 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 4260 | 回復(fù): 12 | ||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||
lijuanmin銅蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
投Analytical Chemistry,一個(gè)大修，一個(gè)拒稿，編輯給拒了，還用申訴嗎？ 已有7人參與
|
|
|
Dear Prof. Yu: I am reporting on the above manuscript, which you recently submitted for consideration in Analytical Chemistry. After a careful study of the manuscript and considering the reviewers' comments, I regret to inform you that I have decided against publication. The potential usefulness of your work is not in question. However, in light of the reviewers' evaluation and comments, I do not believe that publication is justified. I hope you will find the reviewers' specific comments helpful in planning future work. These comments are either included here or, if they were given in the form of a file, will appear at the bottom of the copy of this letter which will appear and be stored in your Author Center. I appreciate the opportunity to have considered this contribution, and thank you for your interest in Analytical Chemistry. Kind regards, Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Should not be published in Analytical Chemistry. Comments: The authors reported a fluorescence turn-on method for the detection of Hg2+ based on the interaction of perylene probe and Au nanoparticles. In fact, the similar sensing strategies have been reported elsewhere, the paper itself lacks novelty. Moreover, the following questions should also be addressed. 1. In the introduction, the outstanding advantages of fluorescence assays compared with the reported methods are imprecise (Page 3, line 31-34). 2. In the manuscript, the authors state that the formation of the Au/Hg amalgam resulted in release of the probes. However, the probes should be added in the system after the formation of Au/Hg amalgam according to the Experimental Section and Scheme 1. 3. Some experiments and data should be supplemented. For example, the corresponding stability of the system, the corresponding concentrations should be noted in Figures for clearness, errors bars should be added in Fig. 5, and the experimental conditions for the detection of Hg2+ in lake water samples should be described in detail. 4. As for the selectivity, the authors only selected common divalent metal ions, other valent metal ions such as Ag+, Fe3+ should be performed. 5. The limit of detection (LOD) value of 5 nM was reported. How about the maximum residue limit of Hg2+ in drinking water as prescribed in Europe or USA? In addition, the authors should describe how the LOD was calculated. 6. For the real sample analysis, the sensors should be ultrasensitive, simple, rapid, and inexpensive. The chip sensor is a good choice, so the reported method could be further developed onto a chip sensor. Additional Questions: Significance: Moderate (not suitable for Analytical Chemistry) Originality: Moderate (not suitable for Analytical Chemistry) Broad Interest: Moderate (not suitable for Analytical Chemistry) Technical Quality: Moderate (not suitable for Analytical Chemistry) Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: Yes Are the references appropriate and correct?: In Part Is the English adequate?: In Part Is the quality of the figures sufficient?: In Part Are the data statistically significant with appropriate controls included?: In Part Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: May eventually be publishable, but requires major revisions as indicated. Comments: This manuscript reports a novel fluorescence turn-on strategy based on Au nanoparticles and a perylene probe for the sensing of Hg2+ ions. Although the mechanism behind the synthesis &detection are carefully studied and the results are clearly presented, this work need major revise to satisfy the requirement of publication in Anal. Chem. Please take into account the following comments: 1. The author stated that the fluorescence turn-on strategy to detect Hg2+ ions. Form the meaning of “turn-on”, we think that the fluorescence of perylene probe is first quenched by Au NPs. Then with increasing of Hg2+ ions, the fluorescence of the sensor was becoming more and more strong. But in the actual detection, the sensing of Hg2+ was performed in two separate progresses. How about the results when the experiment was performed in the continuous detection progress? 2. In the study of selectivity of the sensor, the author selected a few ions only in (Ⅱ), how about the interference when ions (Ⅰ&Ⅲ) present? Such as Ag+? Additional Questions: Significance: High (suitable for Analytical Chemistry) Originality: Moderate (not suitable for Analytical Chemistry) Broad Interest: Moderate (not suitable for Analytical Chemistry) Technical Quality: Moderate (not suitable for Analytical Chemistry) Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: In Part Are the references appropriate and correct?: Yes Is the English adequate?: Yes Is the quality of the figures sufficient?: In Part Are the data statistically significant with appropriate controls included?: In Part |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
0856求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有13人回復(fù)
-
0703化學(xué)
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
-
329求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
321求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
-
0856材料化工調(diào)劑 總分330
已經(jīng)有12人回復(fù)
-
309求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
070300化學(xué)354求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
330分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
299求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
-
一志愿北京理工大學(xué)本科211材料工程294求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)價(jià)值貼推薦，對(duì)您同樣有幫助:
- 投APPLIED INTELLIGENCE，大修后第二次被外行審稿人侮辱，編輯拒稿，氣死了！
已經(jīng)有12人回復(fù)
- sci審稿回復(fù)，兩個(gè)大修后接受，一個(gè)拒稿，這種情況怎么辦？
已經(jīng)有12人回復(fù)
- RSC ADV 拒稿申訴后，接到編輯回信
已經(jīng)有14人回復(fù)
- 審稿意見同意發(fā)表，但被編輯拒稿是什么問(wèn)題？
已經(jīng)有14人回復(fù)
- sci一個(gè)拒絕，一個(gè)推薦發(fā)表，編輯拒稿，是否申訴？？？
已經(jīng)有39人回復(fù)
- 一個(gè)審稿人建議小修，另一個(gè)審稿人拒稿，最后編輯拒稿，怎么辦？
已經(jīng)有15人回復(fù)
- 三個(gè)審稿人,一個(gè)直接拒掉,兩個(gè)要大修,各位看看還有戲沒?
