 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 3862 | 回復(fù): 5 | ||
| 【懸賞金幣】回答本帖問題，作者smallmice將贈(zèng)送您 5 個(gè)金幣 | ||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
投了ICL給了rejected-and-resubmission allowed的意見，求助大牛們怎么看 已有2人參與
|
||
|
編輯意見是這樣的 The review of the referenced manuscript, CL2015-2386, is now complete. I regret to inform you that based on the enclosed reviews and my own reading of your manuscript, I am unable to recommend its publication in IEEE Communications Letters. You may revise and resubmit your manuscript to IEEE Communications Letters. When you do so, please include a cover letter that indicates the new submission is a revision of an earlier manuscript and the reference number of that prior manuscript. Also include as a supporting document a point-by-point response to the comments of the reviewers and the editor. The responses to comments file must be uploaded in PDF format in the same section in your submission as the body of your paper in ScholarOne Manuscripts, and not under the cover letter. Please also be aware that ALL submissions to IEEE Communications letters must complete the Electronic Copyright Process. If you decide to resubmit your manuscript you should complete the resubmission through the Manuscript Central. Click on "Manuscripts with Decisions" under My Manuscripts on the left side of your Author Dashboard and then click on "Create a Resubmission" under the Actions Column next to your manuscript. Your resubmission will be due within 75 days and is due on 14-Feb-2016. Please ensure that your revision is submitted in a timely manner as the webbased system will not allow a revision to enter the system after 75 days have elapsed. Please be aware that the time at which your revision permission will expire is 11:59 PM EST on the 75th day. Note, that according to the IEEE COMML policy, the maximum number of permitted resubmissions after a Reject-Resubmission Allowed decision is one (1) and the maximum number of permitted Minor Revisions is (2). Additional comments include: The paper was evaluated by three independent reviewers who pointed out several issues to be addressed and/or clarified. The authors should revise the paper accordingly in a possible resubmission. Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author IEEE Communications Letters In theory, this Letter gives a good solution to the resource allocation problem usually occurred in the context of cognitive multi-pair relaying transmission, by use of a similar optimisation strategy to those widely used for sub-carrier allocation in multi-user ODFM context (although the cost function varies). In practice, however, how to find a so-called "central controller, which collects all the required information", as claimed by the authors at the end of Section II? Especially, in a large cognitive networks with mobile users, how can a central controller (even if it exists like a genius), how can it determine which users should be grouped to jointly perform Tx power allocation? Similarly, which relays should be chosen as a potential group used to serve the aforementioned users? With such regards, the reviewer does not believe that such a central resource allocation strategy is of any practical interest in real wireless systems. Instead, some distributed strategies are more promising. On the other hand, to better demonstrate the necessity of such complex resource-allocation operations, could the authors compare the end-to-end performance, e.g., in terms of sum date rate of secondary transmission, between the proposed transmission scheme and the simplest scheme with fixed power allocation and random relay selection? Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author In this article, the authors investigate the resource optimization problem for the multi-user multi-relay decode-forward (DF) cognitive radio networks. The reviewer has the following concerns: 1)The authors should include the structure of the document. 2)The reviewer thinks that it would be important to explain the reason why these parameters results were chosen. Also, the authors should include references of articles that consider the discrete particle swarm optimization (DPSO) algorithm and the traditional water-filling (TWF) algorithm in cognitive radio. 3)The authors should explain better the metric bandwidthpower product (BPP). How the use of this metric improves the spectrum efficiency? 4)The authors created so much variables, it is hard to follow the sequence through the paper. The authors should review all the text and try to write the article with the minimum of variables. For instance, the authors use R^{n}_{m,k}, c_m, c for the transmission rate.、 5)The authors should explain better the arrangement of the nodes in the network. It is hard to see the localization of the nodes with a expression as "3+0.2×rand[0, 1]". 