| 查看: 6004 | 回復(fù): 51 | ||||
siyu2009-h銅蟲 (初入文壇)
|
[交流]
第一次投SCI,修改一次后被拒,該怎么辦?急切!謝謝! 已有47人參與
|
|
大家好!我是新人,真摯的謝謝每位回復(fù)的蟲友。 我第一次投SCI,投的是APPL OPTICS,以下是主編的回復(fù),請(qǐng)問我應(yīng)該改投還是認(rèn)真修改之后還投這個(gè)雜志。再一次謝謝給我建議的蟲友! Dear Ms. ---: Your revised manuscript does not suitably address the reviewers’ concerns, therefore I cannot accept your manuscript in its present form for publication in Applied Optics. If you wish to revise your manuscript to meet the reviewers’ objections (given below), you may choose to resubmit it to APPLIED OPTICS. The manuscript will, however, be regarded as a new manuscript and be given a new submission date. Thank you for submitting your manuscript to APPLIED OPTICS. We hope that we will be able to serve you in the future. Sincerely ![]() ![]() ---------------------------- Reviewer comments provided here: Reviewer 1 Reviewer 2 Unfortunately, I feel that the authors have neither adequately addressed all of my own comments for mandatory amendments, or those of the other three reviewers. The paper itself is worthy of publication, but not in this form. It still requires a considerable amount of work to increase basic clarity. The problems of clarity of basic explanation are undoubtedly compounded by a poor quality of written English and language use throughout. Although the authors say in their response that they have tried to improve the English language, in reality the quality of the amended manuscript is little different to the original, and in some cases it is worse. Also, in the document supplied by the authors in response to the reviewer’s comments, several points have been addressed only within this document, i.e. directly to the reviewers, rather than having been addressed in the paper by amending the manuscript itself. Therefore, I conclude that without a further round of amendments, which is not allowed under the AO refereeing guidelines, the quality of the paper is not sufficiently high to merit publication in AO and I must therefore recommend rejection of the paper. Should the authors wish to re-submit afresh, I would recommend getting somebody else to look at the written language and to improve clarity. The technical material is worthy of publication, but the paper must be improved. ---------------------------- |
百寶箱 |
至尊木蟲 (著名寫手)

禁蟲 (著名寫手)
|
主要是語言問題,找牛人幫助修改吧 本文來自: 小木蟲論壇 http://www.gaoyang168.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=2617839&fpage=1 |
木蟲 (知名作家)
gxgm111

榮譽(yù)版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
還沒想好
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +14 |

捐助貴賓 (知名作家)
環(huán)能蟲

木蟲之王 (文學(xué)泰斗)
鐵桿木蟲 (著名寫手)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 317分 一志愿南理工材料工程 本科湖工大 求調(diào)劑 +6 | 芋泥小鈴鐺 2026-03-28 | 6/300 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 299求調(diào)劑 +7 | 嗯嗯嗯嗯2 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 283求調(diào)劑 +7 | A child 2026-03-28 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南京航空航天大學(xué)材料學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑 +3 | @taotao 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 295求調(diào)劑 +5 | 1428151015 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工調(diào)劑 +10 | A-哆啦Z夢(mèng) 2026-03-23 | 16/800 |
|
|
[考研] 333求調(diào)劑 +3 | question挽風(fēng) 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +9 | 小蠟新筆 2026-03-26 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿吉大071010,316分求調(diào)劑 +3 | xgbiknn 2026-03-27 | 3/150 |
|
|
[碩博家園] 北京林業(yè)大學(xué)碩導(dǎo)招生廣告 +6 | kongweilin 2026-03-26 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 317求調(diào)劑 +7 | 蛋黃咸肉粽 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑求收留 +7 | 果然有我 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 327求調(diào)劑 +7 | prayer13 2026-03-23 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué)工程085602 305分求調(diào)劑 +17 | RichLi_ 2026-03-25 | 17/850 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南航 335分 | 0856材料化工 | GPA 4.07 | 有科研經(jīng)歷 +6 | cccchenso 2026-03-23 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 0854電子信息求調(diào)劑 324 +4 | Promise-jyl 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 340求調(diào)劑 +5 | 話梅糖111 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑一志愿武漢理工大學(xué)材料工程(085601) +5 | WW.' 2026-03-23 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研]
|
13659058978 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑一志愿海大,0703化學(xué)學(xué)碩304分,有大創(chuàng)項(xiàng)目,四級(jí)已過 +6 | 幸運(yùn)哩哩 2026-03-22 | 10/500 |
|