 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1343 | 回復(fù): 4 | ||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||
zhou_jun木蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
請問這種審稿意見怎么回復(fù)?
|
|
|
從去年十月開始寫作,年底投稿,二月份收到審稿人意見: The article describes implementation and application of the *** parallel codes, and their input and output graphical infrastructure. The authors have been very successful in this large project. Their algorithms as described are well established in prior practice, as cited in the references. Other algorithms and methods, e.g. boundary conditions, and their strategy for dynamic load balancing, are not described. Results in several device contexts are verified by comparison to other codes. The development and verification of these codes is a creditable accomplishment in providing the authors with a powerful modeling tool. However this reviewer does not find new algorithms or methods, nor new physics or device results, in these manuscripts. Publication in *** is not recommended. 可以看出,審稿人先是肯定了我們的工作,并且評價還是可以,但最后還是由于沒有new algorithms or methods, new physics or device results而認為不適合發(fā)表. 我們按照意見新增了一些內(nèi)容,主要就是審稿人提到的boundary conditions, and strategy for dynamic load balancing等詳細內(nèi)容. 結(jié)果審稿人二次審回意見還是抓住這一點不放: In comparison to the original manuscript, the changes found are mainly the discussion of boundary conditions and optimization of parallelization, via re-partitioning for load balancing. There is no evidence that they have advanced the state of that art. The main body of algorithms as described are well established in prior practice and documented in publications. This reviewer still does not find new physics or device results in this revision. In the development of these codes, the authors have assembled a good selection of algorithms and infrastructure to fit their computer facility and applications. They then carefully verify their codes by comparison with previous results. This is a systematic, laudable development of their modeling capability. But I believe the manuscript does not "contain significant new research contributions" (item 1 in "Publication Standards and Review Procedures). Publication in *** is not recommended. 這次我們雖然盡力充實和很多內(nèi)容,但審稿人還是認為沒有創(chuàng)新點,即使后面肯定了我們的工作,但還是認為不能發(fā)表. 編輯讓我們再次按照審稿意見修改,但我面對這樣一份意見,完全不知道如何下手,毫無頭緒.現(xiàn)在修回期限快到了,只好打算寫一份比較詳細的解釋說明來回復(fù)審稿人,希望能說服他. 雖然這樣希望不大,但事到如今只好背水一戰(zhàn)了. 請問大家在措辭上和內(nèi)容上怎么寫比較好? 本人經(jīng)驗有限,請各位蟲蟲多幫忙支支招啊! |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
309求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
-
環(huán)境科學(xué)與工程334分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
085404求調(diào)劑，總分309，本科經(jīng)歷較為豐富
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
285求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
求化學(xué)調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
材料工程專碩求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
317求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
-
318求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
化學(xué)308分調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
一志愿河北工業(yè)大學(xué)0817化工278分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有18人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)價值貼推薦，對您同樣有幫助:
- 很不友好的審稿意見該如何回復(fù)
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- 論文審稿意見回來了，大家看看如何回復(fù)啊
已經(jīng)有16人回復(fù)
- 像這種審稿意見該怎么回答啊？
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
- 【求助】麻煩幫忙看看我的審稿意見怎么回復(fù)啊，關(guān)于SEI膜
已經(jīng)有13人回復(fù)
- 怎么沒有提交回復(fù)審稿意見這一項啊？
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- SCI投稿審稿人意見是這樣的怎么回復(fù)？
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
- 求助 這樣的審稿意見該怎么回復(fù)
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- 該如何回復(fù)這種審稿意見？
