 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 4/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 6340 | 回復(fù): 46 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
garden134鐵蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[交流]
投steel research international，3位審稿人兩位接收，一位拒稿，請(qǐng)大家?guī)兔Ψ治鲆幌?
|
||
|
如題，其中有兩位審稿人給了一些小修的意見建議接受，其中一位貌似給的評(píng)價(jià)還很高（說是提為VIP文章，具體是啥意思我也不太明白，詳見審稿意見），第三位提的意見比較尖銳，最后是要改投其他雜志，勞請(qǐng)大家看看幫忙分析一下編輯的意見和三位審稿人的意見，好緊張啊，謝謝啦。 Dear Dr. ***, Thank you for submitting your manuscript "****" to steel research international. The reviewer report and comments are included at the end of this email. On the basis of the reviewer comments, we are not able at this stage to accept your manuscript for publication. However, we believe that your manuscript may become acceptable for publication after major revisions, if you are able to address the reviewer comments and make the necessary revisions and improvements. The English should be improved. Please have your manuscript checked by a native English speaker before resubmitting your manuscript. To submit your revision, go to http://srin-journal.edmgr.com/ and log in as an Author using your username (********) and password. Your submission can be found under the menu item "Submissions Needing Revision". Please note that when you submit the revised version of this manuscript, you will be asked to upload a zip archive containing the production data that will be used if your manuscript is accepted. See below for more details. When you submit your revised manuscript, please include a point-by-point response to the reviewer comments in the "Respond to Reviewers" box, including a list of changes made and a rebuttal to any comments with which you disagree. All changes to your manuscript should also be highlighted in the main manuscript file. We should receive your revised manuscript by 27 Mar 2015. Please inform us if you anticipate you will need more time, as we may prefer to receive your manuscript as a new submission at a later date. When we receive your revised manuscript, its suitability for publication in steel research international will be reassessed. Yours sincerely, Sandra Kalveram P.S. If your manuscript is accepted, the revised version will be used to prepare the proofs. Please save the revised version of your manuscript using the Microsoft Word template on the journal homepage to expedite processing. Bitmap figures (e.g. photos, microscopy images) should be sent as individual Tiff files. Line art figures (e.g. plots, graphs, chemical structures, schemes) should be copied from the original application and pasted as a metafile into a Microsoft Word document by using "Edit... Paste Special... Picture (Windows metafile)". If your manuscript includes Supporting Information, please upload this as a separate file. Please also send an eye-catching color image and a short text (50-60 words) summarizing your article that could be used in the Table of Contents. ------------------------------- REVIEWER REPORT: ------------------------------- Please note that reviewers may not be numbered consecutively. EVALUATION: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Please rate the importance of this submission. Reviewer #1: Should be published in this journal Reviewer #2: Should be submitted elsewhere Reviewer #3: Should be published as a VIP paper - Top 10% of Submissions -------------------- Please rate the originality of this submission. Reviewer #1: Acceptable level of new results Reviewer #2: Insufficient level of new results Reviewer #3: Acceptable level of new results -------------------- Please rate the scientific and technical content of this submission. Reviewer #1: Minor inconsistencies or inaccuracies Reviewer #2: Major inconsistencies or inaccuracies Reviewer #3: Fully consistent and accurate -------------------- Please rate the length of this submission. Reviewer #1: Concise and correct length Reviewer #2: Contains unnecessary information Reviewer #3: Concise and correct length COMMENTS TO AUTHOR: Reviewer #1: In this manuscript, the authors investigated the Effect of bainitic packets size distribution on impact toughness and its scatter in the ductile-brittle transition temperature of Mn-Ni-Mo Q&T bainitic steels. This project provide a useful contribution to our understanding of cleavage fracture behaviors in DBTT region in the bainitic steels. This work is worthy to be published. However, several revisions should be made before the paper fully satisfies the publication standard. 1. In line 20, page 5, the authors presented that tempering is "to obtain the bainitic microstructure". It's wrong. 2. In line 31, page 8, The authors should give the determination means in detail for the values of scattering in the impact toughness (ZIT), austenite grain size (Za), bainitic packet size (Zp) and block size (Zb). 3. The English is needed to be improved. Reviewer #2: The authors tried to reveal the influence of bainitic packets size on impact toughness by measuring Charpy impact energy of samples with different microstructures. In the second part of the article, they managed to interpret their results by fitting the data on the basis of the Weibull distribution. Their primary conclusion is not novel and has appeared elsewhere, for instance, in Ref [35]. The main comments are detailed below: 1. Introduction should be condensed substantially as it is tedious. 