| 26 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 3469 | 回復: 25 | |||
[交流]
5個審稿人3個小修,1個大修(我認為他沒看懂),1個拒,編輯拒。怎么辦?
|
|||
|
投了Construction and Building Materials,8月底投的,今天早上收到編輯的信,結果是: Dear Dr. ***, Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. Although they have encouraged improvement of the paper we feel that this submission falls short of the demanding standards required by the publisher and therefore I must reject it. I appreciate that this is disappointing news. For your guidance, I append the reviewers' comments below. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Yours sincerely, Professor Michael C Forde, PhD, FREng, FRSE, FACI Editor-in-Chief Construction & Building Materials ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer #1: The paper is well written and structured. Both rheological investigation and modelling are excellent, the story flows well but an overall revision of the english is needed I would suggest a revision of the english plus very few minor corrections: …… Reviewer #2: This paper presents a relatively large amount of rheological data that are used to model the linear viscoelastic behavior of ***. The whole approach of the paper is questionable, as well as some of the conclusions drawn by the authors. (我估計該reviewer是大修的意思,下面講了他對文中一些問題的看法,我認為他沒有理解我的意思,或者是我沒有表達清楚,說服他應該不是但問題。) …… Reviewer #3: The authors submitted two papers (Tile 1#; Tile 2#) to the Construction and Building Materials. The two papers are all about rheological behaviors of ***. So I recommend the authors to combine the two papers. Compared with "Tile 2#", the paper "Tile 1#" is more useful.(其中,Tile 1#編輯要求修改。其中Tile#1偏向實驗,Tile2#偏向理論。我估計該reviewer是拒稿的意思) Reviewer #5: The authors performed the linear viscoelastic modeling of***. DIfferent models were tested, by analyzing the Cole-Cole plot and Black diagram. Informative results were obtained and are believed to have significance for the researchers and readers in the field of construction and building materials. However, the paper is very poorly rewritten in English. I suggest the publication of this paper after major revision, especially in English usage. The other technical comments are as follows: (主要是語言,還有introduction要更加聚焦) …… Reviewer #6: The authors have interpreted the excellent results with creativity, and the results are important to engineering applications. Overall, it is sufficient novelty and significance to be published in CBM. Even though, there are some questions should be noted. (主要是語言和其他一些文字細節(jié)上的問題) …… 難道是這兩篇文章之間有取舍?我該怎么辦? |
» 搶金幣啦!回帖就可以得到:
+1/82
+1/74
+1/73
+1/45
+2/40
+1/23
+1/14
+1/11
+1/9
+1/9
+1/7
+1/7
+1/7
+1/6
+1/4
+1/3
+1/3
+1/3
+1/3
+1/2



| 26 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 085600 286分 材料求調劑 +10 | 麻辣魷魚 2026-03-27 | 11/550 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 317分 一志愿南理工材料工程 本科湖工大 求調劑 +10 | 芋泥小鈴鐺 2026-03-28 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿北京化工大學材料與化工(085600)296求調劑 +17 | 稻妻小編 2026-03-26 | 17/850 |
|
|
[考研] 調劑考研 +3 | 王杰一 2026-03-29 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 289求調劑 +13 | 新時代材料 2026-03-27 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 070300求調劑306分 +4 | 26要上岸 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南昌大學324求調劑 +7 | hanamiko 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 085404求調劑,總分309,本科經歷較為豐富 +4 | 來財aa 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 085701環(huán)境工程求調劑 +9 | 多久上課 2026-03-27 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 265求調劑 +8 | 小木蟲085600 2026-03-27 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南師大0703化學 275求調劑 +4 | Ripcord上岸 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料292調劑 +12 | 橘頌思美人 2026-03-23 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 求調劑 +6 | 林之夕 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 材料調劑 +8 | 匹克i 2026-03-23 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 生物學 296 求調劑 +4 | 朵朵- 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 材料考研求調劑 +3 | Dendel 2026-03-23 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 289求調劑 +17 | 碩星赴 2026-03-23 | 17/850 |
|
|
[考研] 334分 一志愿武理-080500 材料求調劑 +4 | 李李不服輸 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工304求B區(qū)調劑 +3 | 邱gl 2026-03-25 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿北化315 求調劑 +3 | akrrain 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|