| 查看: 1977 | 回復(fù): 10 | ||
[交流]
corrosion science狀態(tài)求助 已有3人參與
|

金蟲 (著名寫手)

銀蟲 (小有名氣)




|
Reviewers' comments: (1) The research highlights are unintelligible. Possibly because of the undefined symbols, or possibly because of poor highlights. However, they are not acceptable. (2) No mesure of reproducibility. The order of the polarisation curves in each figure appears totally random. Any trends here, must come from a statistically derived scatter band through reproducibility experiments. (3) Do not use the word "anti-corrosion". There are correct and accepted words for this. (4) The introduction should not describe "low cost". That is irrelevant and there are no costs or reference to this provided. (5) The word "behavior" should be used in singular form only. The same is true for "literature", "discussion" and "research". (6) Polarization curves show no pitting potentials. It is hard to see where these numbers come from. (7) No trends are shown in Fig 3. In addition, the parameters are all independent of the chloride concentration, which for `Epit at least, is nonsense. (8) The use of 5 mV/s is too fast to determine any form of corrosion parameter to be determined. It will not give a icorr, Ecorr or Epit. (9) It is hard to see how these electrodes were made. The only description is Fig 1, which is a poor photo. Does the electrode have only one side with exposed metal, or are both sides exposed. The image in Fig 1 appears to show the left end fully coated and the right end fully exposed. Without a full description, the electrochemistry is not clear at all. (10) The XPS spectra in Fig 5 are after "electrochemically corroded in 1 M NaCl solution". However, the caption does not state at what potential, or whether this was after some potential scan. Perhaps it was after one of the polarization curves? Whatever it is, it is undefined. (11) Further, if it is after polarisation curve measurement, then the XPS does not show any sort of passive film, since the metal has been corroding actively. Mostly what is seen here is corrosion product. The problem with this paper is that it does not tell the reader exactly what was done and how it was done. (12) The current density scale in Fig 2 is a complete mystery. The units of the y axes are "10 mA/mm^2". What does this mean???? (13) There are many further major problems with this paper, both in the poor description of what was done, in the analysis of the results and in the interpretation. The subject is interesting, but the paper is not rigorous. (14) The paper should not be published in this present state. Reject. |


銀蟲 (小有名氣)

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +4 | 冬十三 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑,求各位老師收留 +9 | 秋有木北 2026-03-14 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 08工科 320總分 求調(diào)劑 +5 | 梨花珞晚風(fēng) 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工一志愿南昌大學(xué)327求調(diào)劑推薦 +8 | Ncdx123456 2026-03-13 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 298-一志愿中國農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)-求調(diào)劑 +7 | 手機用戶 2026-03-17 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 265求調(diào)劑 +3 | 梁梁校校 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
[基金申請] 被我言中:新模板不強調(diào)格式了,假專家開始管格式了 +4 | beefly 2026-03-14 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 考研化學(xué)學(xué)碩調(diào)劑,一志愿985 +4 | 張vvvv 2026-03-15 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 材料專碩326求調(diào)劑 +6 | 墨煜姒莘 2026-03-15 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 211本,11408一志愿中科院277分,曾在中科院自動化所實習(xí) +6 | Losir 2026-03-12 | 7/350 |
|
|
[基金申請] 國自科面上基金字體 +6 | iwuli 2026-03-12 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 機械專碩325,尋找調(diào)劑院校 +3 | y9999 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 0703一志愿211 285分求調(diào)劑 +5 | ly3471z 2026-03-13 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 中科院材料273求調(diào)劑 +4 | yzydy 2026-03-15 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 復(fù)試調(diào)劑 +4 | z1z2z3879 2026-03-14 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 材料080500調(diào)劑求收留 +3 | 一顆meteor 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程調(diào)劑 +9 | 咪咪空空 2026-03-12 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +4 | 芬達46 2026-03-12 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +3 | 是Lupa啊 2026-03-12 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 277求調(diào)劑 +4 | anchor17 2026-03-12 | 4/200 |
|