| 查看: 4333 | 回復: 14 | |||
[求助]
一審回來了,有點看不懂,大牛們看看是怎么回事,急啊 已有4人參與
|
|||
|
投的是International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems,2個月才回復意見,2個審稿意見,第一個還好,不痛不癢的問題,應該能回答,第二個審稿意見,看著基本是悲劇的節(jié)奏,還有必要改嗎? 感覺明顯是刁難啊,各位大牛支招,謝謝了。 編輯給的結(jié)論是 “Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. ” 感覺是回復模版,給了3個月 修改期限,沒說大修小修,只顯示是“Revise”。 第二審稿專家意見: Reviewer #2: The paper is technically sound. The acknowledgement of the work of others by references is acceptable. The organization and presentation of the manuscript is marginal to poor. The relevance and completeness of the work remain insufficient and must be improved. English style must be improved. Many typos, grammatical and structural errors are depicted. The paper must be proofread before its submission. The paper cannot be accepted in this form. The authors have to face the challenging concern of revisit the structure of the whole paper in terms of style, organization and presentation of the results. The style in which the material is presented is rough. The paper can be reappraised after major revision. Many redundant notations are depicted through the entire paper. Variables used in hated letters then in simple letters. A square of a vector term, with no prior definition to be given for such an operator, is used. A list of nomenclature is necessary to understand the notations. To justify the modelization introduced in section 3, references must be cited within the equation presentation (in particular, in sub-section 3.2). Notations used are very confusing, for example si refers to an independent variable then to sin(theta_i), x_hat in (19), (22) is unknown. The notations and formulation must be revisited entirely. Sign problem depicted in (27) (from Rc2 to Fxi2). Vectors are used in row form then column for the same amounts. It is completely rushed. RTiTi-1 is not defined explicitly in pp.5. The reader cannot trust the results given by (33) and (34). References must accompany properties introduced in section 4. Absolute value notation is used inappropriately with vector terms without any prior definition (in particular in (48), (49)). The presentation of the design is referring to vector terms using scalar operators. An introduction of these notations applied to vector forms with adapted definitions is required. Theorem in pp. 7 is badly posed/stated. It must be reorganized. Demonstration of the proposed Theorem may work for scalar case, but, it is not straightforward for vector case. The whole proof must be revisited to use a formulation adapted to vector terms.The whole presentation of the paper is marginal. Comparison and improvement of the results in terms of error performance is less significant (very small). 提了一大堆 格式上的問題,尤其是矩陣和矢量方面的,這些平時在寫論文過程中其實都沒有太在意,改起來真摸不到頭腦?雌饋硎且笸ㄆ薷,真是郁悶,要花好多精力了,另有幾個問題看不懂: 1! A square of a vector term, with no prior definition to be given for such an operator, is used.” 這句什么意思? 矢量的平方之前沒有定義好?? 2!癆 list of nomenclature is necessary to understand the notations. ” 這個是說要有一個 術語 表嗎? 是在文章開頭弄個 縮寫表,還是在 最后加個 附錄好? 之前沒弄過這個。 3!癆bsolute value notation is used inappropriately with vector terms without any prior definition” 這里我把誤差 e的絕對值分段函數(shù)的形式表示,如果e表示多個關節(jié)的誤差,也就是矢量表示,那它的絕對值是不是應該每個元素表達出來呢? 4。“ An introduction of these notations applied to vector forms with adapted definitions is required” 和“The whole proof must be revisited to use a formulation adapted to vector terms.” 