 |
 |
 |
| 24小時(shí)熱門(mén)版塊排行榜 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1431 | 回復(fù): 9 | |||
| 本帖產(chǎn)生 1 個(gè) ESEPI ，點(diǎn)擊這里進(jìn)行查看 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
zhaokan123金蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
|
[交流]
Which is better, traditional Chinese characters or simplified Chinese characters
|
||
|
There is always an arguement about the use of traditional Chinese characters and simplified Chinese characters among we Chinese people. Some people argue that traditional Chinese characters, also known as the original coplex form of Chinese characters, should be applied the basic characters we use in our daily life, because these characters represent our history and traditional culture, which remind us who we are. A typical example goes to the calligraphy--a treasure we all cherish--which becomes meaningless in the form of simplified Chiese characters. However, there is also voices insist that simplified Chinese characters are better, as they are easier to learn, and most importantly, are time saving, which sparkles since we live in a rapidly developing world. They hold the opinion that those issues related to cuture and history should be protected by those people who doing the cutural and historical jobs, rather than we common people. So, what is your opinion on it? [ Last edited by zhaokan123 on 2012-2-4 at 15:43 ] |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
291求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有25人回復(fù)
-
一志愿北京科技大學(xué)085601材料工程英一數(shù)二初試總分335求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
一志愿北京科技，085601總分305求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
-
化學(xué)工程專(zhuān)碩324分，一志愿中國(guó)礦業(yè)大學(xué)求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
279求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
26年申博
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
材料工程322分
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
318求調(diào)劑，計(jì)算材料方向
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
292分，材料與化工，申請(qǐng)調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有20人回復(fù)
-
085600 295分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有18人回復(fù)
5樓2012-02-05 02:34:23
poyoro
木蟲(chóng) (文壇精英)
- ESEPI: 13
- 應(yīng)助: 3 (幼兒園)
- 貴賓: 1.05
- 金幣: 1492.8
- 散金: 12871
- 紅花: 23
- 沙發(fā): 209
- 帖子: 10651
- 在線: 1172.7小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 589231
- 注冊(cè): 2008-08-29
|
Meaningless argument. Whether TCC or SCC up to you, both views have their own reason to support the argument. I wonder is it really important for us to debate which one is the better,which one is suit for us. Do the people who use TCC know the historical and cultural information?Do the people who use SCC are in times front row ,or they had forget who they are? Do they care about the calligraph's meaning? Funny. |
4樓2012-02-05 00:47:10
zhaokan123
金蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
- ESEPI: 2
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 866.5
- 沙發(fā): 1
- 帖子: 594
- 在線: 112.1小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 537892
- 注冊(cè): 2008-04-02
- 性別: GG
- 專(zhuān)業(yè): 合成藥物化學(xué)
|
I might not have expressed my opinion clearly enough, but this debate is not a meaningless one. In fact, the society has its tendency, for example, SCC occupied our print or internet or TV show. Thus, it is not up to us individuals to make a choice between TCC and SCC. Many people insist that TCC should be dominant in these areas. TCC may not necessarily promote our awareness of art or history, but Calligraphy is expressed in the form of TCC, and many ancient books involve words that SCC does not full addressed. Unfortunately, under a SCC environment, we may have less chance to know about TCC. |
6樓2012-02-05 14:25:44
zhaokan123
金蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
- ESEPI: 2
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 866.5
- 沙發(fā): 1
- 帖子: 594
- 在線: 112.1小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 537892
- 注冊(cè): 2008-04-02
- 性別: GG
- 專(zhuān)業(yè): 合成藥物化學(xué)
|
There also exists an opposite opinion exists in me. Why Chinese language can't become an international one like English? Except for the difference between the power of the goverments, the characters itself is responsible as well. As we all know, Chinese characters are pictographic character, it is impossible to extract units of the words, which make these characters easier to comprehend. On the countary, English words consist of letters, and they are simplified symbols. To summarize my perspective, characters, as a tool, the easier, the better; but as a surppot of culture, the more original, the better. |
7樓2012-02-05 14:41:53
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿北京科技大學(xué)085601材料工程英一數(shù)二初試總分335求調(diào)劑 +6 | 雙馬尾痞老板2 2026-04-01 | 6/300 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 289求調(diào)劑 +21 | 新時(shí)代材料 2026-03-27 | 23/1150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085602化學(xué)工程268分蹲調(diào)劑 +8 | 月照花林。 2026-04-01 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 266分，一志愿電氣工程，本科材料，求材料專(zhuān)業(yè)調(diào)劑 +8 | 哇呼哼呼哼 2026-04-01 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 362求調(diào)劑 +13 | 西南交材料專(zhuān)碩3 2026-03-31 | 13/650 |
|
|
|
[考研] 285求調(diào)劑 +5 | FZAC123 2026-03-30 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中農(nóng)0710生物學(xué)，微生物方向總分338求調(diào)劑 +3 | 柒xxxx. 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 環(huán)境工程 085701，267求調(diào)劑 +15 | minht 2026-03-29 | 16/800 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085602 307分 求調(diào)劑 +10 | 不知道叫什么！ 2026-03-26 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料工程085601數(shù)二英一335求調(diào)劑 +5 | 雙馬尾痞老板2 2026-03-31 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0856求調(diào)劑 +9 | 楒桉 2026-03-28 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 本科211安全工程，初試290分，求調(diào)劑 +3 | 2719846834 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085404 22408 315分 +5 | zhuangyan123 2026-03-31 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑求院校招收 +7 | 鶴鯨鴿 2026-03-28 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研]
 一志愿大連理工大學(xué)材料求調(diào)劑
+6
|
Gymno 2026-03-30 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 食品工程專(zhuān)碩一志愿中海洋309求調(diào)劑 +5 | 小張zxy張 2026-03-26 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 281求調(diào)劑 +5 | 亞克西good 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 279求調(diào)劑 +12 | j的立方 2026-03-29 | 12/600 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)321分求調(diào)劑 +10 | 三dd. 2026-03-30 | 11/550 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南京航空航天大學(xué)材料學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑 +3 | @taotao 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|