| 查看: 4048 | 回復(fù): 13 | |||
foolishstar木蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
收到初審意見了,大家說錄用的可能性有多大? 已有5人參與
|
||
|
元旦收到文章的初審意見,有三個評審,有兩個人很明確,支持發(fā)表,有一個也很明確,反對。原話如下: 1 Reviewer #1: The******** is a quite interesting topic, worth to be addressed in a systematic way. The paper is well written, the experimental procedure is described (with some missing details as outlined below) and the experimental uncertainties are reported. As far as the discussion and conclusions are concerned, in my opinion some points have to be clarified as suggested below. In summary, I consider the paper worth to be published in Applied Thermal Engineering, provided the following amendments are carried out: (下面是具體修改意見) 2 Reviewer #2: This paper reports ***********. The topic is very interesting. It is recommended that the manuscript be accepted, subject to however a major revision. (下面是具體修改意見) 3 Reviewer #3: The paper is focused on*******. For this purpose the Authors consider that the proposed new index *****. However, there are two weaknesses: 1. The innovative part is not clear; what new the article has to add in the ATE? 2. The Author's proposed system is very similar to an existing techno-commercial system. In particular the Authors do not explain the originality of their approach and of their results with respect to the literature data. In conclusion the paper is of low scientific quality and neither well presented and organized. Therefore the present manuscript is not suitable for publication in ATE. (下面沒有了) 我感覺第三個人沒好好看,因為他說的我的論文的弱點不是我的主要的東西。但是我應(yīng)該怎么跟他講呢? 另外,大家說如果按照要求修改了,發(fā)表的幾率多大? 謝謝 |
|
審稿人意見不起決定性作用,主要就是看編輯,他讓你修,機(jī)會就很大 修改的時候主要注意第三個人的觀點 突出你文章創(chuàng)新性在哪,和別人的區(qū)別,既然前兩個人都說interesting了,應(yīng)該創(chuàng)新性很明顯才對,可能是你寫的不夠突出 第二個他認(rèn)為你的和已有的區(qū)別不大,那么你就應(yīng)該說清楚差別在哪。 最后他提到你文章缺乏和前人結(jié)果的對比,說明你在discussion部分沒有怎么注意引用前人發(fā)表的成果,也就是缺乏分析,要注意改下就得了 我覺得只要認(rèn)真改,基本上穩(wěn)中了 |
超級版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗: +21105 |

超級版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗: +21105 |
至尊木蟲 (著名寫手)
|
希望很大,前面兩個都interesting,這個評價比較高了 第二個其實是大修, 第三個稱論文表達(dá)方面不清楚,這些都可以改進(jìn),尤其是你要講清楚你的方法的優(yōu)點,及跟現(xiàn)有方法的比較 我覺得如果能認(rèn)真回應(yīng)的話,中的希望很大 |
至尊木蟲 (知名作家)

木蟲 (小有名氣)
|
不用擔(dān)心那么多,你回答的好,審稿人也是通情達(dá)理的 關(guān)鍵還是論文的質(zhì)量,把你的特色突出出來,他說和別人的一樣,你就要說出來不一樣的地方,有理有據(jù) 但是要顧及他的面子,別說的太僵,先肯定他說的有道理,然后說自己的理由,或者說自己贊同他的觀點,文章中也有體現(xiàn),只是可能由于自己的原因沒有說清楚之類的 |
木蟲 (小有名氣)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研]
|
y7czhao 2026-03-26 | 10/500 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +4 | 冬十三 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 289求調(diào)劑 +10 | 新時代材料 2026-03-27 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 085404求調(diào)劑,總分309,本科經(jīng)歷較為豐富 +4 | 來財aa 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料求調(diào)劑 一志愿哈工大總分298分,前三科223分 +5 | dongfang59 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 0856材料化工調(diào)劑 總分330 +10 | zhubinhao 2026-03-27 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工085600,總分304,本科有兩篇sci參與,求調(diào)劑 +10 | 幸運(yùn)的醬醬 2026-03-22 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考博] 26申博 +3 | 加油沖! 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 324求調(diào)劑 +5 | hanamiko 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 359求調(diào)劑 +4 | 王了個楠 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 321求調(diào)劑 +6 | wasdssaa 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研]
材料調(diào)劑
5+4
|
想要一壺桃花水 2026-03-25 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 機(jī)械學(xué)碩310分,數(shù)一英一,一志愿211本科雙非找調(diào)劑信息 +3 | @357 2026-03-25 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 086000生物與醫(yī)藥292求調(diào)劑 +6 | 小小陳小小 2026-03-22 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 303求調(diào)劑 +6 | 藍(lán)山月 2026-03-25 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 318求調(diào)劑 +5 | plum李子 2026-03-21 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿北化315 求調(diào)劑 +3 | akrrain 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 344求調(diào)劑 +3 | desto 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 求老師收我 +3 | zzh16938784 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿北京化工大學(xué)070300 學(xué)碩336求調(diào)劑 +5 | vv迷 2026-03-21 | 8/400 |
|