2. The presentation is poor and numerous typos and grammar mistakes in English usage can be found throughout the paper, making it hard to follow. This referee recommends they seek professionals to proofread before submitting their paper if they will revise. For example, this referee cannot understand the following statement; "However, it may be lead to erroneous conclusions when extrapolate the toughness values due to the statistical analysis is not based on a physical model" in P4. 3. The bainitic packet size obviously differs from grain size in conventional metallurgical microstructure. How to define a bainitic packet size and how to measure should be very important, while the authors failed in giving more details. They showed two EBSD patterns, in which 4 packets are arbitrarily lined out without explanations. Actually, to accurately characterize the size and distribution of bainitic packet is rather imperative and fundamental for further proceeding, as stated in Ref [35]. 4. Their citation for Griffith equation (1) is misleading and the explanation of symbols, e.g., d should be criticized. The data gama (γ) from Ref [35] should be deliberated if the authors have ever read that article. As the authors failed to provide convincing evidence to support their claim in this paper, it does not merit publication in the scientific Journal in its present form. Reviewer #3: This article is very important to well understand and prevent the low temperature failure of high strength high strength low alloy bainitic steels. The service conditions of cryogenic pressure vessels are extremely harsh situations. High strength low alloy bainitic steels are widely used to produce the cryogenic pressure vessels. This article investigated the low temperature impact toughness of high strength low alloy bainitic steels. It is very important to well understand and prevent its failure at low temperature. The following corrections need to be done. 1)There some grammatical or spelling errors in this manuscript, such as "alloy" was spelled as "ally" in line 18 of Page 2, "might" was spelled as " mgith" in line 54 of Page 8, please carefully correct the whole manuscript especially in English. 2)In the section of Experimental, there are many descriptions about the tensile tests, but no results were given. 3)It is better to divide the Results and discussion into more sections to well guide reading and understanding the article. ----- Steel Research International Email: editor@steel-research.de Phone: +49 6201 606 581 http://www.steel-research.de/ ***** ***** Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA - A company of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. - Location of the Company: Weinheim - Trade Register: Mannheim, HRB 432833. Chairman of the Supervisory Board: Stephen Michael Smith. General Partner: John Wiley & Sons GmbH, Location: Weinheim - Trade Register Mannheim, HRB 432296 - Managing Director: Dr. Jon Walmsley ***** ***** |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
281求調(diào)劑（0805）
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
-
環(huán)境領(lǐng)域全國(guó)重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室招收博士1-2名
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
材料專碩306英一數(shù)二
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
-
301求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
一志愿天津大學(xué)化學(xué)工藝專業(yè)（081702）315分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
302求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
26博士申請(qǐng)
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
268求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
311求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
-
被我言中：新模板不強(qiáng)調(diào)格式了，假專家開始管格式了
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
| 祝福。。。。。。 |
36樓2015-02-26 08:33:51
|
本帖內(nèi)容被屏蔽 |
14樓2015-02-25 19:17:51
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考博] 26博士申請(qǐng) +3 | 1042136743 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
[基金申請(qǐng)] 被我言中：新模板不強(qiáng)調(diào)格式了，假專家開始管格式了 +4 | beefly 2026-03-14 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料，紡織，生物（0856、0710），化學(xué)招生啦 +3 | Eember. 2026-03-17 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 301求調(diào)劑 +4 | A_JiXing 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南京大學(xué)，080500材料科學(xué)與工程，調(diào)劑 +4 | Jy? 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 283求調(diào)劑 +3 | 聽風(fēng)就是雨； 2026-03-16 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿985，本科211，0817化學(xué)工程與技術(shù)319求調(diào)劑 +5 | Liwangman 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 070300化學(xué)學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑 +6 | 太想進(jìn)步了0608 2026-03-16 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求老師收留調(diào)劑 +4 | jiang姜66 2026-03-14 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 289求調(diào)劑 +4 | 這么名字咋樣 2026-03-14 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑 +3 | 5201314Lsy！ 2026-03-13 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +4 | 快樂的香蕉 2026-03-11 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +5 | 是Lupa啊 2026-03-11 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 336求調(diào)劑 +6 | Iuruoh 2026-03-11 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 333求調(diào)劑 +3 | 球球古力 2026-03-11 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +7 | 18880831720 2026-03-11 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 工科278分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 周慢熱啊 2026-03-12 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 工科材料085601 279求調(diào)劑 +8 | 困于星晨 2026-03-12 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿211化學(xué)學(xué)碩310分求調(diào)劑 +8 | 努力奮斗112 2026-03-12 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿山大07化學(xué) 332分 四六級(jí)已過 本科山東雙非 求調(diào)劑！ +3 | 不想理你 2026-03-12 | 3/150 |
|