| 8 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1431 | 回復: 7 | ||
[求助]
求助給位前輩,看看我的文章接收的可能性
|
|
下面是編輯的回信: We now have referees' comments on the above paper. I am pleased to tell you that the work is of interest, but significant modifications are required in order to address the referees' comments, which are included below and in the attached file. In addition to the referees comments, I note that the list of references is far too short for a scholarly research article. Please ensure that you have referred to all relevant prior research before submitting a revised manuscript. 兩個審稿人,一個審稿人意見很好,但是另一個人給的意見很不好,有點默拒的意思,他應該沒太仔細看或者沒看懂,說我沒考慮什么什么,其實我是有的,估計他就因為這一點就說我文章不正確并且深度不夠,當然也就沒有什么修改意見了。 最后的狀態(tài)是return for major rewriting。所以想請問各位前輩,因為這樣的話comments就比較少,這種情況下怎么修改,接受的可能性大么?謝謝~在線等~~ |
至尊木蟲 (知名作家)
| 看到pleased我就覺得錄用幾率很大,好好改,comments比較少就多解釋,態(tài)度要好。 |

新蟲 (小有名氣)
送紅花一朵 |
謝謝前輩,下面是第二個人的審稿意見 The standard of written English is rather poor. There is insufficient depth to this paper and it is confined to rather simple analysis for the bending deformation of a beam. I would expect to see at least a Finite Element simulation to confirm whether the elastic-plastic analysis for the beam deformation is adequate. I also believe their analysis is incorrect. For example, if Figure 1 is a free body diagram of the forces applied during laser peening where are the reaction forces? 真是相當?shù)牟畎,是因為我英語寫的很差導致他看不懂?說我的分析錯誤,沒考慮reaction forcess明顯就是沒看懂或者沒看完。。。這是不是導致他這么差評價的原因?我總感覺我修改了這人也不會滿意。。。sigh! |
|
謝謝前輩,下面是第二個人的審稿意見 The standard of written English is rather poor. There is insufficient depth to this paper and it is confined to rather simple analysis for the bending deformation of a beam. I would expect to see at least a Finite Element simulation to confirm whether the elastic-plastic analysis for the beam deformation is adequate. I also believe their analysis is incorrect. For example, if Figure 1 is a free body diagram of the forces applied during laser peening where are the reaction forces? 真是相當?shù)牟畎,是因為我英語寫的很差導致他看不懂?說我的分析錯誤,沒考慮reaction forcess明顯就是沒看懂或者沒看完。。。這是不是導致他這么差評價的原因啊?我總感覺我修改了這人也不會滿意。。。sigh! |
鐵桿木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
|
本帖內(nèi)容被屏蔽 |
金蟲 (正式寫手)
| 8 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿985,本科211,0817化學工程與技術(shù)319求調(diào)劑 +6 | Liwangman 2026-03-15 | 6/300 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 286求調(diào)劑 +3 | lemonzzn 2026-03-16 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 化學工程321分求調(diào)劑 +14 | 大米飯! 2026-03-15 | 17/850 |
|
|
[考研] 281求調(diào)劑(0805) +4 | 煙汐憶海 2026-03-16 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 303求調(diào)劑 +4 | 睿08 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學調(diào)劑 +3 | 妮妮ninicgb 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學調(diào)劑 ,六級已過,有科研經(jīng)歷 +9 | 曦熙兮 2026-03-15 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 290求調(diào)劑 +3 | p asserby. 2026-03-15 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考博] 26申博 +4 | 八旬速覽 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
[論文投稿] 有沒有大佬發(fā)小論文能帶我個二作 +3 | 增銳漏人 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +3 | 淇ya_~ 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 267一志愿南京工業(yè)大學0817化工求調(diào)劑 +6 | SUICHILD 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 285求調(diào)劑 +6 | ytter 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 0856求調(diào)劑 +3 | 劉夢微 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工 323 英一+數(shù)二+物化,一志愿:哈工大 本人本科雙一流 +4 | 自由的_飛翔 2026-03-13 | 5/250 |
|
|
[碩博家園] 085600 260分求調(diào)劑 +3 | 天空還下雨么 2026-03-13 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +5 | 一定有學上- 2026-03-12 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工 309分請求調(diào)劑 +7 | dtdxzxx 2026-03-12 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 材料301分求調(diào)劑 +5 | Liyouyumairs 2026-03-12 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 333求調(diào)劑 +3 | 152697 2026-03-12 | 4/200 |
|