| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 4050 | 回復(fù): 13 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
foolishstar木蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
收到初審意見了,大家說錄用的可能性有多大? 已有5人參與
|
||
|
元旦收到文章的初審意見,有三個(gè)評(píng)審,有兩個(gè)人很明確,支持發(fā)表,有一個(gè)也很明確,反對(duì)。原話如下: 1 Reviewer #1: The******** is a quite interesting topic, worth to be addressed in a systematic way. The paper is well written, the experimental procedure is described (with some missing details as outlined below) and the experimental uncertainties are reported. As far as the discussion and conclusions are concerned, in my opinion some points have to be clarified as suggested below. In summary, I consider the paper worth to be published in Applied Thermal Engineering, provided the following amendments are carried out: (下面是具體修改意見) 2 Reviewer #2: This paper reports ***********. The topic is very interesting. It is recommended that the manuscript be accepted, subject to however a major revision. (下面是具體修改意見) 3 Reviewer #3: The paper is focused on*******. For this purpose the Authors consider that the proposed new index *****. However, there are two weaknesses: 1. The innovative part is not clear; what new the article has to add in the ATE? 2. The Author's proposed system is very similar to an existing techno-commercial system. In particular the Authors do not explain the originality of their approach and of their results with respect to the literature data. In conclusion the paper is of low scientific quality and neither well presented and organized. Therefore the present manuscript is not suitable for publication in ATE. (下面沒有了) 我感覺第三個(gè)人沒好好看,因?yàn)樗f的我的論文的弱點(diǎn)不是我的主要的東西。但是我應(yīng)該怎么跟他講呢? 另外,大家說如果按照要求修改了,發(fā)表的幾率多大? 謝謝 |
至尊木蟲 (著名寫手)
|
希望很大,前面兩個(gè)都interesting,這個(gè)評(píng)價(jià)比較高了 第二個(gè)其實(shí)是大修, 第三個(gè)稱論文表達(dá)方面不清楚,這些都可以改進(jìn),尤其是你要講清楚你的方法的優(yōu)點(diǎn),及跟現(xiàn)有方法的比較 我覺得如果能認(rèn)真回應(yīng)的話,中的希望很大 |

超級(jí)版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +21105 |
|
審稿人意見不起決定性作用,主要就是看編輯,他讓你修,機(jī)會(huì)就很大 修改的時(shí)候主要注意第三個(gè)人的觀點(diǎn) 突出你文章創(chuàng)新性在哪,和別人的區(qū)別,既然前兩個(gè)人都說interesting了,應(yīng)該創(chuàng)新性很明顯才對(duì),可能是你寫的不夠突出 第二個(gè)他認(rèn)為你的和已有的區(qū)別不大,那么你就應(yīng)該說清楚差別在哪。 最后他提到你文章缺乏和前人結(jié)果的對(duì)比,說明你在discussion部分沒有怎么注意引用前人發(fā)表的成果,也就是缺乏分析,要注意改下就得了 我覺得只要認(rèn)真改,基本上穩(wěn)中了 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿北化085600材料專碩275|有文章專利|求調(diào)劑 +7 | Micky11223 2026-03-25 | 7/350 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿華理,數(shù)一英一285求A區(qū)調(diào)劑 +8 | AZMK 2026-03-25 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +6 | 曼殊2266 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 求化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +4 | wulanna 2026-03-28 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 321求調(diào)劑 +6 | 材料cailiao 2026-03-21 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研]
|
18419759900 2026-03-25 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 283求調(diào)劑(080500) +4 | A child 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 08開頭275求調(diào)劑 +4 | 拉誰不重要 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 316求調(diào)劑 +5 | Pigcasso 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 315調(diào)劑 +4 | 0860求調(diào)劑 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +9 | 小蠟新筆 2026-03-26 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑323材料與化工 +7 | 1124361 2026-03-24 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 359求調(diào)劑 +4 | 王了個(gè)楠 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 總分322求生物學(xué)/生化與分子/生物信息學(xué)相關(guān)調(diào)劑 +5 | 星沉uu 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中南大學(xué)化學(xué)學(xué)碩0703總分337求調(diào)劑 +7 | niko- 2026-03-22 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 各位老師您好:本人初試372分 +5 | jj涌77 2026-03-25 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 361求調(diào)劑 +3 | Glack 2026-03-22 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 269求調(diào)劑 +4 | 我想讀研11 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 333求調(diào)劑 +3 | ALULU4408 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 315分,誠求調(diào)劑,材料與化工085600 +3 | 13756423260 2026-03-22 | 3/150 |
|