| 查看: 2638 | 回復(fù): 12 | |||
tuerqier新蟲 (正式寫手)
|
[交流]
審稿人把我的論文和原始的nature上的論文都貶了,如何在Physica A申訴 已有6人參與
|
||
|
我研讀了一篇11年Nature上一封面論文ARTICLE,做了些小小改動(dòng)和創(chuàng)新,投到Physica A 去年7月份投稿Physica A,9月收到一審意見,就一個(gè)審稿人要求修改,然后10月底投出修改稿 2月收到信件原來審稿人找不到了,叫我再找5個(gè)審稿人,我也沒熟人就在參考文獻(xiàn)中找了10個(gè) 具體見http://www.gaoyang168.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=6951058 今天收到審稿意見如下,把我的論文和原始的nature上的論文都貶了,就給了我篇Plos One (那篇Plos One我寫之前就看過,是重新討論了Nature上那篇,但我沒覺得有重大突破,所以主要參考Nature上原始工作) 請問我這種情況該申訴嗎?如何申訴?謝謝! Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #2: This is a sloppy, simplistic, and hastily assembled paper on the structural controllability of networks. The basic model of this paper -- which is derived straight from (這是11年Nature上一篇封面論文ARTICLE) is a flawed model: a network of integrators. For example, the modeling approach does not allow for stable dynamics -- the A matrix always has a trace of 0 (sum of e-values is 0). This is just one but a huge host of problems with this vacuous modeling approach. See Cowan et al. for more information: http://www.plosone.org/article/i ... ournal.pone.0038398 In short, the present paper suffers from the same poorly conceived modeling framework as in the original "seminal" paper by (同上Nature論文) and then puts together a simple set of results on this bad modeling paradigm. Other comments speaking to the poor effort in assembling the manuscript 1) The figures are hard to read 2) the references are so poorly formatted as to be embarrassing. Titles are missing, capitalization is all over the place, and there are references such as [13] |
至尊木蟲 (知名作家)
愛八卦愛生活
木蟲 (著名寫手)
新蟲 (正式寫手)
木蟲 (著名寫手)
木蟲 (正式寫手)
新蟲 (正式寫手)
|
有什么問題嗎?論文正文和參考文獻(xiàn)寫的很清楚,是在nature那篇基礎(chǔ)上的 審稿人也提到 In short, the present paper suffers from the same poorly conceived modeling framework as in the original "seminal" paper by (同上Nature論文) and then puts together a simple set of results on this bad modeling paradigm. 關(guān)鍵這審稿意見,nature上那篇種子論文已被貶,我基本連修改余地都沒有 [ Last edited by tuerqier on 2014-3-17 at 14:24 ] |
木蟲 (正式寫手)
木蟲 (著名寫手)
新蟲 (正式寫手)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 354求調(diào)劑 +4 | Tyoumou 2026-03-18 | 7/350 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 274求調(diào)劑 +5 | S.H1 2026-03-18 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 材料專業(yè)求調(diào)劑 +5 | hanamiko 2026-03-18 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 299求調(diào)劑 +5 | △小透明* 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 工科材料085601 279求調(diào)劑 +6 | 困于星晨 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考博] 26博士申請 +3 | 1042136743 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 梁成偉老師課題組歡迎你的加入 +8 | 一鴨鴨喲 2026-03-14 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +3 | 淇ya_~ 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿,福州大學(xué)材料專碩339分求調(diào)劑 +3 | 木子momo青爭 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 070303 總分349求調(diào)劑 +3 | LJY9966 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 288求調(diào)劑 +4 | 奇點(diǎn)0314 2026-03-14 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 中科大材料專碩319求調(diào)劑 +3 | 孟鑫材料 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 265求調(diào)劑 +4 | 威化餅07 2026-03-12 | 4/200 |
|
|
[基金申請] 現(xiàn)在如何回避去年的某一個(gè)專家,不知道名字 +3 | zk200107 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 330求調(diào)劑 +3 | ?醬給調(diào)劑跪了 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] [0860]321分求調(diào)劑,ab區(qū)皆可 +4 | 寶貴熱 2026-03-13 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +3 | 冬十三 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 290求調(diào)劑 +7 | ADT 2026-03-12 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 289求調(diào)劑 +3 | 李政瑩 2026-03-12 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 290求調(diào)劑 +3 | ADT 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|