 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 查看: 6399 | 回復(fù): 58 | ||
| 【獎勵】 本帖被評價46次，作者xdz1978增加金幣 29.6 個 | ||
[資源]
基金不中的蟲子，我們還需要苦練內(nèi)功啊，發(fā)一個秘籍，希望對大家有用
|
||
|
天天提心吊膽地等消息，不如苦練內(nèi)功，自身強大了，機會就多了！ 老美的Ten Simple Rules for Getting Grants，對我們也有一定啟發(fā)作用 如果覺得有用，別忘了給個評價 納米盤下載地址：http://d.namipan.com/d/f0bc3ece1 ... 3b05069243500740000 |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
085700資源與環(huán)境308求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
265求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
279分求調(diào)劑 一志愿211
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
一志愿吉林大學(xué)材料學(xué)碩321求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有12人回復(fù)
-
286分人工智能專業(yè)請求調(diào)劑愿意跨考！
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
329求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
申請回稿延期一個月，編輯同意了。但系統(tǒng)上的時間沒變，給編輯又寫郵件了，沒回復(fù)
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
材料學(xué)碩318求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
一志愿中國海洋大學(xué)，生物學(xué)，301分，求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)商家推薦: (我也要在這里推廣)
» 本主題相關(guān)價值貼推薦，對您同樣有幫助:
- 國家自然科學(xué)基金最新申報趨勢領(lǐng)會與感想-特別是選題與創(chuàng)新
已經(jīng)有33人回復(fù)
- 歡迎各位蟲子對本版的發(fā)展提出寶貴的意見和建議
已經(jīng)有21人回復(fù)
- 普通高校老師的青年基金經(jīng)驗
已經(jīng)有102人回復(fù)
- 第一年中了主任基金后第二年申請的題目要和第一年的一樣嗎？
已經(jīng)有35人回復(fù)
- 去年拿到一個主任基金，今年又申報了一個青基，中獎幾率有多許？
已經(jīng)有35人回復(fù)
- 地球科學(xué)部三處專家的評審意見！請大家?guī)臀铱纯�！謝謝！
已經(jīng)有19人回復(fù)
- 結(jié)合專家評審意見談?wù)剝赡陙砬嗄昊鸬纳暾報w會（兌現(xiàn)承諾貼）
已經(jīng)有91人回復(fù)
- 【國基評審】基金評審專家意見
已經(jīng)有55人回復(fù)
2樓2009-07-25 20:41:36
★★★★★ 五星級,優(yōu)秀推薦
|
不就幾個詞嗎？http://www.51xuewen.com/group/497/topic_4056.htm Rule 1: Be Novel, but Not Too Novel Good science begins with new and fresh ideas. The grant writing process should be a pleasure (no, we are not kidding), for it allows you to articulate those ideas to peers who have to read your grants but not necessarily your papers. Look at grant writing as an opportunity to have an impact. Feel passionate about what you are writing—if you are not passionate about the work, it is probably not a good grant and is unlikely to get funded. “Me-too” science will not get funded when funding levels are low. On the other hand, science that is too speculative will not be supported either, particularly when funds are tight—sad but true. Rule 2: Include the Appropriate Background and Preliminary Data as Required You need to convince reviewers that the work you propose needs to be done and that you are the best person to do it. Different granting programs require differing amounts of preliminary data. For certain programs, it can be said that the work must be essentially done before the grant is awarded, and that the funds are then used for the next phase of the research program. There is some truth in this. So where appropriate, do provide some tantalizing preliminary result, making sure to tell the reviewers what these results imply with respect to the specific aims of your proposal. In formulating the motivation for your proposal, make sure to cite all relevant work—there is nothing worse than not appropriately citing the work of a reviewer! Finally, convince the reviewer that you have the technical and scientific background to perform the work as proposed. Rule 3: Find the Appropriate Funding Mechanism, Read the Associated Request for Applications Very Carefully, and Respond Specifically to the Request Most funding organizations have specific staff to assist in finding funding opportunities, and most funding agencies have components of their Web sites designed to help investigators find the appropriate programs. Remember, programs want to give away money—the jobs of the program's staff depend on it. The program staff can help you identify the best opportunities. If your grant does not fit a particular program, save your time and energy, and apply elsewhere, where there is a better programmatic fit. Rule 4: Follow the Guidelines for Submission Very Carefully and Comply Many funding bodies will immediately triage grants that do not comply with the guidelines—it saves the program time and money. This extends to all the onerous supporting material—budget justification, bibliographies, etc. Get them right and keep them updated for future applications. Even if it goes to review, an inappropriately formulated application may aggravate the reviewers, and will have a negative impact even if the science is sound. Length and format are the most frequent offenders. Rule 5: Obey the Three Cs—Concise, Clear, and Complete The grant does not have to fill the allotted page count. Your goal should be to provide a complete reckoning of what is to be done, as briefly as possible. Do not rely on supplements (which may not be allowed) or on Web sites (review may be actively discouraged since it has the potential to compromise anonymity). Specify the scope up-front and make sure it is realistic with respect to the funds requested. A common temptation for inexperienced grant writers is to propose to do too much. Such applications are usually judged as overly ambitious and consequently poorly rated. Rule 6: Remember, Reviewers Are People, Too Typically, reviewers will have a large number of grants to review in a short period. They will easily lose concentration and miss key points of your proposal if these are buried in an overly lengthy or difficult-to-read document. Also, more than likely, not all the reviewers will be experts in your discipline. It is a skill to capture the interest of experts and nonexperts alike. Develop that skill. Unlike a paper, a grant provides more opportunity to apply literary skills. Historical