| 查看: 2938 | 回復: 11 | ||
awyatn銀蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
TSCAS2-Resubmit after Minor Revision
|
|
|
resubmit了3次,現(xiàn)在是Resubmit after Minor Revision,都要瘋掉了!一下comments Dear XXX: I am writing to inform you that the review process for your paper has been completed. Based on the recommendation of the Associate Editor, your paper cannot be accepted for publication in the present form.I suggest that you revise the manuscript to incorporate the reviewers' comments and/or suggestions and resubmit the revised version. In your revision, please carefully address all concerns raised by the reviewers. Please note that no second revision will be granted. If you fail to address any review comment, your manuscript will be rejected.Your revision should be submitted to the same web system within the next three weeks for further processing. Failure to do so will result in the elimination of your manuscript from the system. Please contact us if there is an emergency that prevents you from meeting the deadline. Thank you for considering the Transactions on CAS II. Jose Silva-Martinez, Editor-in-Chief Andreas Demosthenous, Deputy Editor-in-Chief IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II ----------------------------------------------------------------- Title: XXXX Authors: XXXX Reviewers' and Associate Editor's Comments ========================================== Recommendation -------------- Resubmit after Minor Revision Comments to the Author ---------------------- The paper has been improved with respect to its previous version and almost all the concerns have been addressed and solved. I am suggesting a further review run in which I am asking to the authors mostly to strongly improve the English which is still far from the standard required for this journal. Key references that must be included: ------------------------------------- Review Number 1. ***************** Does the revision adequately address the concerns expressed in the original review? Yes. Comments to the Author ---------------------- The authors have certainly improved the manuscript based on the previous review. However, there are still some more formatting/grammatical errors present, and the changes have been suggested. The authors are requested to carefully proof-read their paper to be able to bring it to the level of a TCAS-II publication. Recommendations given by section for further improvement: XXXXXXXX Missing Key References: Review Number 2. ***************** Does the revision adequately address the concerns expressed in the original review? Yes. Comments to the Author ---------------------- The authors have addressed the questions. No more comment. Missing Key References: Review Number 3. ***************** Does the revision adequately address the concerns expressed in the original review? Yes. Comments to the Author ---------------------- At this revision, authors have answered all my concerns. By introducing a pulse generation tuning circuit, the work presents a XXX with enhanced XXX Although the technique behind is not very advanced, it provides an effective solution and solid measurement results. Missing Key References: Review Number 4. ***************** Comments to the Author ---------------------- Missing Key References: Review Number 5. ***************** Does the revision adequately address the concerns expressed in the original review? Partially. Comments to the Author ---------------------- Previous comments have only been partially addressed. Explanation is not very clear. It is not clear what is the novelty of the proposed approach and what are advantages/difference with repsect to prior works. Missing Key References: 以上是5為reviewer的意見,前4位基本上沒有什么問題了就是論文english比較爛,最后一位我覺得有點難纏,我已經(jīng)解釋了,但是還是說我沒有novelty!我都懷疑他是否有沒有仔細讀我的文章,介于結論是“resubmit after minor revision”,我還需要理他嗎? 關鍵是他們都說我的english爛,看了我要好好潤色一下了,大家有沒有比較好的有償潤色服務可以推薦一下? |

銀蟲 (小有名氣)

至尊木蟲 (知名作家)

|
本帖內(nèi)容被屏蔽 |
金蟲 (正式寫手)

銀蟲 (小有名氣)

銀蟲 (小有名氣)
小弟,之前寫過半導體學報電子學報什么的英文文章,這次是第一次寫真正意思上的英文論文,很是沒有把握,算是摸著石頭過河吧,和那些大牛沒沒法比啊 ,這個過程真的很漫長而無助,多謝蟲友們的一些幫助,現(xiàn)在我冒昧的把這次投稿經(jīng)歷寫出來,希望能幫助后面的蟲友們,貽笑大方了哈。審稿進度很慢,去年10月份投的初稿,要3個月后給第一次結果,是“Reject with encouragement for resubmission (Major revision)”,一共3位評審人,給的意見很中肯。 按要求改了11月份上傳,這次還是“Reject with encouragement for resubmission (Major revision)”,而且審稿專家變成5位了,很明顯是另一波人,沒有太多技術意見,有些感覺不是很懂整個領域,只有一位專家的問題很刁鉆,說我的沒有創(chuàng)新性。 沒辦法,再改,并且針對性回答專家意見;再投,1個月后,結果是“Resubmit after Minor Revision for Review”,還是上一次的5位專家,基本上已經(jīng)沒有技術意見,那位專家依然偏執(zhí)的認為我沒有創(chuàng)新性,同時編輯說我英文爛,要求3周內(nèi)給最終稿,否則不再受理,所以很著急的修改之,并在回復中謙虛而有針對性的回答了問題。 之后,又是漫長的等等,1個月后沒消息,給特指編輯發(fā)信,沒用,只好給其他人員發(fā),一位可能是審稿人說已經(jīng)將意見提交,一位說很快會給意見,但是過了至少3天才在網(wǎng)址上給了“Accept as is”,還沒給回復信,還要等。 |

金蟲 (正式寫手)

金蟲 (正式寫手)

銀蟲 (小有名氣)

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 286分人工智能專業(yè)請求調(diào)劑愿意跨考! +4 | lemonzzn 2026-03-17 | 8/400 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +5 | 十三加油 2026-03-21 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工(0856)304求 B區(qū) 調(diào)劑 +3 | 邱gl 2026-03-21 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中國石油大學(華東) 本科齊魯工業(yè)大學 +3 | 石能偉 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 307求調(diào)劑 +10 | 冷笙123 2026-03-17 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 324分 085600材料化工求調(diào)劑 +4 | llllkkkhh 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +5 | 冬十三 2026-03-18 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中海洋材料工程專碩330分求調(diào)劑 +8 | 小材化本科 2026-03-18 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 330求調(diào)劑 +4 | 小材化本科 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿 西北大學 ,070300化學學碩,總分287,雙非一本,求調(diào)劑。 +4 | 晨昏線與星海 2026-03-19 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 藥學383 求調(diào)劑 +3 | 藥學chy 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑一志愿南京航空航天大學289分 +3 | @taotao 2026-03-19 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0817 化學工程 299分求調(diào)劑 有科研經(jīng)歷 有二區(qū)文章 +22 | rare12345 2026-03-18 | 22/1100 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華中農(nóng)業(yè)071010,總分320求調(diào)劑 +3 | 困困困困坤坤 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 286求調(diào)劑 +6 | lemonzzn 2026-03-16 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿福大288有機化學,求調(diào)劑 +3 | 小木蟲200408204 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 收復試調(diào)劑生 +4 | 雨后秋荷 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 考研求調(diào)劑 +3 | 橘頌. 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
[碩博家園] 湖北工業(yè)大學 生命科學與健康學院-課題組招收2026級食品/生物方向碩士 +3 | 1喜春8 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 302求調(diào)劑 +4 | 小賈同學123 2026-03-15 | 8/400 |
|