 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 3/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 4063 | 回復(fù): 40 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
yalefield金蟲 (文壇精英)
老漢一枚
|
[交流]
波函數(shù)----并非統(tǒng)計(jì)工具而是物理真實(shí) 【轉(zhuǎn)】 已有14人參與
|
||
|
http://www.edu.cn/ren_yu_zi_ran_ ... 111220_721232.shtml 在《Nature》雜志公布2011年最受歡迎的十大新聞中，排名第6的是： 波函數(shù)并非統(tǒng)計(jì)工具而是物理真實(shí) 據(jù)《自然》雜志網(wǎng)站2011年11月17日報道，波函數(shù)是量子力學(xué)中一個重要且令人費(fèi)解的核心概念，物理學(xué)家用它來確定量子粒子具備某種特性的概率，而英國科學(xué)家2011年11月14日發(fā)表在arXiv。org網(wǎng)站的一篇論文則提出了一個新觀點(diǎn)： 波函數(shù)并非統(tǒng)計(jì)工具而是物理真實(shí) 由英國帝國理工學(xué)院的馬修·皮由茲領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的三人科學(xué)小組在最新發(fā)表的論文中指出，如果波函數(shù)純粹只是統(tǒng)計(jì)工具的話，那么，時間和空間中互不連貫的量子狀態(tài)都將可以相互“交流”，這聽起來有點(diǎn)不可思議，很難成立，因此波函數(shù)必定是物理真實(shí)。 研究人員之一、美國南加州克萊姆森大學(xué)的理論物理學(xué)家安東尼·瓦倫提尼表示：“我們的這篇論文可能具有顛覆效應(yīng)，在量子力學(xué)中，它可能是繼貝爾定理之后最重要的結(jié)論�！� 英國牛津大學(xué)的物理學(xué)家戴維·華萊士表示，這個理論是他15年的職業(yè)生涯內(nèi)看到的量子力學(xué)基礎(chǔ)領(lǐng)域最重要的結(jié)論。他說：“這一理論表明，人們不能將量子狀態(tài)解釋為一種概率�！� 自上世紀(jì)20年代開始，科學(xué)界在如何理解波函數(shù)方面就存在很大爭議。丹麥最著名的科學(xué)家、哥本哈根大學(xué)的尼爾斯·玻爾開創(chuàng)的“哥本哈根解釋”認(rèn)為，波函數(shù)是一個計(jì)算工具：當(dāng)被用來計(jì)算粒子擁有不同特性的可能性時，它能給出正確的結(jié)論。 |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
286求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
-
一志愿南昌大學(xué)324求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
0703化學(xué)/290求調(diào)劑/本科經(jīng)歷豐富/工科也可
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
-
291求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
308求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
085404求調(diào)劑，總分309，本科經(jīng)歷較為豐富
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
壓國家一區(qū)線，求導(dǎo)師收留，有恩必謝！
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
一志愿中南大學(xué)化學(xué)0703總分337求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
083000學(xué)碩274求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
304求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
anin
木蟲 (著名寫手)
如來的神掌
- 應(yīng)助: 4 (幼兒園)
- 貴賓: 0.082
- 金幣: 2950.2
- 散金: 20
- 紅花: 6
- 帖子: 1833
- 在線: 184.6小時
- 蟲號: 69399
- 注冊: 2005-05-21
- 專業(yè): 金屬材料的微觀結(jié)構(gòu)
29樓2012-04-03 14:30:21
yalefield
金蟲 (文壇精英)
老漢一枚
- 應(yīng)助: 129 (高中生)
- 貴賓: 0.17
- 金幣: 21238.9
- 散金: 3440
- 紅花: 66
- 帖子: 12101
- 在線: 759.1小時
- 蟲號: 96063
- 注冊: 2005-10-07
- 專業(yè): 高等教育學(xué)
- 管轄: 計(jì)算模擬
|
Nature網(wǎng)站的報導(dǎo)： Quantum theorem shakes foundations http://www.nature.com/news/quant ... -foundations-1.9392 Nature doi:10.1038/nature.2011.9392 The wavefunction is a real physical object after all, say researchers. Eugenie Samuel Reich 17 November 2011 Mathematical device or physical fact? The elusive nature of the quantum wavefunction may be pinned down at last. At the heart of the weirdness for which the field of quantum mechanics is famous is the wavefunction, a powerful but mysterious entity that is used to determine the probabilities that quantum particles will have certain properties. Now, a preprint posted online on 14 November1 reopens the question of what the wavefunction represents — with an answer that could rock quantum theory to its core. Whereas many physicists have generally interpreted the wavefunction as a statistical tool that reflects our ignorance of the particles being measured, the authors of the latest paper argue that, instead, it is physically real. “I don't like to sound hyperbolic, but I think the word 'seismic' is likely to apply to this paper,” says Antony Valentini, a theoretical physicist specializing in quantum foundations at Clemson University in South Carolina. Valentini believes that this result may be the most important general theorem relating to the foundations of quantum mechanics since Bell’s theorem, the 1964 result in which Northern Irish physicist John Stewart Bell proved that if quantum mechanics describes real entities, it has to include mysterious “action at a distance”. Action at a distance occurs when pairs of quantum particles interact in such a way that they become entangled. But the new paper, by a trio of physicists led by Matthew Pusey at Imperial College London, presents a theorem showing that if a quantum wavefunction were purely a statistical tool, then even quantum states that are unconnected across space and time would be able to communicate with each other. As that seems very unlikely to be true, the researchers conclude that the wavefunction must be physically real after all. David Wallace, a philosopher of physics at the University of Oxford, UK, says that the theorem is the most important result in the foundations of quantum mechanics that he has seen in his 15-year professional career. “This strips away obscurity and shows you can’t have an interpretation of a quantum state as probabilistic,” he says. The debate over how to understand the wavefunction goes back to the 1920s. In the ‘Copenhagen interpretation’ pioneered by Danish physicist Niels Bohr, the wavefunction was considered a computational tool: it gave correct results when used to calculate the probability of particles having various properties, but physicists were encouraged