 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 4352 | 回復(fù): 14 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
一審回來了，有點看不懂，大牛們看看是怎么回事，急啊 已有4人參與
|
|||
|
投的是International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems，2個月才回復(fù)意見，2個審稿意見，第一個還好，不痛不癢的問題，應(yīng)該能回答，第二個審稿意見，看著基本是悲劇的節(jié)奏，還有必要改嗎？ 感覺明顯是刁難啊，各位大牛支招，謝謝了。 編輯給的結(jié)論是 “Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. ” 感覺是回復(fù)模版，給了3個月 修改期限，沒說大修小修，只顯示是“Revise”。 第二審稿專家意見： Reviewer #2: The paper is technically sound. The acknowledgement of the work of others by references is acceptable. The organization and presentation of the manuscript is marginal to poor. The relevance and completeness of the work remain insufficient and must be improved. English style must be improved. Many typos, grammatical and structural errors are depicted. The paper must be proofread before its submission. The paper cannot be accepted in this form. The authors have to face the challenging concern of revisit the structure of the whole paper in terms of style, organization and presentation of the results. The style in which the material is presented is rough. The paper can be reappraised after major revision. Many redundant notations are depicted through the entire paper. Variables used in hated letters then in simple letters. A square of a vector term, with no prior definition to be given for such an operator, is used. A list of nomenclature is necessary to understand the notations. To justify the modelization introduced in section 3, references must be cited within the equation presentation (in particular, in sub-section 3.2). Notations used are very confusing, for example si refers to an independent variable then to sin(theta_i), x_hat in (19), (22) is unknown. The notations and formulation must be revisited entirely. Sign problem depicted in (27) (from Rc2 to Fxi2). Vectors are used in row form then column for the same amounts. It is completely rushed. RTiTi-1 is not defined explicitly in pp.5. The reader cannot trust the results given by (33) and (34). References must accompany properties introduced in section 4. Absolute value notation is used inappropriately with vector terms without any prior definition (in particular in (48), (49)). The presentation of the design is referring to vector terms using scalar operators. An introduction of these notations applied to vector forms with adapted definitions is required. Theorem in pp. 7 is badly posed/stated. It must be reorganized. Demonstration of the proposed Theorem may work for scalar case, but, it is not straightforward for vector case. The whole proof must be revisited to use a formulation adapted to vector terms.The whole presentation of the paper is marginal. Comparison and improvement of the results in terms of error performance is less significant (very small). 提了一大堆 格式上的問題，尤其是矩陣和矢量方面的，這些平時在寫論文過程中其實都沒有太在意，改起來真摸不到頭腦�？雌饋硎且笸ㄆ薷�，真是郁悶，要花好多精力了，另有幾個問題看不懂： 1�！� A square of a vector term, with no prior definition to be given for such an operator, is used.” 這句什么意思？ 矢量的平方之前沒有定義好？？ 2�！癆 list of nomenclature is necessary to understand the notations. ” 這個是說要有一個 術(shù)語 表嗎？ 是在文章開頭弄個 縮寫表，還是在 最后加個 附錄好？ 之前沒弄過這個。 3。“Absolute value notation is used inappropriately with vector terms without any prior definition” 這里我把誤差 e的絕對值分段函數(shù)的形式表示，如果e表示多個關(guān)節(jié)的誤差，也就是矢量表示，那它的絕對值是不是應(yīng)該每個元素表達(dá)出來呢？ 4�！� An introduction of these notations applied to vector forms with adapted definitions is required” 和“The whole proof must be revisited to use a formulation adapted to vector terms.” 矢量運算 還要定義？ 不大懂要定義什么？ 這個審稿專家問題很多，但是都沒有具體指導(dǎo)怎么改才符合他的胃口，唉 有點不知如何下手。抓住標(biāo)量運算和矢量運算的寫法上，這個平時真沒怎么注意，也不知道如何下手，看了一些論文，感覺大家都模棱兩可的。 5�！癈omparison and improvement of the results in terms of error performance is less significant (very small).” 最后說我兩種控制算法的比較結(jié)果 用誤差性能來表達(dá)不合適 還是說意義不大？ 還是說用其他方式表達(dá)？還是 說性能比較結(jié)果不理想？其實我的控制算法誤差是 我的對比控制算法的五分之一左右，難道這個還不夠好？ 這個審稿專家看的很細(xì)，幾乎對格式上有潔癖啊，格式上實在不知道這個審稿專家的口味如何，也不推薦標(biāo)準(zhǔn)格式給個參考，我怕改了也不符他胃口，唉，指望這論文畢業(yè)呢，太糾結(jié)了？ 大牛們幫幫忙，要不要回復(fù)呢？還是改投呢？或者大牛對這種格式上有好的建議嗎？ 這里先謝過了。 另外這個大修回去之后，第二審稿人是不是還要重新審一遍，又要修改一次，時間要被拖長了。。。 |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
一志愿華東理工大學(xué)081700，初試分?jǐn)?shù)271
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
081700 調(diào)劑 267分
