 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1423 | 回復: 9 | |||
| 本帖產(chǎn)生 1 個 ESEPI ，點擊這里進行查看 | |||
| 當前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
zhaokan123金蟲 (正式寫手)
|
[交流]
Which is better, traditional Chinese characters or simplified Chinese characters
|
||
|
There is always an arguement about the use of traditional Chinese characters and simplified Chinese characters among we Chinese people. Some people argue that traditional Chinese characters, also known as the original coplex form of Chinese characters, should be applied the basic characters we use in our daily life, because these characters represent our history and traditional culture, which remind us who we are. A typical example goes to the calligraphy--a treasure we all cherish--which becomes meaningless in the form of simplified Chiese characters. However, there is also voices insist that simplified Chinese characters are better, as they are easier to learn, and most importantly, are time saving, which sparkles since we live in a rapidly developing world. They hold the opinion that those issues related to cuture and history should be protected by those people who doing the cutural and historical jobs, rather than we common people. So, what is your opinion on it? [ Last edited by zhaokan123 on 2012-2-4 at 15:43 ] |
回復此樓» 猜你喜歡
086502化學工程342求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復
-
材料求調(diào)劑 一志愿哈工大總分298分，前三科223分
已經(jīng)有5人回復
-
085600 286分 材料求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復
-
材料求調(diào)劑一志愿哈工大324
已經(jīng)有7人回復
-
328求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復
-
340求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復
-
一志愿南昌大學324求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復
-
求調(diào)劑推薦 材料 304
已經(jīng)有15人回復
-
291求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有19人回復
-
331環(huán)境科學與工程求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復
poyoro
木蟲 (文壇精英)
- ESEPI: 13
- 應助: 3 (幼兒園)
- 貴賓: 1.05
- 金幣: 1492.8
- 散金: 12871
- 紅花: 23
- 沙發(fā): 209
- 帖子: 10651
- 在線: 1172.7小時
- 蟲號: 589231
- 注冊: 2008-08-29
|
Meaningless argument. Whether TCC or SCC up to you, both views have their own reason to support the argument. I wonder is it really important for us to debate which one is the better,which one is suit for us. Do the people who use TCC know the historical and cultural information?Do the people who use SCC are in times front row ,or they had forget who they are? Do they care about the calligraph's meaning? Funny. |
4樓2012-02-05 00:47:10
5樓2012-02-05 02:34:23
zhaokan123
金蟲 (正式寫手)
- ESEPI: 2
- 應助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 866.5
- 沙發(fā): 1
- 帖子: 594
- 在線: 112.1小時
- 蟲號: 537892
- 注冊: 2008-04-02
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 合成藥物化學
|
I might not have expressed my opinion clearly enough, but this debate is not a meaningless one. In fact, the society has its tendency, for example, SCC occupied our print or internet or TV show. Thus, it is not up to us individuals to make a choice between TCC and SCC. Many people insist that TCC should be dominant in these areas. TCC may not necessarily promote our awareness of art or history, but Calligraphy is expressed in the form of TCC, and many ancient books involve words that SCC does not full addressed. Unfortunately, under a SCC environment, we may have less chance to know about TCC. |
6樓2012-02-05 14:25:44
zhaokan123
金蟲 (正式寫手)
- ESEPI: 2
- 應助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 866.5
- 沙發(fā): 1
- 帖子: 594
- 在線: 112.1小時
- 蟲號: 537892
- 注冊: 2008-04-02
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 合成藥物化學
|
There also exists an opposite opinion exists in me. Why Chinese language can't become an international one like English? Except for the difference between the power of the goverments, the characters itself is responsible as well. As we all know, Chinese characters are pictographic character, it is impossible to extract units of the words, which make these characters easier to comprehend. On the countary, English words consist of letters, and they are simplified symbols. To summarize my perspective, characters, as a tool, the easier, the better; but as a surppot of culture, the more original, the better. |
7樓2012-02-05 14:41:53
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0856，材料與化工321分求調(diào)劑 +8 | 大饞小子 2026-03-27 | 9/450 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
[考研] 085602 307分 求調(diào)劑 +6 | 不知道叫什么！ 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 070300化學求調(diào)劑 +4 | 起個名咋這么難 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料292調(diào)劑 +12 | 橘頌思美人 2026-03-23 | 12/600 |
|
|
|
[考博] 26申博 +3 | 加油沖��！ 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +6 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703一志愿9，初試成績：338，四六級已過，有科研經(jīng)歷，求調(diào)劑！ +3 | Zuhui0306 2026-03-25 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 22408 359分調(diào)劑 +3 | Qshers 2026-03-27 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703化學一志愿南京師范大學303求調(diào)劑 +3 | zzffylgg 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +3 | 曼殊2266 2026-03-27 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 一志愿 本科 北科大 化學 343 +6 | 13831862839 2026-03-24 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 321求調(diào)劑 +5 | 材料cailiao 2026-03-21 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 生物學 296 求調(diào)劑 +4 | 朵朵- 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 271求調(diào)劑 +6 | 生如夏花… 2026-03-22 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 302求調(diào)劑 +4 | 錦衣衛(wèi)藤椒 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0854電子信息求調(diào)劑 +7 | α____ 2026-03-22 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料調(diào)劑 +3 | iwinso 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿吉大化學322求調(diào)劑 +4 | 17501029541 2026-03-23 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 269求調(diào)劑 +4 | 我想讀研11 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 生物學調(diào)劑 +5 | Surekei 2026-03-21 | 5/250 |
|