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
- SCIENCE CHINA Information Sciences 一個審稿意見為中文一個為英文，如何回復(fù)
已經(jīng)有21人回復(fù)
- 很有趣：當(dāng)Reviewer變成文章的合作者時，如何回復(fù)他的審稿意見？請高人指點，謝謝！
已經(jīng)有35人回復(fù)
- 編輯發(fā)錯審稿意見了如何寫信詢問
已經(jīng)有15人回復(fù)
- 請大家?guī)兔纯慈绾位貜?fù)審稿意見
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
- 審稿意見回復(fù)請教
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
- 幫忙看看如何回復(fù)審稿人意見，急�。�！
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- 審稿人意見如何回復(fù)？
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
physics123
銀蟲 (小有名氣)
- 應(yīng)助: 1 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 615.1
- 帖子: 167
- 在線: 50.7小時
- 蟲號: 298579
- 注冊: 2006-11-19
- 專業(yè): 等離子體物理
5樓2011-12-25 20:29:34
ahmau
銀蟲 (正式寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 1102.1
- 散金: 1180
- 紅花: 2
- 帖子: 755
- 在線: 170.6小時
- 蟲號: 755812
- 注冊: 2009-04-23
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 爆炸與沖擊動力學(xué)
2樓2011-06-17 18:07:07
starared
禁蟲 (著名寫手)
- SEPI: 1
- 應(yīng)助: 19 (小學(xué)生)
- 貴賓: 0.001
- 金幣: 6080.8
- 散金: 172
- 紅花: 3
- 帖子: 1825
- 在線: 762.4小時
- 蟲號: 1137379
- 注冊: 2010-11-02
- 專業(yè): 樣品前處理方法與技術(shù)
【答案】應(yīng)助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
zhou_jun(金幣+2): 2011-06-18 10:20:21
wg423(金幣+8): 感謝應(yīng)助，代發(fā)金幣 2011-12-27 09:32:50
zhou_jun(金幣+2): 2011-06-18 10:20:21
wg423(金幣+8): 感謝應(yīng)助，代發(fā)金幣 2011-12-27 09:32:50
|
建議多看看文獻,挖掘和歸納好自己論文的重新點,這個很重要. http://www.gaoyang168.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=3203353&fpage=2 |
3樓2011-06-18 07:24:28
sj1972
銀蟲 (小有名氣)
- 應(yīng)助: 2 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 1421.4
- 散金: 40
- 紅花: 1
- 帖子: 205
- 在線: 72.8小時
- 蟲號: 739478
- 注冊: 2009-04-03
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 作物生理學(xué)
4樓2011-06-18 08:08:59
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 279求調(diào)劑 +4 | j的立方 2026-03-29 | 4/200 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +10 | 張zz111 2026-03-27 | 11/550 |
|
|
|
[基金申請] 面上5B能上會嗎？ +5 | redcom 2026-03-29 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑310 +12 | 溫柔的晚安 2026-03-25 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南昌大學(xué)324求調(diào)劑 +5 | hanamiko 2026-03-29 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑，一志愿 南京航空航天大學(xué) ，080500材料科學(xué)與工程學(xué)碩，總分289分 +7 | @taotao 2026-03-29 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 食品工程專碩一志愿中海洋309求調(diào)劑 +4 | 小張zxy張 2026-03-26 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703一志愿9，初試成績：338，四六級已過，有科研經(jīng)歷，求調(diào)劑！ +4 | Zuhui0306 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 086502化學(xué)工程342求調(diào)劑 +6 | 阿姨復(fù)古不過 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)求調(diào)劑，各位老師看看我�。。� +5 | 祁祺祺 2026-03-25 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 279 分 求調(diào)劑 +4 | 睡個好覺_16 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 348求調(diào)劑 +4 | 小懶蟲不懶了 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +9 | 小蠟新筆 2026-03-26 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)338求調(diào)劑！ +6 | Zuhui0306 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 324求調(diào)劑 +8 | hanamiko 2026-03-26 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 289求調(diào)劑 +17 | 碩星赴 2026-03-23 | 17/850 |
|
|
|
[考研] 07化學(xué)303求調(diào)劑 +5 | 睿08 2026-03-25 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 340求調(diào)劑 +5 | 話梅糖111 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南航材料專317分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 炸呀炸呀炸薯條 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿山東大學(xué)藥學(xué)學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑 +3 | 開開心心沒煩惱 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|