| 查看: 4053 | 回復(fù): 13 | |||
foolishstar木蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
收到初審意見(jiàn)了,大家說(shuō)錄用的可能性有多大? 已有5人參與
|
||
|
元旦收到文章的初審意見(jiàn),有三個(gè)評(píng)審,有兩個(gè)人很明確,支持發(fā)表,有一個(gè)也很明確,反對(duì)。原話如下: 1 Reviewer #1: The******** is a quite interesting topic, worth to be addressed in a systematic way. The paper is well written, the experimental procedure is described (with some missing details as outlined below) and the experimental uncertainties are reported. As far as the discussion and conclusions are concerned, in my opinion some points have to be clarified as suggested below. In summary, I consider the paper worth to be published in Applied Thermal Engineering, provided the following amendments are carried out: (下面是具體修改意見(jiàn)) 2 Reviewer #2: This paper reports ***********. The topic is very interesting. It is recommended that the manuscript be accepted, subject to however a major revision. (下面是具體修改意見(jiàn)) 3 Reviewer #3: The paper is focused on*******. For this purpose the Authors consider that the proposed new index *****. However, there are two weaknesses: 1. The innovative part is not clear; what new the article has to add in the ATE? 2. The Author's proposed system is very similar to an existing techno-commercial system. In particular the Authors do not explain the originality of their approach and of their results with respect to the literature data. In conclusion the paper is of low scientific quality and neither well presented and organized. Therefore the present manuscript is not suitable for publication in ATE. (下面沒(méi)有了) 我感覺(jué)第三個(gè)人沒(méi)好好看,因?yàn)樗f(shuō)的我的論文的弱點(diǎn)不是我的主要的東西。但是我應(yīng)該怎么跟他講呢? 另外,大家說(shuō)如果按照要求修改了,發(fā)表的幾率多大? 謝謝 |
|
審稿人意見(jiàn)不起決定性作用,主要就是看編輯,他讓你修,機(jī)會(huì)就很大 修改的時(shí)候主要注意第三個(gè)人的觀點(diǎn) 突出你文章創(chuàng)新性在哪,和別人的區(qū)別,既然前兩個(gè)人都說(shuō)interesting了,應(yīng)該創(chuàng)新性很明顯才對(duì),可能是你寫的不夠突出 第二個(gè)他認(rèn)為你的和已有的區(qū)別不大,那么你就應(yīng)該說(shuō)清楚差別在哪。 最后他提到你文章缺乏和前人結(jié)果的對(duì)比,說(shuō)明你在discussion部分沒(méi)有怎么注意引用前人發(fā)表的成果,也就是缺乏分析,要注意改下就得了 我覺(jué)得只要認(rèn)真改,基本上穩(wěn)中了 |
超級(jí)版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +21105 |

超級(jí)版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +21105 |
至尊木蟲 (著名寫手)
|
希望很大,前面兩個(gè)都interesting,這個(gè)評(píng)價(jià)比較高了 第二個(gè)其實(shí)是大修, 第三個(gè)稱論文表達(dá)方面不清楚,這些都可以改進(jìn),尤其是你要講清楚你的方法的優(yōu)點(diǎn),及跟現(xiàn)有方法的比較 我覺(jué)得如果能認(rèn)真回應(yīng)的話,中的希望很大 |
至尊木蟲 (知名作家)

木蟲 (小有名氣)
|
不用擔(dān)心那么多,你回答的好,審稿人也是通情達(dá)理的 關(guān)鍵還是論文的質(zhì)量,把你的特色突出出來(lái),他說(shuō)和別人的一樣,你就要說(shuō)出來(lái)不一樣的地方,有理有據(jù) 但是要顧及他的面子,別說(shuō)的太僵,先肯定他說(shuō)的有道理,然后說(shuō)自己的理由,或者說(shuō)自己贊同他的觀點(diǎn),文章中也有體現(xiàn),只是可能由于自己的原因沒(méi)有說(shuō)清楚之類的 |
木蟲 (小有名氣)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0856求調(diào)劑 +5 | 楒桉 2026-03-28 | 5/250 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 本科新能源科學(xué)與工程,一志愿華理能動(dòng)285求調(diào)劑 +3 | AZMK 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 275求調(diào)劑 +10 | Micky11223 2026-03-25 | 14/700 |
|
|
[考研] 346求調(diào)劑 一志愿070303有機(jī)化學(xué) +3 | 蘿卜燉青菜 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0856求調(diào)劑 +11 | zhn03 2026-03-25 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 材料277求調(diào)劑 +7 | min3 2026-03-24 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)材料與化工方向336分 +8 | 辰沐5211314 2026-03-26 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南京航空航天大學(xué)材料學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑 +3 | @taotao 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +4 | Sanmu-124 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿北京化工大學(xué) 070300 學(xué)碩 336分 求調(diào)劑 +9 | vv迷 2026-03-22 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 283求調(diào)劑(080500) +4 | A child 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 315調(diào)劑 +4 | 0860求調(diào)劑 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[碩博家園] 北京林業(yè)大學(xué)碩導(dǎo)招生廣告 +6 | kongweilin 2026-03-26 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研]
材料學(xué)碩,求調(diào)劑
6+5
|
糖葫蘆888ll 2026-03-22 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 341求調(diào)劑 +7 | 青檸檬1 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 材料專碩 335 分求調(diào)劑 +4 | 拒絕冷暴力 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 0854AI CV方向招收調(diào)劑 +4 | 章小魚567 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +3 | 李李不服輸 2026-03-25 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 318求調(diào)劑 +3 | plum李子 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿武理085500機(jī)械專業(yè)總分300求調(diào)劑 +3 | an10101 2026-03-24 | 7/350 |
|