| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1447 | 回復: 7 | ||
| 當前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
求助給位前輩,看看我的文章接收的可能性
|
||
|
下面是編輯的回信: We now have referees' comments on the above paper. I am pleased to tell you that the work is of interest, but significant modifications are required in order to address the referees' comments, which are included below and in the attached file. In addition to the referees comments, I note that the list of references is far too short for a scholarly research article. Please ensure that you have referred to all relevant prior research before submitting a revised manuscript. 兩個審稿人,一個審稿人意見很好,但是另一個人給的意見很不好,有點默拒的意思,他應該沒太仔細看或者沒看懂,說我沒考慮什么什么,其實我是有的,估計他就因為這一點就說我文章不正確并且深度不夠,當然也就沒有什么修改意見了。 最后的狀態(tài)是return for major rewriting。所以想請問各位前輩,因為這樣的話comments就比較少,這種情況下怎么修改,接受的可能性大么?謝謝~在線等~~ |
新蟲 (小有名氣)
至尊木蟲 (知名作家)
| 看到pleased我就覺得錄用幾率很大,好好改,comments比較少就多解釋,態(tài)度要好。 |

送紅花一朵 |
謝謝前輩,下面是第二個人的審稿意見 The standard of written English is rather poor. There is insufficient depth to this paper and it is confined to rather simple analysis for the bending deformation of a beam. I would expect to see at least a Finite Element simulation to confirm whether the elastic-plastic analysis for the beam deformation is adequate. I also believe their analysis is incorrect. For example, if Figure 1 is a free body diagram of the forces applied during laser peening where are the reaction forces? 真是相當?shù)牟畎,是因為我英語寫的很差導致他看不懂?說我的分析錯誤,沒考慮reaction forcess明顯就是沒看懂或者沒看完。。。這是不是導致他這么差評價的原因?我總感覺我修改了這人也不會滿意。。。sigh! |
|
謝謝前輩,下面是第二個人的審稿意見 The standard of written English is rather poor. There is insufficient depth to this paper and it is confined to rather simple analysis for the bending deformation of a beam. I would expect to see at least a Finite Element simulation to confirm whether the elastic-plastic analysis for the beam deformation is adequate. I also believe their analysis is incorrect. For example, if Figure 1 is a free body diagram of the forces applied during laser peening where are the reaction forces? 真是相當?shù)牟畎,是因為我英語寫的很差導致他看不懂?說我的分析錯誤,沒考慮reaction forcess明顯就是沒看懂或者沒看完。。。這是不是導致他這么差評價的原因?我總感覺我修改了這人也不會滿意。。。sigh! |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿中南化學337求調(diào)劑 +4 | niko- 2026-03-19 | 5/250 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 281求調(diào)劑(0805) +12 | 煙汐憶海 2026-03-16 | 23/1150 |
|
|
[考研] 能源材料化學課題組招收碩士研究生8-10名 +5 | 脫穎而出 2026-03-16 | 14/700 |
|
|
[考研] 0856調(diào)劑,是學校就去 +7 | sllhht 2026-03-19 | 8/400 |
|
|
[論文投稿]
申請回稿延期一個月,編輯同意了。但系統(tǒng)上的時間沒變,給編輯又寫郵件了,沒回復
10+3
|
wangf9518 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料學碩318求調(diào)劑 +5 | February_Feb 2026-03-19 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿福大288有機化學,求調(diào)劑 +3 | 小木蟲200408204 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料考研調(diào)劑 +3 | xwt。 2026-03-19 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 346求調(diào)劑[0856] +3 | WayneLim327 2026-03-16 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿天大材料與化工(085600)總分338 +5 | 蔡大美女 2026-03-13 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 303求調(diào)劑 +4 | 睿08 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 301求調(diào)劑 +4 | A_JiXing 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +4 | 是Lupa啊 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 東南大學364求調(diào)劑 +5 | JasonYuiui 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 321求調(diào)劑 +5 | 大米飯! 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 0703 物理化學調(diào)劑 +3 | 我可以上岸的對?/a> 2026-03-13 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 0856求調(diào)劑 +3 | 劉夢微 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 22408總分284求調(diào)劑 +3 | InAspic 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 289求調(diào)劑 +4 | 這么名字咋樣 2026-03-14 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 復試調(diào)劑 +3 | 呼呼?~+123456 2026-03-14 | 3/150 |
|