| 4 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 732 | 回復(fù): 3 | |||
| 【有獎(jiǎng)交流】積極回復(fù)本帖子,參與交流,就有機(jī)會(huì)分得作者 328838485 的 30 個(gè)金幣 | |||
328838485鐵桿木蟲 (著名寫手)
水博士
|
[交流]
請問遇到這種主編怎么辦?申述重投還是改投呢?
|
||
|
請問遇到這種主編怎么辦?申述重投還是改投呢? Dear xx, Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that they object against publication as the language use is not appropriate. Therefore, I must reject the paper at this stage. For your guidance, I append the reviewers' comments below. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: The paper describes the use of a UF-system to concentrate different types of milk for cheese and yogurt production. It is a comprehensive body of work and the aper contains a large body of valuable information pertaining to membrane selection as well as operating conditions for the rotating disk system. My first and foremost objection is that the aper will have to be subjected to a serious grammatical scrutiny as the style and grammar are certainly not of the standard one would find acceptable for the Journal of membrane Science. I did a number of corrections in the introduction to illustrate my point, but the whole paper needs to be edited. The figures are clear and well presented, but in some instances very difficult to follow. I made some comments on the manuscript. The authors mentioned that all experiments were carried out in triplicate. If this was indeed done, the statistics for each datapoint should be shown in the form of an error bar, mentioning ±SED or SEM. In addition the significance of so-called "different" values obtained could the be calculated and displayed. As an example for the data in Figure 4 the authors reported "...After hot water rinsing, PES20 (22%) and UP005P (20%) had similar MPR values and P010P (15%) was still lowest,...." Were these data points the average of three determinations in three separate experiments or the average of three samples from the same experiment and were these differences statistically significant? This question could be posed for most of the data presented. The Conclusion of the paper is also rather blunt and repeats what was done without really indicating any advantages or significant features of the process. |

木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
銀蟲 (小有名氣)
|
按照審稿人的建議修改后再找人幫忙修改一下語言問題吧 發(fā)自小木蟲Android客戶端 |
| 4 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料277求調(diào)劑 +3 | min3 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 286求調(diào)劑 +11 | Faune 2026-03-21 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 一志愿 本科 北科大 化學(xué) 343 +4 | 13831862839 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 生物學(xué)學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑 +7 | 小羊睡著了? 2026-03-23 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 【考研調(diào)劑】化學(xué)專業(yè) 281分,一志愿四川大學(xué),誠心求調(diào)劑 +15 | 吃吃吃才有意義 2026-03-19 | 16/800 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿北化315 求調(diào)劑 +3 | akrrain 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考博] 申博26年 +4 | 八6八68 2026-03-19 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 335分 | 材料與化工專碩 | GPA 4.07 | 有科研經(jīng)歷 +4 | cccchenso 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南京理工大學(xué)085701資源與環(huán)境302分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 葵梓衛(wèi)隊(duì) 2026-03-18 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 291求調(diào)劑 +5 | 孅華 2026-03-22 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華中農(nóng)業(yè)071010,總分320求調(diào)劑 +5 | 困困困困坤坤 2026-03-20 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中南化學(xué)(0703)總分337求調(diào)劑 +9 | niko- 2026-03-19 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +3 | 26研0 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 269專碩求調(diào)劑 +6 | 金恩貝 2026-03-21 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +4 | 要好好無聊 2026-03-21 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +3 | 13341 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 279求調(diào)劑 +5 | 紅衣隱官 2026-03-21 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 321求調(diào)劑 +9 | 何潤采123 2026-03-18 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑求學(xué)校推薦 +3 | 伯樂29 2026-03-18 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿武漢理工材料工程專碩調(diào)劑 +9 | Doleres 2026-03-19 | 9/450 |
|