| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 6005 | 回復(fù): 51 | ||||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||||
siyu2009-h銅蟲 (初入文壇)
|
[交流]
第一次投SCI,修改一次后被拒,該怎么辦?急切!謝謝! 已有47人參與
|
|||
|
大家好!我是新人,真摯的謝謝每位回復(fù)的蟲友。 我第一次投SCI,投的是APPL OPTICS,以下是主編的回復(fù),請問我應(yīng)該改投還是認(rèn)真修改之后還投這個(gè)雜志。再一次謝謝給我建議的蟲友! Dear Ms. ---: Your revised manuscript does not suitably address the reviewers’ concerns, therefore I cannot accept your manuscript in its present form for publication in Applied Optics. If you wish to revise your manuscript to meet the reviewers’ objections (given below), you may choose to resubmit it to APPLIED OPTICS. The manuscript will, however, be regarded as a new manuscript and be given a new submission date. Thank you for submitting your manuscript to APPLIED OPTICS. We hope that we will be able to serve you in the future. Sincerely ![]() ![]() ---------------------------- Reviewer comments provided here: Reviewer 1 Reviewer 2 Unfortunately, I feel that the authors have neither adequately addressed all of my own comments for mandatory amendments, or those of the other three reviewers. The paper itself is worthy of publication, but not in this form. It still requires a considerable amount of work to increase basic clarity. The problems of clarity of basic explanation are undoubtedly compounded by a poor quality of written English and language use throughout. Although the authors say in their response that they have tried to improve the English language, in reality the quality of the amended manuscript is little different to the original, and in some cases it is worse. Also, in the document supplied by the authors in response to the reviewer’s comments, several points have been addressed only within this document, i.e. directly to the reviewers, rather than having been addressed in the paper by amending the manuscript itself. Therefore, I conclude that without a further round of amendments, which is not allowed under the AO refereeing guidelines, the quality of the paper is not sufficiently high to merit publication in AO and I must therefore recommend rejection of the paper. Should the authors wish to re-submit afresh, I would recommend getting somebody else to look at the written language and to improve clarity. The technical material is worthy of publication, but the paper must be improved. ---------------------------- |
百寶箱 |
木蟲之王 (文學(xué)泰斗)
至尊木蟲 (著名寫手)

禁蟲 (著名寫手)
|
主要是語言問題,找牛人幫助修改吧 本文來自: 小木蟲論壇 http://www.gaoyang168.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=2617839&fpage=1 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 22408 359分調(diào)劑 +3 | Qshers 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 340求調(diào)劑 +5 | jhx777 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +8 | 張zz111 2026-03-27 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 275求調(diào)劑 +10 | jjjjjjjjjjl 2026-03-27 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 265求調(diào)劑 +8 | 小木蟲085600 2026-03-27 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工085600,總分304,本科有兩篇sci參與,求調(diào)劑 +10 | 幸運(yùn)的醬醬 2026-03-22 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 307求調(diào)劑 +8 | 超級伊昂大王 2026-03-24 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 274求調(diào)劑 +17 | 顧九笙要謙虛 2026-03-24 | 23/1150 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)338求調(diào)劑! +6 | Zuhui0306 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
[碩博家園] 招收生物學(xué)/細(xì)胞生物學(xué)調(diào)劑 +3 | IceGuo 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 317求調(diào)劑 +7 | 蛋黃咸肉粽 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 349求調(diào)劑 +4 | 李木子啊哈哈 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +8 | Auroracx 2026-03-22 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿211 初試270分 求調(diào)劑 +6 | 谷雨上岸 2026-03-23 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 352求調(diào)劑 +4 | 大米飯! 2026-03-22 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 環(huán)境專碩324分求調(diào)劑推薦 +5 | 軒小寧—— 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南航 335分 | 0856材料化工 | GPA 4.07 | 有科研經(jīng)歷 +6 | cccchenso 2026-03-23 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中南大學(xué)化學(xué)學(xué)碩0703總分337求調(diào)劑 +7 | niko- 2026-03-22 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 生物技術(shù)與工程 +3 | 1294608413 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 347求調(diào)劑 +4 | L when 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|