| 5 | 2/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 5906 | 回復: 30 | |||
| 當前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
F_Shaw捐助貴賓 (著名寫手)
|
[交流]
兩個審稿人給出了大改,但Associate Editor給了拒稿 已有3人參與
|
||
|
Dear Dr. XXXX, Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that they are advising that we consider accepting your paper after major revision. However the needed revisions are too substantion to allow the paper to proceed without a second round of review. Please consider my rejection this version a "soft" decision. Both reviewers have indicated that they would like to see the revision and they will be invited to review the new submission. Both reviewers have agreed to be identified. XXXX is Reviewer #1, and XXXXX is Reivewer #2. Both reviewers have downloaded files in addition to the comments listed below. Let me know if you have any problems downloading this files. The one issue that must be addressed in a revision is a clear distinguition from previous publihsed papers. It is fine to document how new data supports conclusions made in prior work, but these must be significant advances and you must be clear as to why the new information either proves or disproves previous studies. Considering the extent of revision needed, I have not provided any editorial input to this version. I would be willing to help you with the revision prior to your formal resubmission. The easiest way to do this is for you to email me your revised manuscript (XXXXXXX) and we can work outside of the Elsevier system. ———————————————— Reviewer #1: The purpose of this paper, as poorly stated in lines 90-95,XXXXXX. I completely re-wrote this paper because without doing so, it would have been impossible to understand the aim of the work. Although the paper is very poorly written, it may be worthy of publication with major revisions. I have two major objections (items 1-2 below) and several recommendations for the authors. XXXXXXX ———————————————— Reviewer #2: The manuscript presented a valuable case study on XXXXX. XXXXXXXXXX. The data analysis is logical, the conclusions are convincing in general. The figures and tables are largely adequate to support the points made in the current manusript. The length of the manuscript is about right, although it could be slightly longer if the authors are going to make revisions according to the reviewer's suggestions. Major issues with the current manuscript include the following: XXXXXXXXX ______________________ 兩個審稿人提了很多意見,Associate Editor的意思是在我重投之前,可以協(xié)助我修改,工作量有點大啊! 各位蟲友有沒有這樣的經歷,像這樣機會大不大? [ Last edited by F_Shaw on 2014-4-11 at 13:58 ] |

捐助貴賓 (著名寫手)

![]() ![]() ![]() |
鐵桿木蟲 (知名作家)

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 生物學071000 329分求調劑 +5 | 我愛生物生物愛?/a> 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 尋找調劑 +4 | 倔強芒? 2026-03-21 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 319求調劑 +4 | 小力氣珂珂 2026-03-20 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 311求調劑 +3 | 26研0 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 303求調劑 +5 | 安憶靈 2026-03-22 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 280求調劑 +11 | 咕嚕曉曉 2026-03-18 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南大,0703化學,分數336,求調劑 +3 | 收到VS 2026-03-21 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 求助 +5 | 夢里的無言 2026-03-21 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 材料 271求調劑 +5 | 展信悅_ 2026-03-21 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 296求調劑 +4 | www_q 2026-03-20 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 求調劑 +3 | 白QF 2026-03-21 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 346求調劑[0856] +4 | WayneLim327 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程(專)一志愿985 初試335求調劑 +3 | hiloiy 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿重慶大學085700資源與環(huán)境專碩,總分308求調劑 +3 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 274求調劑 +10 | S.H1 2026-03-18 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 材料學碩297已過四六級求調劑推薦 +11 | adaie 2026-03-19 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 求調劑 +3 | eation27 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 328求調劑,英語六級551,有科研經歷 +4 | 生物工程調劑 2026-03-16 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 277調劑 +5 | 自由煎餅果子 2026-03-16 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 085601求調劑 +4 | Du.11 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|