| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 6930 | 回復: 18 | |||||
| 當前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||||
[交流]
大修被編輯秒拒,已經(jīng)按照審稿人的意見認真修改了,是否應該申訴? 已有17人參與
|
|||||
|
LZ之前投STARCH,一個月以后回來的意見是大修,三個審稿人的意見都不多,一個是認為要further discuss, 一個說interesting,沒提意見,還有一個說要minor revision. Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author Why not use the Statistica program for analysis of resulados? Figure 1 only shows the results before the microwave treatment. Where are the results after the microwave treatment? The results were not enough compared to the results in the literature. It is necessary to further discussion. Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author This article addresses factors commenting relationship between radical generation and microwave irradiation for various types of rice flour. The subject is not a new but analysis is interesting and within the scope of the Starch Journal. Reviewer: 3 Comments to the Author Dear Editor, The manuscript has been reviewed precisely. The hidden hazards of Microwave are since several years in the centre of interest. Therefore efforts to proving the truth are welcome. The study has been designed thoughtful and contains some useful data, thus this article is deserved to be published in STARCH after minor corrections. The followings must be taken into consideration: - Radical generation mechanism as well as radical generation and losses kinetics must be included in text. LZ按照審稿人的意見補了實驗,補充了discussion,還用SPSS處理了數(shù)據(jù),害怕時間拖太長,三周后就提交了修改稿和response letter.然而提交以后兩天內(nèi)就收到了編輯的拒信,理由只有一句話,而且完全沒有審稿人的意見。 Dear Author(s), I regret to inform you that your manuscript star.201500106.R1 has not been accepted for publication in Starch. The English and content of this paper has not been improved sufficiently for publication and therefore is rejected. Please note that this decision is final. Where review/further review was sought for the decision, the reviewers' comments are included at the end of this letter. Hopefully this will not deter you from making new submissions in the future. Yours faithfully, Prof. Richard Tester Editor Referee(s)' Comments to Author: 看到拒信頓時心涼了半截,辛辛苦苦修改的文章就這么莫名其妙被拒了。實在是想不明白。導師也很氣憤,建議我給編輯發(fā)郵件詢問原因,說明自己已經(jīng)認真修改的情況。求助大家,請問發(fā)這封郵件有必要嗎?如有必要,需要怎么說呢? 現(xiàn)在真的很絕望,希望能得到大家的意見,謝謝大家~ |
論文投稿交流的收集 | 投稿 |
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
金蟲 (小有名氣)
新蟲 (正式寫手)

金蟲 (著名寫手)

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +11 | 冬十三 2026-03-15 | 12/600 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 297求調(diào)劑 +8 | 戲精丹丹丹 2026-03-17 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +12 | 小熊joy 2026-03-14 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工求調(diào)劑 +6 | 為學666 2026-03-16 | 6/300 |
|
|
[碩博家園] 湖北工業(yè)大學 生命科學與健康學院-課題組招收2026級食品/生物方向碩士 +3 | 1喜春8 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 293求調(diào)劑 +6 | 世界首富 2026-03-11 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑,總分315,考的生物醫(yī)藥,一志愿湖南師范大學。調(diào)劑到任何專業(yè)都可以 +4 | 小丁想進步 2026-03-11 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 275求調(diào)劑 +4 | 太陽花天天開心 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 267一志愿南京工業(yè)大學0817化工求調(diào)劑 +6 | SUICHILD 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 283求調(diào)劑 +3 | 聽風就是雨; 2026-03-16 | 3/150 |
|
|
[基金申請]
今年的國基金是打分制嗎?
50+3
|
zhanghaozhu 2026-03-14 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0703一志愿211 285分求調(diào)劑 +5 | ly3471z 2026-03-13 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 中科院材料273求調(diào)劑 +4 | yzydy 2026-03-15 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 277材料科學與工程080500求調(diào)劑 +3 | 自由煎餅果子 2026-03-16 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 327求調(diào)劑 +6 | 拾光任染 2026-03-15 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 22408總分284求調(diào)劑 +3 | InAspic 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 070305求調(diào)劑 +3 | mlpqaz03 2026-03-14 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 255求調(diào)劑 +3 | 李嘉慧, 2026-03-12 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 281求調(diào)劑 +9 | Koxui 2026-03-12 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 材料專碩350 求調(diào)劑 +4 | 王金科 2026-03-12 | 4/200 |
|