6)What is the value of R_{max} in the numerical results? 7)Are the parameters of the numerical results normalized? What is the unit of the metric bandwidthpower product (BPP)? Is the rate requirement c in bpcu or bps? 8)How is the results for a scenario where the primary receivers accept a great quantity of interference? For instance with I_{th} = 15 dB. 9) The equation (11) must be rewritten, because for c different of one, the supposition is not valid. The authors should write the variable w_{m,k} as (P_{sm}+P_k)/((2^c- 1)sigma^2), so the equation is valid independently of sigma and c. Reviewer: 3 Comments to the Author The authors applied bandwidth-power product as a metric of optimization and use joint optimal relay matching and greedy resource allocation (JRMRA) algorithm as a solution. I am not sure about the novelty of the proposed optimization and the proposed solution. In general the paper is well written and helps the researcher in this field. I did some search and I found the following paper, [R1] at the bottom, which is very close to this work, however the authors did not clarify their novelty to this work in the introduction section. In some parts it is a straightforward extension to [R1] Also I have found the following paper, [R2], also the authors did shoe their contribution over it. In general the paper is well written and helps the researcher in this field. 總體來說，第一個(gè)reviewer意見太犀利，第二個(gè)提的是細(xì)節(jié)性東西比較好回答，第三個(gè)對(duì)創(chuàng)新性提出了質(zhì)疑，各位大牛們覺得有沒有重投的必要 |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
275求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
招08考數(shù)學(xué)
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
303求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
306求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
考研調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
285求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
一志愿北京化工大學(xué)070300 學(xué)碩336求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
318求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
zbconquer
木蟲 (正式寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 77 (初中生)
- 金幣: 1901.1
- 散金: 1105
- 紅花: 25
- 帖子: 843
- 在線: 411.7小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 693619
- 注冊: 2009-01-16
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 通信理論與系統(tǒng)
3樓2015-12-04 00:51:57
ise_support 
捐助貴賓 (小有名氣)
- 應(yīng)助: 19 (小學(xué)生)
- 金幣: 296.3
- 散金: 3120
- 紅花: 13
- 帖子: 194
- 在線: 217.1小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 3151708
- 注冊: 2014-04-21
- 專業(yè): 外國語言
|
2點(diǎn)拙見 1，這篇文章已經(jīng)不能重投，這個(gè)期刊已經(jīng)拒稿。只能改投。 2，這個(gè)期刊建議改投的期刊出版的應(yīng)該是letter形式，作者是否能接受？能的話，按照審稿意見修改后可以改投。 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
2樓2015-12-03 22:15:33
4樓2015-12-04 08:51:19
5樓2015-12-04 08:51:40
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿北京化工大學(xué)070300 學(xué)碩336求調(diào)劑 +4 | vv迷 2026-03-21 | 7/350 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考博] 招收博士1-2人 +3 | QGZDSYS 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[基金申請] 山東省面上項(xiàng)目限額評(píng)審 +4 | 石瑞0426 2026-03-19 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[基金申請]
學(xué)校已經(jīng)提交到NSFC，還能修改嗎？
 40+4
|
babangida 2026-03-19 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0805材料320求調(diào)劑 +3 | 深海物語 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料工程（專）一志愿985 初試335求調(diào)劑 +3 | hiloiy 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿武理材料305分求調(diào)劑 +6 | 想上岸的鯉魚 2026-03-18 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +5 | 冬十三 2026-03-18 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +3 | 阿姐阿姐家啊 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中海洋材料工程專碩330分求調(diào)劑 +8 | 小材化本科 2026-03-18 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 287求調(diào)劑 +7 | 晨昏線與星海 2026-03-19 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研]
 材料與化工 322求調(diào)劑
+4
|
然11 2026-03-19 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 中南大學(xué)化學(xué)學(xué)碩337求調(diào)劑 +3 | niko- 2026-03-19 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研]
 295復(fù)試調(diào)劑
+8
|
簡木ChuFront 2026-03-19 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 295材料求調(diào)劑，一志愿武漢理工085601專碩 +5 | Charlieyq 2026-03-19 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[論文投稿]
申請回稿延期一個(gè)月，編輯同意了。但系統(tǒng)上的時(shí)間沒變，給編輯又寫郵件了，沒回復(fù)
10+3
|
wangf9518 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中國海洋大學(xué)，生物學(xué)，301分，求調(diào)劑 +5 | 1孫悟空 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工求調(diào)劑 +6 | 緒幸與子 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研]
0854，計(jì)算機(jī)類招收調(diào)劑
+3
|
胡辣湯放糖 2026-03-15 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 有沒有道鐵/土木的想調(diào)劑南林，給自己招師弟中～ +3 | TqlXswl 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|