 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 查看: 6335 | 回復(fù): 46 | |||
garden134鐵蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[交流]
投steel research international，3位審稿人兩位接收，一位拒稿，請(qǐng)大家?guī)兔Ψ治鲆幌?
|
||
|
如題，其中有兩位審稿人給了一些小修的意見建議接受，其中一位貌似給的評(píng)價(jià)還很高（說(shuō)是提為VIP文章，具體是啥意思我也不太明白，詳見審稿意見），第三位提的意見比較尖銳，最后是要改投其他雜志，勞請(qǐng)大家看看幫忙分析一下編輯的意見和三位審稿人的意見，好緊張啊，謝謝啦。 Dear Dr. ***, Thank you for submitting your manuscript "****" to steel research international. The reviewer report and comments are included at the end of this email. On the basis of the reviewer comments, we are not able at this stage to accept your manuscript for publication. However, we believe that your manuscript may become acceptable for publication after major revisions, if you are able to address the reviewer comments and make the necessary revisions and improvements. The English should be improved. Please have your manuscript checked by a native English speaker before resubmitting your manuscript. To submit your revision, go to http://srin-journal.edmgr.com/ and log in as an Author using your username (********) and password. Your submission can be found under the menu item "Submissions Needing Revision". Please note that when you submit the revised version of this manuscript, you will be asked to upload a zip archive containing the production data that will be used if your manuscript is accepted. See below for more details. When you submit your revised manuscript, please include a point-by-point response to the reviewer comments in the "Respond to Reviewers" box, including a list of changes made and a rebuttal to any comments with which you disagree. All changes to your manuscript should also be highlighted in the main manuscript file. We should receive your revised manuscript by 27 Mar 2015. Please inform us if you anticipate you will need more time, as we may prefer to receive your manuscript as a new submission at a later date. When we receive your revised manuscript, its suitability for publication in steel research international will be reassessed. Yours sincerely, Sandra Kalveram P.S. If your manuscript is accepted, the revised version will be used to prepare the proofs. Please save the revised version of your manuscript using the Microsoft Word template on the journal homepage to expedite processing. Bitmap figures (e.g. photos, microscopy images) should be sent as individual Tiff files. Line art figures (e.g. plots, graphs, chemical structures, schemes) should be copied from the original application and pasted as a metafile into a Microsoft Word document by using "Edit... Paste Special... Picture (Windows metafile)". If your manuscript includes Supporting Information, please upload this as a separate file. Please also send an eye-catching color image and a short text (50-60 words) summarizing your article that could be used in the Table of Contents. ------------------------------- REVIEWER REPORT: ------------------------------- Please note that reviewers may not be numbered consecutively. EVALUATION: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Please rate the importance of this submission. Reviewer #1: Should be published in this journal Reviewer #2: Should be submitted elsewhere Reviewer #3: Should be published as a VIP paper - Top 10% of Submissions -------------------- Please rate the originality of this submission. Reviewer #1: Acceptable level of new results Reviewer #2: Insufficient level of new results Reviewer #3: Acceptable level of new results -------------------- Please rate the scientific and technical content of this submission. Reviewer #1: Minor inconsistencies or inaccuracies Reviewer #2: Major inconsistencies or inaccuracies Reviewer #3: Fully consistent and accurate -------------------- Please rate the length of this submission. Reviewer #1: Concise and correct length Reviewer #2: Contains unnecessary information Reviewer #3: Concise and correct length COMMENTS TO AUTHOR: Reviewer #1: In this manuscript, the authors investigated the Effect of bainitic packets size distribution on impact toughness and its scatter in the ductile-brittle transition temperature of Mn-Ni-Mo Q&T bainitic steels. This project provide a useful contribution to our understanding of cleavage fracture behaviors in DBTT region in the bainitic steels. This work is worthy to be published. However, several revisions should be made before the paper fully satisfies the publication standard. 