矢量運算 還要定義? 不大懂要定義什么? 這個審稿專家問題很多,但是都沒有具體指導怎么改才符合他的胃口,唉 有點不知如何下手。抓住標量運算和矢量運算的寫法上,這個平時真沒怎么注意,也不知道如何下手,看了一些論文,感覺大家都模棱兩可的。 5!癈omparison and improvement of the results in terms of error performance is less significant (very small).” 最后說我兩種控制算法的比較結(jié)果 用誤差性能來表達不合適 還是說意義不大? 還是說用其他方式表達?還是 說性能比較結(jié)果不理想?其實我的控制算法誤差是 我的對比控制算法的五分之一左右,難道這個還不夠好? 這個審稿專家看的很細,幾乎對格式上有潔癖啊,格式上實在不知道這個審稿專家的口味如何,也不推薦標準格式給個參考,我怕改了也不符他胃口,唉,指望這論文畢業(yè)呢,太糾結(jié)了? 大牛們幫幫忙,要不要回復呢?還是改投呢?或者大牛對這種格式上有好的建議嗎? 這里先謝過了。 另外這個大修回去之后,第二審稿人是不是還要重新審一遍,又要修改一次,時間要被拖長了。。。 |
銀蟲 (正式寫手)
|
實際上這個審稿人對樓主的工作還是認可的,主要缺陷有1)論文撰寫的組織結(jié)構(gòu)需要修改,表達也有待于改進,論文的完整性似乎也有待于提高,有較多的英語單詞,愈發(fā)和結(jié)構(gòu)錯誤,需要修改后再重投。后面的具體問題較多,主要是某些變量沒有給出清楚的定義,這和中文不一樣(中文是默認大家都懂,而外文講究來龍去脈,不能省略) 1)矢量的平方(包括矢量)沒有給出明確的定義;2)給出術語表/縮寫表,一般在參考文獻之前;3)同1;絕對值函數(shù)用于矢量不合適。4)可能是標量和矢量弄混了,樓主可以把每個矢量都介紹清楚了(中文是默認大家都懂,而外文講究來龍去脈,不能省略),再給出標量形式即可。5)用誤差大小來進行結(jié)果比較和談如何提高的意義不大,是否樓主設定的誤差太大(1/5)了。 ![]() |
銀蟲 (小有名氣)
超級版主 (文學泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗: +21105 |
金蟲 (正式寫手)
銀蟲 (正式寫手)
| 矢量的平方(包括矢量)沒有給出明確的定義。Lz, 我覺得就是物理含義,本人只知道數(shù)學上關于矢量的定義(實際上,數(shù)學里也定義了一個體系才給的定義,這樣物理含義明確),對于機器人體系我是外行,也是行走嗎?對于樓主文中的是什么,請樓主自己參悟;關于其平方,樓主為什么要用這個參數(shù),啥物理含義?當然其表達式也算是其定義(可能樓主給了)。關于矢量的絕對值,要弄清楚其是啥物理含義,根據(jù)這個物理意義用才合適。關于誤差,為什么是對比算法誤差的20%,不是全部誤差(還是我沒有理解)?如果僅僅是算法之間的比較,(和實驗之間的)誤差不是應該是最小為好?當然其物理含義明確。至于以上幾個特別具體的問題,我覺得樓主是真的沒有在這里寫清楚,但是有一點必須明確,英文論文中的敘述不能按照中文寫作隨便省略,讓讀者去猜(特別是第一篇論文),這一猜首先在審稿人那里就不能過關了。這也是中文的引用率不高,而且無法重復結(jié)果的原因之一。 |
銀蟲 (小有名氣)
銀蟲 (小有名氣)
銀蟲 (小有名氣)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿中海洋材料工程專碩330分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 小材化本科 2026-03-18 | 5/250 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 化工學碩306求調(diào)劑 +10 | 42838695 2026-03-12 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 312求調(diào)劑 +8 | 陌宸希 2026-03-16 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學調(diào)劑 +4 | pupcoco 2026-03-17 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 303求調(diào)劑 +4 | 睿08 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 307求調(diào)劑 +3 | 冷笙123 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程專碩調(diào)劑 +5 | 204818@lcx 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 085601求調(diào)劑 +4 | Du.11 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
[論文投稿] 有沒有大佬發(fā)小論文能帶我個二作 +3 | 增銳漏人 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +4 | ahbd 2026-03-14 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 085600調(diào)劑 +5 | 漾漾123sun 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 0856求調(diào)劑 +3 | 劉夢微 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研]
|
笨笨兔子 2026-03-12 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 265求調(diào)劑 +4 | 威化餅07 2026-03-12 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 復試調(diào)劑 +3 | 呼呼?~+123456 2026-03-14 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 求材料調(diào)劑 085600英一數(shù)二總分302 前三科235 精通機器學習 一志愿哈工大 +4 | 林yaxin 2026-03-12 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +3 | 冬十三 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 295求調(diào)劑 +3 | 小匕仔汁 2026-03-12 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 290求調(diào)劑 +7 | ADT 2026-03-12 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考博] 26讀博 +4 | Rui135246 2026-03-12 | 10/500 |
|