 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1315 | 回復: 4 | ||
zhou_jun木蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
請問這種審稿意見怎么回復?
|
|
從去年十月開始寫作,年底投稿,二月份收到審稿人意見: The article describes implementation and application of the *** parallel codes, and their input and output graphical infrastructure. The authors have been very successful in this large project. Their algorithms as described are well established in prior practice, as cited in the references. Other algorithms and methods, e.g. boundary conditions, and their strategy for dynamic load balancing, are not described. Results in several device contexts are verified by comparison to other codes. The development and verification of these codes is a creditable accomplishment in providing the authors with a powerful modeling tool. However this reviewer does not find new algorithms or methods, nor new physics or device results, in these manuscripts. Publication in *** is not recommended. 可以看出,審稿人先是肯定了我們的工作,并且評價還是可以,但最后還是由于沒有new algorithms or methods, new physics or device results而認為不適合發(fā)表. 我們按照意見新增了一些內(nèi)容,主要就是審稿人提到的boundary conditions, and strategy for dynamic load balancing等詳細內(nèi)容. 結(jié)果審稿人二次審回意見還是抓住這一點不放: In comparison to the original manuscript, the changes found are mainly the discussion of boundary conditions and optimization of parallelization, via re-partitioning for load balancing. There is no evidence that they have advanced the state of that art. The main body of algorithms as described are well established in prior practice and documented in publications. This reviewer still does not find new physics or device results in this revision. In the development of these codes, the authors have assembled a good selection of algorithms and infrastructure to fit their computer facility and applications. They then carefully verify their codes by comparison with previous results. This is a systematic, laudable development of their modeling capability. But I believe the manuscript does not "contain significant new research contributions" (item 1 in "Publication Standards and Review Procedures). Publication in *** is not recommended. 這次我們雖然盡力充實和很多內(nèi)容,但審稿人還是認為沒有創(chuàng)新點,即使后面肯定了我們的工作,但還是認為不能發(fā)表. 編輯讓我們再次按照審稿意見修改,但我面對這樣一份意見,完全不知道如何下手,毫無頭緒.現(xiàn)在修回期限快到了,只好打算寫一份比較詳細的解釋說明來回復審稿人,希望能說服他. 雖然這樣希望不大,但事到如今只好背水一戰(zhàn)了. 請問大家在措辭上和內(nèi)容上怎么寫比較好? 本人經(jīng)驗有限,請各位蟲蟲多幫忙支支招啊! |
回復此樓» 猜你喜歡
280分求調(diào)劑 一志愿085802
已經(jīng)有6人回復
-
0854電子信息求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復
-
263求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復
-
石河子大學（211、雙一流）碩博研究生長期招生公告
已經(jīng)有3人回復
-
一志愿西安交通大學材料工程專業(yè) 282分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有13人回復
-
北科281學碩材料求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復
-
328求調(diào)劑，英語六級551，有科研經(jīng)歷
已經(jīng)有10人回復
-
298求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復
-
310求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復
-
311求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復
» 本主題相關(guān)價值貼推薦，對您同樣有幫助:
- 很不友好的審稿意見該如何回復
已經(jīng)有5人回復
- 論文審稿意見回來了，大家看看如何回復啊
已經(jīng)有16人回復
- 像這種審稿意見該怎么回答啊？
已經(jīng)有10人回復
- 【求助】麻煩幫忙看看我的審稿意見怎么回復啊，關(guān)于SEI膜
已經(jīng)有13人回復
- 怎么沒有提交回復審稿意見這一項��？
已經(jīng)有5人回復
- SCI投稿審稿人意見是這樣的怎么回復？
已經(jīng)有9人回復
- 求助 這樣的審稿意見該怎么回復
已經(jīng)有5人回復
- 該如何回復這種審稿意見？
已經(jīng)有4人回復