1. In line 20, page 5, the authors presented that tempering is "to obtain the bainitic microstructure". It's wrong. 2. In line 31, page 8, The authors should give the determination means in detail for the values of scattering in the impact toughness (ZIT), austenite grain size (Za), bainitic packet size (Zp) and block size (Zb). 3. The English is needed to be improved. Reviewer #2: The authors tried to reveal the influence of bainitic packets size on impact toughness by measuring Charpy impact energy of samples with different microstructures. In the second part of the article, they managed to interpret their results by fitting the data on the basis of the Weibull distribution. Their primary conclusion is not novel and has appeared elsewhere, for instance, in Ref [35]. The main comments are detailed below: 1. Introduction should be condensed substantially as it is tedious. 2. The presentation is poor and numerous typos and grammar mistakes in English usage can be found throughout the paper, making it hard to follow. This referee recommends they seek professionals to proofread before submitting their paper if they will revise. For example, this referee cannot understand the following statement; "However, it may be lead to erroneous conclusions when extrapolate the toughness values due to the statistical analysis is not based on a physical model" in P4. 3. The bainitic packet size obviously differs from grain size in conventional metallurgical microstructure. How to define a bainitic packet size and how to measure should be very important, while the authors failed in giving more details. They showed two EBSD patterns, in which 4 packets are arbitrarily lined out without explanations. Actually, to accurately characterize the size and distribution of bainitic packet is rather imperative and fundamental for further proceeding, as stated in Ref [35]. 4. Their citation for Griffith equation (1) is misleading and the explanation of symbols, e.g., d should be criticized. The data gama (γ) from Ref [35] should be deliberated if the authors have ever read that article. As the authors failed to provide convincing evidence to support their claim in this paper, it does not merit publication in the scientific Journal in its present form. Reviewer #3: This article is very important to well understand and prevent the low temperature failure of high strength high strength low alloy bainitic steels. The service conditions of cryogenic pressure vessels are extremely harsh situations. High strength low alloy bainitic steels are widely used to produce the cryogenic pressure vessels. This article investigated the low temperature impact toughness of high strength low alloy bainitic steels. It is very important to well understand and prevent its failure at low temperature. The following corrections need to be done. 1)There some grammatical or spelling errors in this manuscript, such as "alloy" was spelled as "ally" in line 18 of Page 2, "might" was spelled as " mgith" in line 54 of Page 8, please carefully correct the whole manuscript especially in English. 2)In the section of Experimental, there are many descriptions about the tensile tests, but no results were given. 3)It is better to divide the Results and discussion into more sections to well guide reading and understanding the article. ----- Steel Research International Email: editor@steel-research.de Phone: +49 6201 606 581 http://www.steel-research.de/ ***** ***** Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA - A company of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. - Location of the Company: Weinheim - Trade Register: Mannheim, HRB 432833. Chairman of the Supervisory Board: Stephen Michael Smith. General Partner: John Wiley & Sons GmbH, Location: Weinheim - Trade Register Mannheim, HRB 432296 - Managing Director: Dr. Jon Walmsley ***** ***** |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
293求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有12人回復(fù)
-
070300化學(xué)319求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
268求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
-
301求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
0703化學(xué)336分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
301求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
材料專碩306英一數(shù)二
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
-
304求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
-
材料工程專碩調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
344求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)價(jià)值貼推薦，對(duì)您同樣有幫助:
