| 查看: 6008 | 回復: 51 | ||||
siyu2009-h銅蟲 (初入文壇)
|
[交流]
第一次投SCI,修改一次后被拒,該怎么辦?急切!謝謝! 已有47人參與
|
|
大家好!我是新人,真摯的謝謝每位回復的蟲友。 我第一次投SCI,投的是APPL OPTICS,以下是主編的回復,請問我應該改投還是認真修改之后還投這個雜志。再一次謝謝給我建議的蟲友! Dear Ms. ---: Your revised manuscript does not suitably address the reviewers’ concerns, therefore I cannot accept your manuscript in its present form for publication in Applied Optics. If you wish to revise your manuscript to meet the reviewers’ objections (given below), you may choose to resubmit it to APPLIED OPTICS. The manuscript will, however, be regarded as a new manuscript and be given a new submission date. Thank you for submitting your manuscript to APPLIED OPTICS. We hope that we will be able to serve you in the future. Sincerely ![]() ![]() ---------------------------- Reviewer comments provided here: Reviewer 1 Reviewer 2 Unfortunately, I feel that the authors have neither adequately addressed all of my own comments for mandatory amendments, or those of the other three reviewers. The paper itself is worthy of publication, but not in this form. It still requires a considerable amount of work to increase basic clarity. The problems of clarity of basic explanation are undoubtedly compounded by a poor quality of written English and language use throughout. Although the authors say in their response that they have tried to improve the English language, in reality the quality of the amended manuscript is little different to the original, and in some cases it is worse. Also, in the document supplied by the authors in response to the reviewer’s comments, several points have been addressed only within this document, i.e. directly to the reviewers, rather than having been addressed in the paper by amending the manuscript itself. Therefore, I conclude that without a further round of amendments, which is not allowed under the AO refereeing guidelines, the quality of the paper is not sufficiently high to merit publication in AO and I must therefore recommend rejection of the paper. Should the authors wish to re-submit afresh, I would recommend getting somebody else to look at the written language and to improve clarity. The technical material is worthy of publication, but the paper must be improved. ---------------------------- |
百寶箱 |
至尊木蟲 (著名寫手)

禁蟲 (著名寫手)
|
主要是語言問題,找牛人幫助修改吧 本文來自: 小木蟲論壇 http://www.gaoyang168.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=2617839&fpage=1 |
木蟲 (知名作家)
gxgm111

榮譽版主 (文學泰斗)
還沒想好
![]() |
專家經驗: +14 |

捐助貴賓 (知名作家)
環(huán)能蟲

木蟲之王 (文學泰斗)
鐵桿木蟲 (著名寫手)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 本科新能源科學與工程,一志愿華理能動285求調劑 +7 | AZMK 2026-03-28 | 11/550 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 312,生物學求調劑 +3 | 小譯同學abc 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 求調劑 +6 | 蘆lty 2026-03-25 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 291求調劑 +6 | HanBeiNingZC 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 復試調劑,一志愿南農083200食品科學與工程 +5 | XQTJZ 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 085600,材料與化工321分調劑 +4 | 大饞小子 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿吉大071010,316分求調劑 +3 | xgbiknn 2026-03-27 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 276求調劑。有半年電池和半年高分子實習經歷 +10 | 材料學257求調劑 2026-03-23 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 327求調劑 +7 | prayer13 2026-03-23 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 材料考研求調劑 +3 | Dendel 2026-03-23 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 總分293求調劑 +6 | 加一一九 2026-03-25 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 263求調劑 +6 | yqdszhdap- 2026-03-22 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 環(huán)境專碩324分求調劑推薦 +5 | 軒小寧—— 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 07化學303求調劑 +5 | 睿08 2026-03-25 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 293求調劑 +7 | 加一一九 2026-03-24 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 材料調劑 +3 | iwinso 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿武理085500機械專業(yè)總分300求調劑 +3 | an10101 2026-03-24 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研]
|
黃粱一夢千年 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 277分求調劑,跨調材料 +3 | 考研調劑lxh 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
[基金申請] 請教下大家 2026年國家基金申請是雙盲審嗎? +3 | lishucheng1 2026-03-22 | 5/250 |
|