| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 6010 | 回復(fù): 51 | ||||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||||
siyu2009-h銅蟲(chóng) (初入文壇)
|
[交流]
第一次投SCI,修改一次后被拒,該怎么辦?急切!謝謝! 已有47人參與
|
|||
|
大家好!我是新人,真摯的謝謝每位回復(fù)的蟲(chóng)友。 我第一次投SCI,投的是APPL OPTICS,以下是主編的回復(fù),請(qǐng)問(wèn)我應(yīng)該改投還是認(rèn)真修改之后還投這個(gè)雜志。再一次謝謝給我建議的蟲(chóng)友! Dear Ms. ---: Your revised manuscript does not suitably address the reviewers’ concerns, therefore I cannot accept your manuscript in its present form for publication in Applied Optics. If you wish to revise your manuscript to meet the reviewers’ objections (given below), you may choose to resubmit it to APPLIED OPTICS. The manuscript will, however, be regarded as a new manuscript and be given a new submission date. Thank you for submitting your manuscript to APPLIED OPTICS. We hope that we will be able to serve you in the future. Sincerely ![]() ![]() ---------------------------- Reviewer comments provided here: Reviewer 1 Reviewer 2 Unfortunately, I feel that the authors have neither adequately addressed all of my own comments for mandatory amendments, or those of the other three reviewers. The paper itself is worthy of publication, but not in this form. It still requires a considerable amount of work to increase basic clarity. The problems of clarity of basic explanation are undoubtedly compounded by a poor quality of written English and language use throughout. Although the authors say in their response that they have tried to improve the English language, in reality the quality of the amended manuscript is little different to the original, and in some cases it is worse. Also, in the document supplied by the authors in response to the reviewer’s comments, several points have been addressed only within this document, i.e. directly to the reviewers, rather than having been addressed in the paper by amending the manuscript itself. Therefore, I conclude that without a further round of amendments, which is not allowed under the AO refereeing guidelines, the quality of the paper is not sufficiently high to merit publication in AO and I must therefore recommend rejection of the paper. Should the authors wish to re-submit afresh, I would recommend getting somebody else to look at the written language and to improve clarity. The technical material is worthy of publication, but the paper must be improved. ---------------------------- |
百寶箱 |
榮譽(yù)版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
還沒(méi)想好
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +14 |

至尊木蟲(chóng) (著名寫手)

禁蟲(chóng) (著名寫手)
|
主要是語(yǔ)言問(wèn)題,找牛人幫助修改吧 本文來(lái)自: 小木蟲(chóng)論壇 http://www.gaoyang168.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=2617839&fpage=1 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 壓國(guó)家一區(qū)線,求導(dǎo)師收留,有恩必謝! +7 | 迷人的哈哈 2026-03-28 | 7/350 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +6 | 曼殊2266 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 283求調(diào)劑 +7 | A child 2026-03-28 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 085602 307分 求調(diào)劑 +7 | 不知道叫什么! 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
[材料工程] 一志愿C9材料與化工專業(yè)總分300求調(diào)劑 +8 | 曼111 2026-03-24 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 291求調(diào)劑 +7 | 孅華 2026-03-22 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +8 | 張zz111 2026-03-27 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 285求調(diào)劑 +4 | AZMK 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿211院校 344分 東北農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)生物學(xué)學(xué)碩,求調(diào)劑 +5 | 丶風(fēng)雪夜歸人丶 2026-03-26 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 材料292調(diào)劑 +12 | 橘頌思美人 2026-03-23 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 283求調(diào)劑(080500) +4 | A child 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 一志愿 本科 北科大 化學(xué) 343 +6 | 13831862839 2026-03-24 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué)調(diào)劑一志愿上海交通大學(xué)336分-本科上海211 +4 | 小魚愛(ài)有機(jī) 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿上海交大生物與醫(yī)藥專碩324分,求調(diào)劑 +6 | jiajunX 2026-03-22 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿哈工大,085400,320,求調(diào)劑 +4 | gdlf9999 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 285求調(diào)劑 +3 | AZMK 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0854電子信息求調(diào)劑 324 +4 | Promise-jyl 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 289材料與化工(085600)B區(qū)求調(diào)劑 +4 | 這么名字咋樣 2026-03-22 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿河北工業(yè)大學(xué)0817化工278分求調(diào)劑 +7 | jhybd 2026-03-23 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 336化工調(diào)劑 +4 | 王大坦1 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|