| 查看: 1980 | 回復(fù): 10 | ||
[交流]
corrosion science狀態(tài)求助 已有3人參與
|

金蟲 (著名寫手)

銀蟲 (小有名氣)




|
Reviewers' comments: (1) The research highlights are unintelligible. Possibly because of the undefined symbols, or possibly because of poor highlights. However, they are not acceptable. (2) No mesure of reproducibility. The order of the polarisation curves in each figure appears totally random. Any trends here, must come from a statistically derived scatter band through reproducibility experiments. (3) Do not use the word "anti-corrosion". There are correct and accepted words for this. (4) The introduction should not describe "low cost". That is irrelevant and there are no costs or reference to this provided. (5) The word "behavior" should be used in singular form only. The same is true for "literature", "discussion" and "research". (6) Polarization curves show no pitting potentials. It is hard to see where these numbers come from. (7) No trends are shown in Fig 3. In addition, the parameters are all independent of the chloride concentration, which for `Epit at least, is nonsense. (8) The use of 5 mV/s is too fast to determine any form of corrosion parameter to be determined. It will not give a icorr, Ecorr or Epit. (9) It is hard to see how these electrodes were made. The only description is Fig 1, which is a poor photo. Does the electrode have only one side with exposed metal, or are both sides exposed. The image in Fig 1 appears to show the left end fully coated and the right end fully exposed. Without a full description, the electrochemistry is not clear at all. (10) The XPS spectra in Fig 5 are after "electrochemically corroded in 1 M NaCl solution". However, the caption does not state at what potential, or whether this was after some potential scan. Perhaps it was after one of the polarization curves? Whatever it is, it is undefined. (11) Further, if it is after polarisation curve measurement, then the XPS does not show any sort of passive film, since the metal has been corroding actively. Mostly what is seen here is corrosion product. The problem with this paper is that it does not tell the reader exactly what was done and how it was done. (12) The current density scale in Fig 2 is a complete mystery. The units of the y axes are "10 mA/mm^2". What does this mean???? (13) There are many further major problems with this paper, both in the poor description of what was done, in the analysis of the results and in the interpretation. The subject is interesting, but the paper is not rigorous. (14) The paper should not be published in this present state. Reject. |


銀蟲 (小有名氣)

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿吉林大學(xué)材料學(xué)碩321求調(diào)劑 +9 | Ymlll 2026-03-18 | 12/600 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿武漢理工材料工程專碩調(diào)劑 +5 | Doleres 2026-03-19 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 梁成偉老師課題組歡迎你的加入 +9 | 一鴨鴨喲 2026-03-14 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工調(diào)劑 324分 +10 | llllkkkhh 2026-03-18 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 317求調(diào)劑 +3 | 申子申申 2026-03-19 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑,一志愿:南京航空航天大學(xué)大學(xué) ,080500材料科學(xué)與工程學(xué)碩,總分289分 +3 | @taotao 2026-03-19 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0817調(diào)劑 +3 | 沒(méi)有答案_ 2026-03-14 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +4 | 冬十三 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿武理材料305分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 想上岸的鯉魚 2026-03-18 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 297求調(diào)劑 +8 | 戲精丹丹丹 2026-03-17 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)336分求調(diào)劑 +6 | zbzihdhd 2026-03-15 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 265求調(diào)劑 +3 | 梁梁校校 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考博] 26申博 +4 | 八6八68 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 東南大學(xué)364求調(diào)劑 +5 | JasonYuiui 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 333求調(diào)劑 +3 | 文思客 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿211 0703方向310分求調(diào)劑 +3 | 努力奮斗112 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 318求調(diào)劑 +3 | Yanyali 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 070303 總分349求調(diào)劑 +3 | LJY9966 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 297求調(diào)劑 +4 | 學(xué)海漂泊 2026-03-13 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +7 | 7712b 2026-03-13 | 7/350 |
|