not to look for a deeper explanation of what the wavefunction is. Albert Einstein also favoured a statistical interpretation of the wavefunction, although he thought that there had to be some other as-yet-unknown underlying reality. But others, such as Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger, considered the wavefunction, at least initially, to be a real physical object. The Copenhagen interpretation later fell out of popularity, but the idea that the wavefunction reflects what we can know about the world, rather than physical reality, has come back into vogue in the past 15 years with the rise of quantum information theory, Valentini says. Rudolph and his colleagues may put a stop to that trend. Their theorem effectively says that individual quantum systems must “know” exactly what state they have been prepared in, or the results of measurements on them would lead to results at odds with quantum mechanics. They declined to comment while their preprint is undergoing the journal-submission process, but say in their paper that their finding is similar to the notion that an individual coin being flipped in a biased way — for example, so that it comes up 'heads' six out of ten times — has the intrinsic, physical property of being biased, in contrast to the idea that the bias is simply a statistical property of many coin-flip outcomes. Quantum information Robert Spekkens, a physicist at the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics in Waterloo, Canada, who has favoured a statistical interpretation of the wavefunction, says that Pusey's theorem is correct and a “fantastic” result, but that he disagrees about what conclusion should be drawn from it. He favours an interpretation in which all quantum states, including non-entangled ones, are related after all. Spekkens adds that he does expect the theorem to have broader consequences for physics, as have Bell’s and other fundamental theorems. No one foresaw in 1964 that Bell’s theorem would sow the seeds for quantum information theory and quantum cryptography — both of which rely on phenomena that aren’t possible in classical physics. Spekkens thinks this theorem may ultimately have a similar impact. “It’s very important and beautiful in its simplicity,” he says. [ Last edited by yalefield on 2012-4-2 at 02:13 ] |
2樓2012-04-02 02:08:52
yalefield
金蟲 (文壇精英)
老漢一枚
- 應(yīng)助: 129 (高中生)
- 貴賓: 0.17
- 金幣: 21238.9
- 散金: 3440
- 紅花: 66
- 帖子: 12101
- 在線: 759.1小時
- 蟲號: 96063
- 注冊: 2005-10-07
- 專業(yè): 高等教育學(xué)
- 管轄: 計(jì)算模擬
★ ★
franch: 金幣+2, 鼓勵交流。。。。。呵呵 2012-04-02 09:58:16
franch: 金幣+2, 鼓勵交流。。。。。呵呵 2012-04-02 09:58:16
|
附件是那篇論文。 Matthew F. Pusey, Jonathan Barrett, Terry Rudolph The quantum state cannot be interpreted statistically arXiv:1111.3328v1 http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1111.3328 |
» 本帖附件資源列表
-
歡迎監(jiān)督和反饋：小木蟲僅提供交流平臺，不對該內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
本內(nèi)容由用戶自主發(fā)布，如果其內(nèi)容涉及到知識產(chǎn)權(quán)問題，其責(zé)任在于用戶本人，如對版權(quán)有異議，請聯(lián)系郵箱：xiaomuchong@tal.com - 附件 1 : 1111.3328v1.pdf
2012-04-02 02:10:55, 538.06 K
3樓2012-04-02 02:12:13
 |
4樓2012-04-02 09:13:38
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 085701環(huán)境工程，267求調(diào)劑 +13 | minht 2026-03-26 | 13/650 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
[考研] 340求調(diào)劑 +5 | jhx777 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 07化學(xué)280分求調(diào)劑 +10 | 722865 2026-03-23 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +7 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-25 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿北京化工大學(xué)材料與化工 264分各科過A區(qū)國家線 +10 | 哈哈157349 2026-03-21 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 321求調(diào)劑 +4 | 璞玉~~ 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 315調(diào)劑 +4 | 0860求調(diào)劑 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 349求調(diào)劑 +5 | 杰斯塔里斯 2026-03-21 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 321求調(diào)劑 +6 | Ymlll 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué)工程085602 305分求調(diào)劑 +17 | RichLi_ 2026-03-25 | 17/850 |
|
|
|
[考研] 中國科學(xué)院深圳先進(jìn)技術(shù)研究院-光纖傳感課題組招生-中國科學(xué)院大學(xué)、深圳理工大學(xué)聯(lián)培 +5 | YangTyu1 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 總分293求調(diào)劑 +6 | 加一一九 2026-03-25 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 303求調(diào)劑 +6 | 藍(lán)山月 2026-03-25 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 086003食品工程求調(diào)劑 +6 | 淼淼111 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 289材料與化工（085600）B區(qū)求調(diào)劑 +4 | 這么名字咋樣 2026-03-22 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿重慶大學(xué)085700資源與環(huán)境，總分308求調(diào)劑 +7 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-23 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 工科0856求調(diào)劑 +5 | 沐析汀汀 2026-03-21 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 石河子大學(xué)（211、雙一流）碩博研究生長期招生公告 +3 | 李子目 2026-03-22 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 285求調(diào)劑 +6 | ytter 2026-03-22 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工（0856）304求 B區(qū) 調(diào)劑 +3 | 邱gl 2026-03-21 | 3/150 |
|