已經(jīng)有15人回復(fù)
- 編輯給出大修意見，但是3個(gè)審稿人各只有一個(gè)意見，如何大修？
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
- 為什么審稿人意見是大修而被編輯拒了呢？
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
- 審稿人一個(gè)拒稿一個(gè)大修，編輯給大修，求助
已經(jīng)有26人回復(fù)
- 論文兩個(gè)審稿人讓小修，一個(gè)審稿人拒絕，結(jié)果編輯拒稿了，這種情況還有希望嗎？
已經(jīng)有41人回復(fù)
- 編輯直接拒稿想申訴
已經(jīng)有33人回復(fù)
- 投JMCC 一個(gè)審稿人拒稿，一個(gè)審稿人建議大修，然后就被編輯直接拒了，好傷心
已經(jīng)有32人回復(fù)
- 編輯拒稿，沒有給出明確理由，可以申訴嗎？
已經(jīng)有34人回復(fù)
- 論文大修，2審稿人，其中一個(gè)措辭很嚴(yán)肅，請(qǐng)大家看看編輯會(huì)怎么考慮？
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
- 大修后被編輯拒掉，重投會(huì)換審稿人嗎？
已經(jīng)有13人回復(fù)
- 一個(gè)拒稿，一個(gè)小修，這文章命運(yùn)如何？
已經(jīng)有30人回復(fù)
- 一個(gè)審稿人同意接受，一個(gè)審稿人大修，結(jié)果主編給拒了，該怎么辦
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
- 大修后返回修改稿，收到編輯一封信（附信件內(nèi)容），是準(zhǔn)備拒稿嗎？
已經(jīng)有17人回復(fù)
- 審稿人說(shuō)大修，但是論文被拒，給編輯再發(fā)郵件申訴有用嗎 7.19 更新
已經(jīng)有30人回復(fù)
- 有沒有兩個(gè)審稿人一個(gè)拒，一個(gè)大修，然后編輯reject但是可以resubmit
已經(jīng)有16人回復(fù)
- 拒稿重投的稿件到編輯那邊好長(zhǎng)時(shí)間了還沒給審稿人,怎么回事?
已經(jīng)有15人回復(fù)
雨夢(mèng)無(wú)聲
金蟲 (著名寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 451 (碩士)
- 金幣: 1686.1
- 散金: 8792
- 紅花: 41
- 帖子: 1728
- 在線: 744.5小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 1830549
- 注冊(cè): 2012-05-23
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 分析化學(xué)
8樓2015-01-08 23:33:50
2樓2015-01-08 15:43:23
感謝參與，應(yīng)助指數(shù) +1
|
本帖內(nèi)容被屏蔽 |
3樓2015-01-08 15:46:42
aboluo198331
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
- 應(yīng)助: 300 (大學(xué)生)
- 金幣: 24601.8
- 散金: 4197
- 紅花: 112
- 沙發(fā): 1
- 帖子: 22903
- 在線: 1194.5小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 1360294
- 注冊(cè): 2011-08-03
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 土壤學(xué)
4樓2015-01-08 15:56:29
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 070300化學(xué)354求調(diào)劑 +4 | 101次希望 2026-03-28 | 4/200 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
[考研] 289求調(diào)劑 +13 | 新時(shí)代材料 2026-03-27 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 0703 化學(xué) 求調(diào)劑，一志愿山東大學(xué) 342 分 +4 | Shern—- 2026-03-28 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +4 | wulanna 2026-03-28 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703一志愿9，初試成績(jī)：338，四六級(jí)已過(guò)，有科研經(jīng)歷，求調(diào)劑！ +4 | Zuhui0306 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工（0856）304求B區(qū)調(diào)劑 +8 | 邱gl 2026-03-27 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 291求調(diào)劑 +6 | HanBeiNingZC 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 359求調(diào)劑 +4 | 王了個(gè)楠 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 294分080500材料科學(xué)與工程求調(diào)劑 +4 | 柳溪邊 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +3 | 丹青奶蓋 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 281求調(diào)劑 +3 | 亞克西good 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿上海交大生物與醫(yī)藥專碩324分，求調(diào)劑 +6 | jiajunX 2026-03-22 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 303求調(diào)劑 +6 | 藍(lán)山月 2026-03-25 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 07化學(xué)303求調(diào)劑 +5 | 睿08 2026-03-25 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 332求調(diào)劑 +6 | 032500 2026-03-25 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 302求調(diào)劑 +4 | 錦衣衛(wèi)藤椒 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 282求調(diào)劑 +3 | wcq131415 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿北化315 求調(diào)劑 +3 | akrrain 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 341求調(diào)劑(一志愿湖南大學(xué)070300) +5 | 番茄頭--- 2026-03-22 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 361求調(diào)劑 +3 | Glack 2026-03-22 | 3/150 |
|