- sci審稿回復(fù)，兩個(gè)大修后接受，一個(gè)拒稿，這種情況怎么辦？
已經(jīng)有12人回復(fù)
- 第一投被拒如果改投影響因子低的雜志，會(huì)遇到相同的審稿人嗎
已經(jīng)有40人回復(fù)
- 投稿AEM沒有推薦審稿人，看到審稿意見無(wú)語(yǔ)了！
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
- SCI投稿過(guò)程總結(jié)
已經(jīng)有124人回復(fù)
- 審稿人意見不統(tǒng)一 編輯一般會(huì)怎么處理
已經(jīng)有12人回復(fù)
- 一個(gè)審稿人建議小修，另一個(gè)審稿人拒稿，最后編輯拒稿，怎么辦？
已經(jīng)有15人回復(fù)
- international polymer processing 投稿，需要推薦三個(gè)審稿人，求助大神們
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
- 申請(qǐng)回避某審稿人模板
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
- 審稿人一個(gè)拒稿一個(gè)大修，編輯給大修，求助
已經(jīng)有26人回復(fù)
- 投INTERMETALLICS已接收，審稿的時(shí)候有兩個(gè)審稿人的意見，為什么接收的時(shí)候就一個(gè)啊？
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
- 本人第一篇SCI文章，求如何回復(fù)審稿人的意見
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- SSCI大修后再送另一審稿人被拒，請(qǐng)大家?guī)涂匆幌乱庖?/a>
已經(jīng)有32人回復(fù)
- 投JMCC 一個(gè)審稿人拒稿，一個(gè)審稿人建議大修，然后就被編輯直接拒了，好傷心
已經(jīng)有32人回復(fù)
- SCI投稿 第三審稿人
已經(jīng)有40人回復(fù)
- 被拒稿了的審稿人的意見是不是修改時(shí)候不用response啊？
已經(jīng)有27人回復(fù)
- 審稿人拒絕，主編給了一線希望
已經(jīng)有24人回復(fù)
- Food chemistry 和 Food research international
已經(jīng)有14人回復(fù)
- IMechE Part C三個(gè)專家兩個(gè)推薦發(fā)表，一個(gè)建議拒稿，成功概率幾何？
已經(jīng)有29人回復(fù)
- International Journal of Thermal Sciences,4個(gè)審稿人，3個(gè)修改后接收，1個(gè)拒
已經(jīng)有19人回復(fù)
- 3個(gè)審稿人，2個(gè)同意錄用，1個(gè)審稿人始終拒稿，結(jié)果會(huì)如何？
已經(jīng)有74人回復(fù)
- [求助] sci論文revise, 其中一個(gè)拒稿的審稿人意見該如何回復(fù)？
已經(jīng)有14人回復(fù)
- 投稿時(shí)要填寫作者，文章里的作者全都些寫上嗎？要天一個(gè)審稿人，怎么填�。�
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
james-james
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
- 應(yīng)助: 633 (博士)
- 金幣: 39389.2
- 紅花: 117
- 沙發(fā): 17
- 帖子: 28281
- 在線: 2475.9小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 1446532
- 注冊(cè): 2011-10-17
- 專業(yè): 藥物化學(xué)
garden13417樓2015-02-25 19:30:23
★
garden134(金幣+1): 謝謝參與
garden134(金幣+1): 謝謝參與
 |
2樓2015-02-25 18:46:23
★
garden134(金幣+1): 謝謝參與
garden134(金幣+1): 謝謝參與
 |
3樓2015-02-25 18:56:10
★
garden134(金幣+1): 謝謝參與
garden134(金幣+1): 謝謝參與
|
|
4樓2015-02-25 18:57:42
★
garden134(金幣+1): 謝謝參與
garden134(金幣+1): 謝謝參與
 本帖僅樓主可見 |
5樓2015-02-25 18:59:24
★
garden134(金幣+1): 謝謝參與
garden134(金幣+1): 謝謝參與
| 祝福 |
6樓2015-02-25 18:59:34
★
garden134(金幣+1): 謝謝參與
garden134(金幣+1): 謝謝參與
| 祝福 |
7樓2015-02-25 19:00:09
★
garden134(金幣+1): 謝謝參與
garden134(金幣+1): 謝謝參與
| 祝福祝福發(fā)祝福 |
8樓2015-02-25 19:00:27
★
garden134(金幣+1): 謝謝參與
garden134(金幣+1): 謝謝參與
|
|
9樓2015-02-25 19:00:53
★
garden134(金幣+1): 謝謝參與
garden134(金幣+1): 謝謝參與
|
|
10樓2015-02-25 19:01:05
相關(guān)版塊跳轉(zhuǎn)
我要訂閱樓主 garden134 的主題更新
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)336分求調(diào)劑 +4 | zbzihdhd 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 341求調(diào)劑 +5 | 搗蛋豬豬 2026-03-11 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0854可跨調(diào)劑，一作一項(xiàng)核心論文五項(xiàng)專利，省、國(guó)級(jí)證書40+數(shù)一英一287 +3 | 小李0854 2026-03-16 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[碩博家園] 深圳大學(xué)碩士招生（2026秋，傳感器方向，僅錄取第一志愿） +4 | xujiaoszu 2026-03-11 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 東南大學(xué)364求調(diào)劑 +5 | JasonYuiui 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 070300化學(xué)學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑 +6 | 太想進(jìn)步了0608 2026-03-16 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085600調(diào)劑 +5 | 漾漾123sun 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 327求調(diào)劑 +6 | 拾光任染 2026-03-15 | 11/550 |
|
|
|
[考研] 22408總分284求調(diào)劑 +3 | InAspic 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 070305求調(diào)劑 +3 | mlpqaz03 2026-03-14 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 288求調(diào)劑 +4 | 奇點(diǎn)0314 2026-03-14 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 331求調(diào)劑（0703有機(jī)化學(xué) +5 | ZY-05 2026-03-13 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 266求調(diào)劑 +4 | 學(xué)員97LZgn 2026-03-13 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +6 | Mochaaaa 2026-03-12 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 333求調(diào)劑 +3 | 球球古力 2026-03-11 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 301求調(diào)劑 +6 | Liyouyumairs 2026-03-11 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +7 | 綠豆芹菜湯 2026-03-12 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 307求調(diào)劑 +5 | 超級(jí)伊昂大王 2026-03-12 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 277求調(diào)劑 +4 | anchor17 2026-03-12 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 化工學(xué)碩306求調(diào)劑 +9 | 42838695 2026-03-12 | 9/450 |
|