 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1428 | 回復(fù): 9 | |||
| 本帖產(chǎn)生 1 個(gè) ESEPI ，點(diǎn)擊這里進(jìn)行查看 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
zhaokan123金蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
|
[交流]
Which is better, traditional Chinese characters or simplified Chinese characters
|
||
|
There is always an arguement about the use of traditional Chinese characters and simplified Chinese characters among we Chinese people. Some people argue that traditional Chinese characters, also known as the original coplex form of Chinese characters, should be applied the basic characters we use in our daily life, because these characters represent our history and traditional culture, which remind us who we are. A typical example goes to the calligraphy--a treasure we all cherish--which becomes meaningless in the form of simplified Chiese characters. However, there is also voices insist that simplified Chinese characters are better, as they are easier to learn, and most importantly, are time saving, which sparkles since we live in a rapidly developing world. They hold the opinion that those issues related to cuture and history should be protected by those people who doing the cutural and historical jobs, rather than we common people. So, what is your opinion on it? [ Last edited by zhaokan123 on 2012-2-4 at 15:43 ] |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
070300一志愿211，312分求調(diào)劑院校
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
332求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
-
279求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
310求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
-
材料專碩 085600求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
0703化學(xué)/290求調(diào)劑/本科經(jīng)歷豐富/工科也可
已經(jīng)有12人回復(fù)
-
生物技術(shù)與工程
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
-
085602 化學(xué)工程專碩 340分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
292求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
-
297求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有13人回復(fù)
zhaokan123
金蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
- ESEPI: 2
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 866.5
- 沙發(fā): 1
- 帖子: 594
- 在線: 112.1小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 537892
- 注冊(cè): 2008-04-02
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 合成藥物化學(xué)
|
There also exists an opposite opinion exists in me. Why Chinese language can't become an international one like English? Except for the difference between the power of the goverments, the characters itself is responsible as well. As we all know, Chinese characters are pictographic character, it is impossible to extract units of the words, which make these characters easier to comprehend. On the countary, English words consist of letters, and they are simplified symbols. To summarize my perspective, characters, as a tool, the easier, the better; but as a surppot of culture, the more original, the better. |
7樓2012-02-05 14:41:53
poyoro
木蟲(chóng) (文壇精英)
- ESEPI: 13
- 應(yīng)助: 3 (幼兒園)
- 貴賓: 1.05
- 金幣: 1492.8
- 散金: 12871
- 紅花: 23
- 沙發(fā): 209
- 帖子: 10651
- 在線: 1172.7小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 589231
- 注冊(cè): 2008-08-29
|
Meaningless argument. Whether TCC or SCC up to you, both views have their own reason to support the argument. I wonder is it really important for us to debate which one is the better,which one is suit for us. Do the people who use TCC know the historical and cultural information?Do the people who use SCC are in times front row ,or they had forget who they are? Do they care about the calligraph's meaning? Funny. |
4樓2012-02-05 00:47:10
5樓2012-02-05 02:34:23
zhaokan123
金蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
- ESEPI: 2
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 866.5
- 沙發(fā): 1
- 帖子: 594
- 在線: 112.1小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 537892
- 注冊(cè): 2008-04-02
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 合成藥物化學(xué)
|
I might not have expressed my opinion clearly enough, but this debate is not a meaningless one. In fact, the society has its tendency, for example, SCC occupied our print or internet or TV show. Thus, it is not up to us individuals to make a choice between TCC and SCC. Many people insist that TCC should be dominant in these areas. TCC may not necessarily promote our awareness of art or history, but Calligraphy is expressed in the form of TCC, and many ancient books involve words that SCC does not full addressed. Unfortunately, under a SCC environment, we may have less chance to know about TCC. |
6樓2012-02-05 14:25:44
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 化學(xué)308分調(diào)劑 +7 | 你好明天你好 2026-03-30 | 7/350 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 327求調(diào)劑 +4 | 小卡不卡. 2026-03-29 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué)0703 調(diào)劑 306分 一志愿211 +7 | 26要上岸 2026-03-28 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 298求調(diào)劑 +4 | 種圣賜 2026-03-28 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 071000生物學(xué)求調(diào)劑，初試成績(jī)343 +7 | 小小甜面團(tuán) 2026-03-25 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 312，生物學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +3 | 小譯同學(xué)abc 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 283求調(diào)劑 +7 | A child 2026-03-28 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 292求調(diào)劑 +14 | 鵝鵝鵝額額額額?/a> 2026-03-25 | 15/750 |
|
|
|
[考研] 331環(huán)境科學(xué)與工程求調(diào)劑 +3 | 熠然好運(yùn)氣 2026-03-27 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 348求調(diào)劑 +4 | 小懶蟲(chóng)不懶了 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +10 | 呼呼？~+123456 2026-03-24 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +6 | 林之夕 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 284求調(diào)劑 +11 | junqihahaha 2026-03-26 | 12/600 |
|
|
|
[考研] 總分322求生物學(xué)/生化與分子/生物信息學(xué)相關(guān)調(diào)劑 +5 | 星沉uu 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿河工大 081700 276求調(diào)劑 +4 | 地球繞著太陽(yáng)轉(zhuǎn) 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 290分調(diào)劑求助 +3 | 吉祥止止陳 2026-03-25 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 318求調(diào)劑 +3 | plum李子 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研]
 085404電子信息284分求調(diào)劑
+4
|
13659058978 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿吉大化學(xué)322求調(diào)劑 +4 | 17501029541 2026-03-23 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑 +4 | LHHL66 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|