- SCIENCE CHINA Information Sciences 一個審稿意見為中文一個為英文，如何回復
已經(jīng)有21人回復
- 很有趣：當Reviewer變成文章的合作者時，如何回復他的審稿意見？請高人指點，謝謝！
已經(jīng)有35人回復
- 編輯發(fā)錯審稿意見了如何寫信詢問
已經(jīng)有15人回復
- 請大家?guī)兔纯慈绾位貜蛯徃逡庖?/a>
已經(jīng)有4人回復
- 審稿意見回復請教
已經(jīng)有4人回復
- 幫忙看看如何回復審稿人意見，急�。�！
已經(jīng)有5人回復
- 審稿人意見如何回復？
已經(jīng)有11人回復
ahmau
銀蟲 (正式寫手)
- 應助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 1102.1
- 散金: 1180
- 紅花: 2
- 帖子: 755
- 在線: 170.6小時
- 蟲號: 755812
- 注冊: 2009-04-23
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 爆炸與沖擊動力學
2樓2011-06-17 18:07:07
starared
禁蟲 (著名寫手)
- SEPI: 1
- 應助: 19 (小學生)
- 貴賓: 0.001
- 金幣: 6080.8
- 散金: 172
- 紅花: 3
- 帖子: 1825
- 在線: 762.4小時
- 蟲號: 1137379
- 注冊: 2010-11-02
- 專業(yè): 樣品前處理方法與技術(shù)
【答案】應助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
zhou_jun(金幣+2): 2011-06-18 10:20:21
wg423(金幣+8): 感謝應助，代發(fā)金幣 2011-12-27 09:32:50
zhou_jun(金幣+2): 2011-06-18 10:20:21
wg423(金幣+8): 感謝應助，代發(fā)金幣 2011-12-27 09:32:50
|
建議多看看文獻,挖掘和歸納好自己論文的重新點,這個很重要. http://www.gaoyang168.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=3203353&fpage=2 |
3樓2011-06-18 07:24:28
sj1972
銀蟲 (小有名氣)
- 應助: 2 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 1421.4
- 散金: 40
- 紅花: 1
- 帖子: 205
- 在線: 72.8小時
- 蟲號: 739478
- 注冊: 2009-04-03
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 作物生理學
4樓2011-06-18 08:08:59
physics123
銀蟲 (小有名氣)
- 應助: 1 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 615.1
- 帖子: 167
- 在線: 50.7小時
- 蟲號: 298579
- 注冊: 2006-11-19
- 專業(yè): 等離子體物理
5樓2011-12-25 20:29:34
相關(guān)版塊跳轉(zhuǎn)
我要訂閱樓主 zhou_jun 的主題更新
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0854電子信息求調(diào)劑 +3 | α____ 2026-03-22 | 3/150 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料與化工085600，總分304，本科有兩篇sci參與，求調(diào)劑 +4 | 幸運的醬醬 2026-03-22 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 招08考數(shù)學 +4 | laoshidan 2026-03-20 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中南大學化學學碩0703總分337求調(diào)劑 +3 | niko- 2026-03-22 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考博] 招收博士1-2人 +3 | QGZDSYS 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 333求調(diào)劑 +5 | 87639 2026-03-21 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +3 | 13341 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 307求調(diào)劑 +3 | 余意卿 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 302求調(diào)劑 +12 | 呼呼呼。。。。 2026-03-17 | 12/600 |
|
|
|
[考研] 299求調(diào)劑 +4 | 某某某某位 2026-03-21 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +3 | .m.. 2026-03-21 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[基金申請]
學校已經(jīng)提交到NSFC，還能修改嗎？
 40+4
|
babangida 2026-03-19 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 299求調(diào)劑 +6 | △小透明* 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +6 | 曼殊2266 2026-03-18 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +3 | 阿姐阿姐家啊 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料學求調(diào)劑 +4 | Stella_Yao 2026-03-20 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703化學調(diào)劑 +5 | pupcoco 2026-03-17 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 本科鄭州大學物理學院，一志愿華科070200學碩，346求調(diào)劑 +4 | 我不是一根蔥 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 334求調(diào)劑 +3 | 志存高遠意在機?/a> 2026-03-16 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南京大學，080500材料科學與工程，調(diào)劑 +4 | Jy? 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|