perspectives, human interest, and humor can all be used judiciously in grants to good effect. Use formatting tricks (without disobeying rule 4), for example, underlining, bolding, etc., and restate your key points as appropriate. Each section can start with a summary of the key points. Rule 7: Timing and Internal Review Are Important Give yourself the appropriate lead time. We all have different approaches to deadlines. Ideally, you should complete a draft, leave sufficient time to get feedback from colleagues, and then look at the grant again yourself with a fresh eye. Having a spectrum of scientific colleagues who are similar to the likely reviewer pool critique your grant is very valuable. Rule 8: Know Your Grant Administrator at the Institution Funding Your Grant At the end of the day, this person is your best advocate. How well you understand each other can make a difference. Many grant administrators have some measure (limited to complete) discretionary control over what they fund. The more they know and understand you and your work, the better your chances of success. Do not rely just on E-mail to get to know the grant administrator. Do not be intimidated. Talk to them on the telephone and at meetings where possible—they want to help. Rule 9: Become a Grant Reviewer Early in Your Career Being on review panels will help you write better grants. Understanding why grants get triaged before complete review, how a panel reacts to a grant, what the discretionary role of program officers is, and what the role of oversight councils is provide valuable lessons for writing successful grants of your own and for giving others advice about this process. Rule 10: Accept Rejection and Deal with It Appropriately Rejection is inevitable, even for very good grants when funding levels are low. Learn to live with rejection and to respond appropriately. Do not be defensive; address each criticism head on and respond with facts and not emotional arguments. When resubmission is necessary, make it very clear to the reviewer that you understand what was wrong the first time. Indicate precisely how you have fixed the problems. In the resubmitted application, never argue with the validity of the prior review. If the grant was close to being funded the first time around, remind the reviewers of that fact by including the previous score if appropriate, and make it crystal clear why this version is much improved. |
3樓2009-07-25 20:56:39
4樓2009-07-25 21:01:52
6樓2009-07-25 22:00:01
7樓2009-07-26 01:17:12
8樓2009-07-26 07:35:40
9樓2009-07-26 08:00:57
10樓2009-07-26 08:17:03
11樓2009-07-26 08:31:09
12樓2009-07-26 08:51:34
13樓2009-07-26 09:14:06
15樓2009-07-26 09:54:27
17樓2009-07-26 11:53:23
20樓2009-07-26 13:28:50
22樓2009-07-26 15:58:02
23樓2009-07-26 16:49:57
24樓2009-07-26 19:48:02
26樓2009-07-26 20:49:29
27樓2009-07-26 21:17:55
29樓2009-07-26 21:48:09
30樓2009-07-26 22:03:32
32樓2009-07-26 22:32:32
33樓2009-07-27 06:57:08
34樓2009-07-27 07:05:08
35樓2009-07-27 08:06:37
36樓2009-07-27 08:08:44
37樓2009-07-27 08:10:57
38樓2009-07-27 08:17:39
39樓2009-07-27 08:50:53
40樓2009-07-27 09:00:12
41樓2009-07-27 09:04:16
42樓2009-07-27 09:10:27
43樓2009-07-27 09:18:57
44樓2009-07-27 09:20:42
45樓2009-07-27 09:24:45
|
本帖內(nèi)容被屏蔽 |
47樓2009-07-27 10:33:02
48樓2009-07-27 12:01:46
49樓2009-07-27 12:11:38
50樓2009-07-27 12:33:20
簡單回復(fù)
melody5樓
2009-07-25 21:30
回復(fù)
youaaaa14樓
2009-07-26 09:31
回復(fù)
支持
chenfuzi16樓
2009-07-26 10:58
回復(fù)
qiaoyunxiang18樓
2009-07-26 12:03
回復(fù)
annewu19樓
2009-07-26 12:04
回復(fù)
ned21樓
2009-07-26 14:03
回復(fù)
luomf25樓
2009-07-26 20:11
回復(fù)
2009-07-26 21:27
回復(fù)
yuanchang31樓
2009-07-26 22:23
回復(fù)
cgygood46樓
2009-07-27 09:31
回復(fù)
相關(guān)版塊跳轉(zhuǎn)
我要訂閱樓主 xdz1978 的主題更新
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 279分求調(diào)劑 一志愿211 +3 | chaojifeixia 2026-03-19 | 3/150 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
[考研] 329求調(diào)劑 +5 | 想上學(xué)吖吖 2026-03-19 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料學(xué)碩318求調(diào)劑 +5 | February_Feb 2026-03-19 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研]
 320求調(diào)劑0856
+3
|
不想起名字112 2026-03-19 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +4 | 18889395102 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工求調(diào)劑 +6 | 緒幸與子 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 287求調(diào)劑 +3 | 晨昏線與星海 2026-03-19 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 274求調(diào)劑 +6 | S.H1 2026-03-18 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 【同濟軟件】軟件（085405）考研求調(diào)劑 +3 | 2026eternal 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 280求調(diào)劑 +6 | 咕嚕曉曉 2026-03-18 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 278求調(diào)劑 +5 | 煙火先于春 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[基金申請] 被我言中：新模板不強調(diào)格式了，假專家開始管格式了 +4 | beefly 2026-03-14 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料工程專碩274一志愿211求調(diào)劑 +6 | 薛云鵬 2026-03-15 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 070303 總分349求調(diào)劑 +3 | LJY9966 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 070305求調(diào)劑 +3 | mlpqaz03 2026-03-14 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 294求調(diào)劑 +3 | Zys010410@ 2026-03-13 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 復(fù)試調(diào)劑 +3 | 呼呼？~+123456 2026-03-14 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿哈工大材料324分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 閆旭東 2026-03-14 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 266求調(diào)劑 +4 | 學(xué)員97LZgn 2026-03-13 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 招收0805（材料）調(diào)劑 +3 | 18595523086 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|