(xué)校已經(jīng)提交到NSFC，還能修改嗎？
 40+4
|
babangida 2026-03-19 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +6 | Mqqqqqq 2026-03-19 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 265求調(diào)劑 +3 | Jack?k?y 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 332求調(diào)劑 +4 | ydfyh 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 324分 085600材料化工求調(diào)劑 +4 | llllkkkhh 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿西南交大，求調(diào)劑 +5 | 材化逐夢人 2026-03-18 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 22408 344分 求調(diào)劑 一志愿 華電計(jì)算機(jī)技術(shù) +4 | solanXXX 2026-03-20 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工 +8 | 安全上岸！ 2026-03-16 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 329求調(diào)劑 +9 | 想上學(xué)吖吖 2026-03-19 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿 南京航空航天大學(xué)大學(xué) ，080500材料科學(xué)與工程學(xué)碩 +5 | @taotao 2026-03-20 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +3 | eation27 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考博] 招收博士1-2人 +3 | QGZDSYS 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考博] 申博26年 +3 | 八6八68 2026-03-19 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研]
 0854，計(jì)算機(jī)類招收調(diào)劑
+3
|
胡辣湯放糖 2026-03-15 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 293求調(diào)劑 +11 | zjl的號 2026-03-16 | 16/800 |
|
|
|
[考研] 283求調(diào)劑 +3 | 聽風(fēng)就是雨； 2026-03-16 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 070300化學(xué)學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑 +6 | 太想進(jìn)步了0608 2026-03-16 | 6/300 |
|