| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 4049 | 回復(fù): 13 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
foolishstar木蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
收到初審意見了,大家說錄用的可能性有多大? 已有5人參與
|
||
|
元旦收到文章的初審意見,有三個評審,有兩個人很明確,支持發(fā)表,有一個也很明確,反對。原話如下: 1 Reviewer #1: The******** is a quite interesting topic, worth to be addressed in a systematic way. The paper is well written, the experimental procedure is described (with some missing details as outlined below) and the experimental uncertainties are reported. As far as the discussion and conclusions are concerned, in my opinion some points have to be clarified as suggested below. In summary, I consider the paper worth to be published in Applied Thermal Engineering, provided the following amendments are carried out: (下面是具體修改意見) 2 Reviewer #2: This paper reports ***********. The topic is very interesting. It is recommended that the manuscript be accepted, subject to however a major revision. (下面是具體修改意見) 3 Reviewer #3: The paper is focused on*******. For this purpose the Authors consider that the proposed new index *****. However, there are two weaknesses: 1. The innovative part is not clear; what new the article has to add in the ATE? 2. The Author's proposed system is very similar to an existing techno-commercial system. In particular the Authors do not explain the originality of their approach and of their results with respect to the literature data. In conclusion the paper is of low scientific quality and neither well presented and organized. Therefore the present manuscript is not suitable for publication in ATE. (下面沒有了) 我感覺第三個人沒好好看,因為他說的我的論文的弱點不是我的主要的東西。但是我應(yīng)該怎么跟他講呢? 另外,大家說如果按照要求修改了,發(fā)表的幾率多大? 謝謝 |
超級版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗: +21105 |

至尊木蟲 (著名寫手)
|
希望很大,前面兩個都interesting,這個評價比較高了 第二個其實是大修, 第三個稱論文表達(dá)方面不清楚,這些都可以改進(jìn),尤其是你要講清楚你的方法的優(yōu)點,及跟現(xiàn)有方法的比較 我覺得如果能認(rèn)真回應(yīng)的話,中的希望很大 |
|
審稿人意見不起決定性作用,主要就是看編輯,他讓你修,機會就很大 修改的時候主要注意第三個人的觀點 突出你文章創(chuàng)新性在哪,和別人的區(qū)別,既然前兩個人都說interesting了,應(yīng)該創(chuàng)新性很明顯才對,可能是你寫的不夠突出 第二個他認(rèn)為你的和已有的區(qū)別不大,那么你就應(yīng)該說清楚差別在哪。 最后他提到你文章缺乏和前人結(jié)果的對比,說明你在discussion部分沒有怎么注意引用前人發(fā)表的成果,也就是缺乏分析,要注意改下就得了 我覺得只要認(rèn)真改,基本上穩(wěn)中了 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 305求調(diào)劑 +6 | RuiFairyrui 2026-03-28 | 6/300 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0703 化學(xué) 求調(diào)劑,一志愿山東大學(xué) 342 分 +3 | Shern—- 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 275求調(diào)劑 +10 | Micky11223 2026-03-25 | 14/700 |
|
|
[考研] 312,生物學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +3 | 小譯同學(xué)abc 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +9 | 奶油草莓. 2026-03-22 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 266分,求材料冶金能源化工等調(diào)劑 +7 | 哇呼哼呼哼 2026-03-27 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 數(shù)一英一271專碩(085401)求調(diào)劑,可跨 +4 | 前行必有光 2026-03-28 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 295求調(diào)劑 +5 | 1428151015 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)求調(diào)劑,各位老師看看我。! +5 | 祁祺祺 2026-03-25 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 086000調(diào)劑 +3 | 7901117076 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿北京化工大學(xué) 070300 學(xué)碩 336分 求調(diào)劑 +9 | vv迷 2026-03-22 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考博] 26申博 +3 | 加油沖啊! 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 287求調(diào)劑 +10 | land xuxu 2026-03-26 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 274求調(diào)劑 +17 | 顧九笙要謙虛 2026-03-24 | 23/1150 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +8 | Auroracx 2026-03-22 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研]
|
WWW西西弗斯 2026-03-24 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 297求調(diào)劑 +6 | 田洪有 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 考研一志愿蘇州大學(xué)初始315(英一)求調(diào)劑 +3 | sbdksD 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 284求調(diào)劑 +15 | Zhao anqi 2026-03-22 | 15/750 |
|
|
[考研] 求老師收我 +3 | zzh16938784 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|