| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 736 | 回復(fù): 3 | |||
| 【有獎交流】積極回復(fù)本帖子,參與交流,就有機會分得作者 328838485 的 30 個金幣 | |||
| 當前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
請問遇到這種主編怎么辦?申述重投還是改投呢?
|
|||
|
請問遇到這種主編怎么辦?申述重投還是改投呢? Dear xx, Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that they object against publication as the language use is not appropriate. Therefore, I must reject the paper at this stage. For your guidance, I append the reviewers' comments below. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: The paper describes the use of a UF-system to concentrate different types of milk for cheese and yogurt production. It is a comprehensive body of work and the aper contains a large body of valuable information pertaining to membrane selection as well as operating conditions for the rotating disk system. My first and foremost objection is that the aper will have to be subjected to a serious grammatical scrutiny as the style and grammar are certainly not of the standard one would find acceptable for the Journal of membrane Science. I did a number of corrections in the introduction to illustrate my point, but the whole paper needs to be edited. The figures are clear and well presented, but in some instances very difficult to follow. I made some comments on the manuscript. The authors mentioned that all experiments were carried out in triplicate. If this was indeed done, the statistics for each datapoint should be shown in the form of an error bar, mentioning ±SED or SEM. In addition the significance of so-called "different" values obtained could the be calculated and displayed. As an example for the data in Figure 4 the authors reported "...After hot water rinsing, PES20 (22%) and UP005P (20%) had similar MPR values and P010P (15%) was still lowest,...." Were these data points the average of three determinations in three separate experiments or the average of three samples from the same experiment and were these differences statistically significant? This question could be posed for most of the data presented. The Conclusion of the paper is also rather blunt and repeats what was done without really indicating any advantages or significant features of the process. |

銀蟲 (小有名氣)
|
按照審稿人的建議修改后再找人幫忙修改一下語言問題吧 發(fā)自小木蟲Android客戶端 |
木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 352分 化工與材料 +5 | 海納百川Ly 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0856材料化工調(diào)劑 總分330 +10 | zhubinhao 2026-03-27 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 286求調(diào)劑 +3 | 丟掉懶惰 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 295材料工程專碩求調(diào)劑 +5 | 1428151015 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 316求調(diào)劑 +5 | Pigcasso 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 312求調(diào)劑 +9 | 上岸吧ZJY 2026-03-22 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑323材料與化工 +7 | 1124361 2026-03-24 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 276求調(diào)劑。有半年電池和半年高分子實習經(jīng)歷 +10 | 材料學(xué)257求調(diào)劑 2026-03-23 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 329求調(diào)劑 +7 | 鈕恩雪 2026-03-25 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華理,數(shù)一英一285求A區(qū)調(diào)劑 +8 | AZMK 2026-03-25 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +3 | 丹青奶蓋 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工304求B區(qū)調(diào)劑 +3 | 邱gl 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 07化學(xué)303求調(diào)劑 +5 | 睿08 2026-03-25 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 0854AI CV方向招收調(diào)劑 +4 | 章小魚567 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南航材料專317分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 炸呀炸呀炸薯條 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 080500求調(diào)劑 +3 | zzzzfan 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 344求調(diào)劑 +3 | desto 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
[論文投稿] 急發(fā)核心期刊論文 +3 | 賢達問津 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +4 | 妮妮ninicgb 2026-03-21 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +3 | .m.. 2026-03-21 | 4/200 |
|