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
材料調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
一志愿河北工業(yè)大學(xué)0817化工278分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
-
085600材料與化工調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有12人回復(fù)
-
材料292調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
291求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
-
材料專碩找調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
材料專業(yè)求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
-
一志愿國科過程所081700，274求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)價值貼推薦，對您同樣有幫助:
- 文章被編輯發(fā)回來修改，我有點看不懂啥意思，求解答
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- 大家進(jìn)來幫我看一看，主編復(fù)審的意思究竟如何！
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
- SCI一審意見結(jié)果回來了，淡定不了嘍！懇請各位大牛進(jìn)來幫忙！
已經(jīng)有30人回復(fù)
littletomas
銀蟲 (小有名氣)
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 2390.3
- 散金: 162
- 帖子: 100
- 在線: 124.1小時
- 蟲號: 1272610
- 注冊: 2011-04-21
- 專業(yè): 機(jī)構(gòu)學(xué)與機(jī)器人
9樓2014-08-14 20:11:21
nono2009
超級版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
專家經(jīng)驗: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 應(yīng)助: 28684 (院士)
- 貴賓: 513.911
- 金幣: 2555230
- 散金: 27828
- 紅花: 2148
- 沙發(fā): 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在線: 65200.9小時
- 蟲號: 827383
- 注冊: 2009-08-13
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 工程熱物理與能源利用
- 管轄: 科研家籌備委員會
2樓2014-08-14 06:14:50
engp8908
銀蟲 (正式寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 100 (初中生)
- 金幣: 2336.2
- 紅花: 5
- 帖子: 533
- 在線: 179.5小時
- 蟲號: 3329017
- 注冊: 2014-07-18
- 專業(yè): 分離過程
【答案】應(yīng)助回帖
感謝參與，應(yīng)助指數(shù) +1
|
實際上這個審稿人對樓主的工作還是認(rèn)可的，主要缺陷有1）論文撰寫的組織結(jié)構(gòu)需要修改，表達(dá)也有待于改進(jìn)，論文的完整性似乎也有待于提高，有較多的英語單詞，愈發(fā)和結(jié)構(gòu)錯誤，需要修改后再重投。后面的具體問題較多，主要是某些變量沒有給出清楚的定義，這和中文不一樣（中文是默認(rèn)大家都懂，而外文講究來龍去脈，不能省略） 1）矢量的平方（包括矢量）沒有給出明確的定義；2）給出術(shù)語表/縮寫表，一般在參考文獻(xiàn)之前；3)同1；絕對值函數(shù)用于矢量不合適。4）可能是標(biāo)量和矢量弄混了，樓主可以把每個矢量都介紹清楚了（中文是默認(rèn)大家都懂，而外文講究來龍去脈，不能省略），再給出標(biāo)量形式即可。5）用誤差大小來進(jìn)行結(jié)果比較和談如何提高的意義不大，是否樓主設(shè)定的誤差太大（1/5）了。  |
3樓2014-08-14 06:47:23
mahongyuma
金蟲 (正式寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 9 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 339.3
- 散金: 1280
- 紅花: 4
- 帖子: 990
- 在線: 188.3小時
- 蟲號: 816723
- 注冊: 2009-07-27
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 基因表達(dá)調(diào)控與表觀遺傳學(xué)
4樓2014-08-14 07:27:21
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料專碩找調(diào)劑 +3 | 哈哈哈吼吼吼哈 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿211 初試270分 求調(diào)劑 +4 | 谷雨上岸 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 335求調(diào)劑 +3 | yuyu宇 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0854電子信息求調(diào)劑 +3 | α____ 2026-03-22 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +3 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-21 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中南化學(xué)（0703）總分337求調(diào)劑 +9 | niko- 2026-03-19 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 324求調(diào)劑 +6 | lucky呀呀呀鴨 2026-03-20 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 269專碩求調(diào)劑 +6 | 金恩貝 2026-03-21 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 資源與環(huán)境 調(diào)劑申請(333分) +5 | holy J 2026-03-21 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 初試 317 +7 | 半拉月丙 2026-03-20 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 278求調(diào)劑 +9 | 煙火先于春 2026-03-17 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 279求調(diào)劑 +5 | 紅衣隱官 2026-03-21 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +6 | Mqqqqqq 2026-03-19 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿西南交大，求調(diào)劑 +5 | 材化逐夢人 2026-03-18 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 274求調(diào)劑 +10 | S.H1 2026-03-18 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑求學(xué)校推薦 +3 | 伯樂29 2026-03-18 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑一志愿南京航空航天大學(xué)289分 +3 | @taotao 2026-03-19 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0856調(diào)劑，是學(xué)校就去 +8 | sllhht 2026-03-19 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料工程專碩調(diào)劑 +5 | 204818@lcx 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 收復(fù)試調(diào)劑生 +4 | 雨后秋荷 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|